Adversarial Perturbation for Sensor Data Anonymization: Balancing Privacy and Utility
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent advances in wearable devices have enabled large-scale collection of sensor data across healthcare, sports, and other domains but this has also raised critical privacy concerns, especially under tightening regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which explicitly restrict the processing of data that can re-identify individuals. Although existing anonymization approaches such as the Anonymizing AutoEncoder (AAE) can reduce the risk of re-identification, they often introduce substantial waveform distortions and fail to preserve information beyond a single classification task (e.g., human activity recognition). This study proposes a novel sensor data anonymization method based on Adversarial Perturbations (AP) to address these limitations. By generating minimal yet targeted noise, the proposed method significantly degrades the accuracy of identity classification while retaining essential features for multiple tasks such as activity, gender, or device-position recognition. Moreover, to enhance robustness against frequency-domain analysis, additional models trained on transformed (e.g., short-time Fourier transform (STFT)) representations are incorporated into the perturbation process. A multi-task formulation is introduced that selectively suppresses person-identifying features while reinforcing those relevant to other desired tasks without retraining large autoencoder-based architectures. The proposed framework is, to our knowledge, the first AP-based anonymization technique that (i) defends simultaneously against time- and frequency-domain attacks and (ii) allows per-task trade-off control on a single forward-back-propagation run, enabling real-time, on-device deployment on commodity hardware. On three public datasets, the proposed method reduces person-identification accuracy from 60–90% to near-chance levels (%) while preserving the original activity-recognition F1 both in the time and frequency domains. Compared with the baseline AAE, the proposed method improves downstream task F1 and lowers waveform mean squared error, demonstrating a better privacy-utility trade-off without additional model retraining. These findings underscore the effectiveness and flexibility of AP in privacy-preserving sensor-data processing, offering a practical solution that safeguards user identity while retaining rich, application-critical information.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances on IoT-assisted wearable sensor systems for healthcare monitoring10.3390/bios11100372 ↗
2. Advances in biointegrated wearable and implantable optoelectronic devices for cardiac healthcare10.34133/cbsystems.0172 ↗
3. Sensors and devices guided by artificial intelligence for personalized pain medicine10.34133/cbsystems.0160 ↗
4. Lam Po Tang · Textiles for sportswear. Woodhead publishing series in textiles · 2015 · 16910.1016/B978-1-78242-229-7.00008-4 ↗
5. Designing wearable systems for sports: a review of trends and opportunities in human-computer interaction10.1109/THMS.2019.2919702 ↗
6. Motti · Financial Cryptography and Data Security: FC 2015 · 2015 · 23110.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_17 ↗
7. Certificateless public auditing scheme with data privacy and dynamics in group user model of cloud-assisted medical WSNs10.1109/JBHI.2021.3128775 ↗
8. The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review10.2196/34384 ↗
9. Assessing the availability of users to engage in just-in-time intervention in the natural environment
10. Differential privacy with weighted for privacy-preservation in human activity recognition
11. PGAN framework for synthesizing sensor data privately
12. Mobile sensor data anonymization
13. Privacy preservation in sensor-based human activity recognition through autoencoders for low-power IoT devices10.1016/j.iot.2024.101189 ↗
14. Szegedy C, Zaremba W, Sutskever I, Bruna J, Erhan D, Goodfellow I, et al. Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv:1312.6199. 2013.
15. Protecting sensory data against sensitive inferences
16. Banos · Ambient assisted living and daily activities · 2014 · 9110.1007/978-3-319-13105-4_14 ↗
17. UniMiB SHAR: a dataset for human activity recognition using acceleration data from smartphones10.3390/app7101101 ↗
18. Industrial Internet of Things for smart manufacturing applications using hierarchical trustful resource assignment10.1016/j.comcom.2020.06.004 ↗
19. IoT and big data applications in smart cities: recent advances, challenges, and critical issues10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070905 ↗
20. A single tri-axial accelerometer-based real-time personal life log system capable of human activity recognition and exercise information generation10.1007/s00779-011-0403-3 ↗
21. Activity recognition method for home-based elderly care service based on random forest and activity similarity10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894184 ↗
22. Recognizing and understanding nursing activities for a whole day with a big dataset
23. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers10.1145/1964897.1964918 ↗
24. Complex human activity recognition using smartphone and wrist-worn motion sensors10.3390/s16040426 ↗
25. Human physical activity recognition using smartphone sensors10.3390/s19030458 ↗
26. Han · IEEE Trans Mob Comput · 2024 · 23 · 557110.1109/TMC.2023.3314837 ↗
27. Comparison of feature learning methods for human activity recognition using wearable sensors10.3390/s18020679 ↗
28. HARDenseNet: A 1D densenet inspired convolutional neural network for human activity recognition with inertial sensors
29. iSPLInception: an inception-resnet deep learning architecture for human activity recognition10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3078184 ↗
30. Human activity recognition and fall detection using convolutional neural network and transformer-based architecture10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106412 ↗
31. A hybrid transformer framework for efficient activity recognition using consumer electronics10.1109/TCE.2024.3373824 ↗
32. Modeling transformer architecture with attention layer for human activity recognition10.1007/s00521-023-09362-7 ↗
33. Data privacy in the Internet of Things based on anonymization: a review10.3233/JCS-210089 ↗
34. Privacy-preserving human activity sensing: a survey10.1016/j.hcc.2024.100204 ↗
35. Motion sensor data anonymization by time-frequency filtering
36. Efficient perturbation techniques for preserving privacy of multivariate sensitive data10.1016/j.array.2023.100324 ↗
37. Supporting pattern-preserving anonymization for time-series data10.1109/TKDE.2011.249 ↗
38. Protecting privacy when disclosing information: k-anonymity and its enforcement through generalization and suppression
39. A clustering K-anonymity privacy-preserving method for wearable IoT devices10.1155/2018/4945152 ↗
40. Random projection-based multiplicative data perturbation for privacy preserving distributed data mining10.1109/TKDE.2006.14 ↗
41. Goodfellow · Advances in neural information processing systems · 2014 · 27
42. Hallyburton · Pattern recognition · 2025 · 17
43. A privacy-enhanced human activity recognition using GAN & entropy ranking of microaggregated data10.1007/s10586-023-04063-1 ↗
44. Privacy issues regarding the application of DNNs to activity-recognition using wearables and its countermeasures by use of adversarial training
45. DySan: dynamically sanitizing motion sensor data against sensitive inferences through adversarial networks
46. Protecting activity sensing data privacy using hierarchical information dissociation
47. Person re-identification without identification via event anonymization
48. Preventing sensitive information leakage from mobile sensor signals via integrative transformation10.1109/TMC.2021.3078086 ↗
49. Adversarial machine learning at scale
50. Improving transferability of adversarial examples with input diversity
51. Evading defenses to transferable adversarial examples by translation-invariant attacks
52. Goodfellow IJ, Shlens J, Szegedy C. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv:1412.6572. 2015.
53. Chung MK. Gaussian kernel smoothing. arXiv:2007.09539. 2021.
54. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition
55. Deep residual learning for image recognition
56. Zheng · Launching the new profile on facebook: understanding the triggers and outcomes of users’ privacy concerns · 2012 · 325
57. Inferring user routes and locations using zero-permission mobile sensors