journal article·2025Open access

Proactive Disentangled Modeling of Trigger–Object Pairings for Backdoor Defense

Kyle Stein, Andrew A. Mahyari, Guillermo Francia III, Eman El-Sheikh

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 85· Issue 1

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) and generative AI (GenAI) are increasingly vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where adversaries embed triggers into inputs to cause models to misclassify or misinterpret target labels. Beyond traditional single-trigger scenarios, attackers may inject multiple triggers across various object classes, forming unseen backdoor-object configurations that evade standard detection pipelines. In this paper, we introduce DBOM (Disentangled Backdoor-Object Modeling), a proactive framework that leverages structured disentanglement to identify and neutralize both seen and unseen backdoor threats at the dataset level. Specifically, DBOM factorizes input image representations by modeling triggers and objects as independent primitives in the embedding space through the use of Vision-Language Models (VLMs). By leveraging the frozen, pre-trained encoders of VLMs, our approach decomposes the latent representations into distinct components through a learnable visual prompt repository and prompt prefix tuning, ensuring that the relationships between triggers and objects are explicitly captured. To separate trigger and object representations in the visual prompt repository, we introduce the trigger–object separation and diversity losses that aids in disentangling trigger and object visual features. Next, by aligning image features with feature decomposition and fusion, as well as learned contextual prompt tokens in a shared multimodal space, DBOM enables zero-shot generalization to novel trigger-object pairings that were unseen during training, thereby offering deeper insights into adversarial attack patterns. Experimental results on CIFAR-10 and GTSRB demonstrate that DBOM robustly detects poisoned images prior to downstream training, significantly enhancing the security of DNN training pipelines.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
2. Chowdhary · Fundamentals of artificial intelligence · 2020 · 603
3. Attention in natural language processing10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3019893 ↗
4. Mvitv2: improved multiscale vision transformers for classification and detection
5. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 ↗
6. Snell · Proceeding Advanced Neural Information Process Systems · 2017 · 4080
7. Threat of adversarial attacks on deep learning in computer vision: a survey10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2807385 ↗
8. Adversarial attacks and defenses in large language models: old and new threats
9. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision
10. Generative adversarial networks10.1145/3422622 ↗
11. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models
12. BadNets: evaluating backdooring attacks on deep neural networks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909068 ↗
13. Trojaning attack on neural networks
14. Symmetry and group in attribute-object compositions
15. Nguyen A, Tran A. Wanet–imperceptible warping-based backdoor attack. arXiv:2102.10369. 2021.
16. Niu Y, He S, Wei Q, Wu Z, Liu F, Feng L. Bdetclip: multimodal prompting contrastive test-time backdoor detection. arXiv:2405.15269. 2024.
17. When nas meets robustness: in search of robust architectures against adversarial attacks
18. Effective, efficient and robust neural architecture search
19. Enhancing fine-tuning based backdoor defense with sharpness-aware minimization
20. Deep k-nn defense against clean-label data poisoning attacks
21. Real-time detectors for digital and physical adversarial inputs to perception systems
22. Wen J. HOLMES: to detect adversarial examples with multiple detectors. arXiv:2405.19956. 2024.
23. Stein K, Mahyari AA, Francia G, El-Sheikh E. Proactive adversarial defense: harnessing prompt tuning in vision-language models to detect unseen backdoored images. arXiv:2412.08755. 2024.
24. Augmented neural fine-tuning for efficient backdoor purification
25. Xu Y, Gu Y, Sakurai K. PAD-FT: a lightweight defense for backdoor attacks via data purification and fine-tuning. arXiv:2409.12072. 2024.10.1145/3733826.3762677 ↗
26. Chen B, Carvalho W, Baracaldo N, Ludwig H, Edwards B, Lee T, et al. Detecting backdoor attacks on deep neural networks by activation clustering. arXiv:1811.03728. 2018.
27. Spectral signatures in backdoor attacks
28. SPECTRE: defending against backdoor attacks using robust statistics
29. Demon in the variant: statistical analysis of DNNs for robust backdoor contamination detection
30. Ma W, Wang D, Sun R, Xue M, Wen S, Xiang Y. The “Beatrix” resurrections: robust backdoor detection via gram matrices. arXiv:2209.11715. 2022.10.14722/ndss.2023.23069 ↗
31. Li Y, He J, Huang H, Sun J, Ma X. Shortcuts everywhere and nowhere: exploring multi-trigger backdoor attacks. arXiv:2401.15295. 2024.10.1109/TDSC.2025.3605597 ↗
32. Lake BM. Towards more human-like concept learning in machines: compositionality, causality, and learning-to-learn. massachusetts institute of technology; 2014. [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/95856.
33. Hierarchical disentanglement of discriminative latent features for zero-shot learning
34. Semantics disentangling for generalized zero-shot learning
35. Generalized zero-shot learning via disentangled representation
36. Learning attention as disentangler for compositional zero-shot learning
37. Stein K, Mahyari A, Francia G, El-Sheikh E. Visual adaptive prompting for compositional zero-shot learning. arXiv:2502.20292. 2025.
38. Siamese contrastive embedding network for compositional zero-shot learning
39. Retrieval-augmented primitive representations for compositional zero-shot learning
40. Nayak NV, Yu P, Bach SH. Learning to compose soft prompts for compositional zero-shot learning. arXiv:2204.03574. 2022.
41. GIPCOL: graph-injected soft prompting for compositional zero-shot learning
42. Decomposed soft prompt guided fusion enhancing for compositional zero-shot learning
43. Invisible backdoor attacks on deep neural networks via steganography and regularization
44. Wu B, Wei S, Zhu M, Zheng M, Zhu Z, Zhang M, et al. Defenses in adversarial machine learning: a survey. arXiv:2312.08890. 2023.
45. Avd O, Li Y, Vinyals O. Representation learning with contrastive predictive coding. arXiv:1807.03748. 2018.
46. Conditional prompt learning for vision-language models
47. Learning to prompt for vision-language models10.1007/s11263-022-01653-1 ↗
48. Maple: multi-modal prompt learning
49. Krizhevsky A, Hinton G. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009. [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.cs.utoronto.ca/.
50. Man vs. computer: benchmarking machine learning algorithms for traffic sign recognition10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.016 ↗
51. Latent backdoor attacks on deep neural networks
52. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
53. Kingma DP. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980. 2014.
54. Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks
55. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples