journal article·2025Open access

Efficient Prediction of Quasi-Phase Equilibrium in KKS Phase Field Model via Grey Wolf-Optimized Neural Network

Changsheng Zhu, Jintao Miao, Zihao Gao, Shuo Liu, Jingjie Li

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 84· Issue 3

Abstract

As the demand for advanced material design and performance prediction continues to grow, traditional phase-field models are increasingly challenged by limitations in computational efficiency and predictive accuracy, particularly when addressing high-dimensional and complex data in multicomponent systems. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes an innovative model, LSGWO-BP, which integrates an improved Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with a backpropagation neural network (BP) to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of quasi-phase equilibrium predictions within the KKS phase-field framework. Three mapping enhancement strategies were investigated–Circle-Root, Tent-Cosine, and Logistic-Sine mappings–with the Logistic mapping further improved via Sine perturbation to boost global search capability and convergence speed in large-scale, complex data scenarios. Evaluation results demonstrate that the LSGWO-BP model significantly outperforms conventional machine learning approaches in predicting quasi-phase equilibrium, achieving a 14–28 reduction in mean absolute error (MAE). Substantial improvements were also observed in mean squared error, root mean squared error, and mean absolute percentage error, alongside a 7–33 increase in the coefficient of determination (). Furthermore, the model exhibits strong potential for microstructural simulation applications. Overall, the study confirms the effectiveness of the LSGWO-BP model in materials science, especially in enhancing phase-field modeling efficiency and enabling accurate, intelligent prediction for multicomponent alloy systems, thereby offering robust support for microstructure prediction and control.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Fast prediction of the quasi phase equilibrium in phase field model for multicomponent alloys based on machine learning method10.1016/j.calphad.2019.101644 ↗
2. Phase-field models for microstructure evolution10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
3. Phase-field models in materials science10.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
4. An introduction to phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution10.1016/j.calphad.2007.11.003 ↗
5. Unified derivation of phase-field models for alloy solidification from a grand-potential functional10.1103/PhysRevE.84.031601 ↗
6. Phase field microelasticity theory and modeling of elastically and structurally inhomogeneous solid10.1063/1.1492859 ↗
7. Phase-field simulation of solidification10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
8. Phase-field modeling of microstructure evolution: recent applications, perspectives and challenges10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100810 ↗
9. The CALPHAD approach for HEAs: challenges and opportunities10.1557/s43577-022-00284-8 ↗
10. Achieving highly strengthened Al–Cu–Mg alloy by grain refinement and grain boundary segregation10.1016/j.msea.2020.139668 ↗
11. Application of phase field model coupled with convective effects in binary alloy directional solidification and roll casting processes10.3389/fmats.2022.989040 ↗
12. Enhanced mechanical properties of high-temperature-resistant Al-Cu cast alloy by microalloying with Mg10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154305 ↗
13. Microstructure and hot tearing sensitivity simulation and parameters optimization for the centrifugal casting of Al-Cu alloy
14. Machine-learning-based surrogate modeling of microstructure evolution using phase-field10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111750 ↗
15. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
16. Accelerating phase-field-based microstructure evolution predictions via surrogate models trained by machine learning methods10.1038/s41524-020-00471-8 ↗
17. Deep reinforcement learning for multi-phase microstructure design
18. Thermal conductivity prediction of nano enhanced phase change materials: a comparative machine learning approach10.1016/j.est.2021.103633 ↗
19. Accelerating phase-field predictions via recurrent neural networks learning the microstructure evolution in latent space10.1016/j.cma.2022.115128 ↗
20. Deep generative models for materials discovery and machine learning-accelerated innovation10.3389/fmats.2022.865270 ↗
21. Accelerate microstructure evolution simulation using graph neural networks with adaptive spatiotemporal resolution
22. Phase-field model for binary alloys10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
23. A thermodynamic assessment of the Al–Cu–Mg ternary system10.1361/105497198770342058 ↗
24. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
25. Recent advances in Grey Wolf Optimizer, its versions and applications: review10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3304889 ↗
26. A chaotic optimization method based on logistic-sine map for numerical function optimization10.1007/s00521-020-04815-9 ↗
27. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
28. Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest
29. Logistic regression, AdaBoost and Bregman distances10.1023/A:1013912006537 ↗
30. Introduction to linear regression analysis10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00485_6.x ↗
31. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008 ↗
32. An overview of variants and advancements of PSO algorithm10.3390/app12178392 ↗
33. AVOA-optimized CNN-BILSTM-SENet framework for hydrodynamic performance prediction of bionic pectoral fins10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121002 ↗
34. A WOA-based optimization approach for task scheduling in cloud computing systems10.1109/JSYST.2019.2960088 ↗
35. Optimization of random forest through the use of MVO, GWO and MFO in evaluating the stability of underground entry-type excavations10.1016/j.tust.2022.104494 ↗