journal article·2025Open access

FSFS: A Novel Statistical Approach for Fair and Trustworthy Impactful Feature Selection in Artificial Intelligence Models

Ali Hamid Farea, Iman Askerzade, Omar H. Alhazmi, Savaş Takan

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 84· Issue 1

Abstract

Feature selection (FS) is a pivotal pre-processing step in developing data-driven models, influencing reliability, performance and optimization. Although existing FS techniques can yield high-performance metrics for certain models, they do not invariably guarantee the extraction of the most critical or impactful features. Prior literature underscores the significance of equitable FS practices and has proposed diverse methodologies for the identification of appropriate features. However, the challenge of discerning the most relevant and influential features persists, particularly in the context of the exponential growth and heterogeneity of big data—a challenge that is increasingly salient in modern artificial intelligence (AI) applications. In response, this study introduces an innovative, automated statistical method termed Farea Similarity for Feature Selection (FSFS). The FSFS approach computes a similarity metric for each feature by benchmarking it against the record-wise mean, thereby finding feature dependencies and mitigating the influence of outliers that could potentially distort evaluation outcomes. Features are subsequently ranked according to their similarity scores, with the threshold established at the average similarity score. Notably, lower FSFS values indicate higher similarity and stronger data correlations, whereas higher values suggest lower similarity. The FSFS method is designed not only to yield reliable evaluation metrics but also to reduce data complexity without compromising model performance. Comparative analyses were performed against several established techniques, including Chi-squared (CS), Correlation Coefficient (CC), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Exhaustive Approach, Greedy Stepwise Approach, Gain Ratio, and Filtered Subset Eval, using a variety of datasets such as the Experimental Dataset, Breast Cancer Wisconsin (Original), KDD CUP 1999, NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, and Edge-IIoT. In the absence of the FSFS method, the highest classifier accuracies observed were 60.00%, 95.13%, 97.02%, 98.17%, 95.86%, and 94.62% for the respective datasets. When the FSFS technique was integrated with data normalization, encoding, balancing, and feature importance selection processes, accuracies improved to 100.00%, 97.81%, 98.63%, 98.94%, 94.27%, and 98.46%, respectively. The FSFS method, with a computational complexity of O(fn log n), demonstrates robust scalability and is well-suited for datasets of large size, ensuring efficient processing even when the number of features is substantial. By automatically eliminating outliers and redundant data, FSFS reduces computational overhead, resulting in faster training and improved model performance. Overall, the FSFS framework not only optimizes performance but also enhances the interpretability and explainability of data-driven models, thereby facilitating more trustworthy decision-making in AI applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimal deep learning LSTM model for electric load forecasting using feature selection and genetic algorithm: comparison with machine learning approaches10.3390/en11071636 ↗
2. Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: a survey on Big Data10.1016/j.ins.2014.01.015 ↗
3. A comprehensive review of dimensionality reduction techniques for feature selection and feature extraction10.38094/jastt1224 ↗
4. Leskovec · Mining of massive data sets · 2020
5. A comprehensive study of feature selection techniques in machine learning models10.70088/xpf2b276 ↗
6. Feature selection techniques for machine learning: a survey of more than two decades of research10.1007/s10115-023-02010-5 ↗
7. A comprehensive taxonomy for explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic survey of surveys on methods and concepts10.1007/s10618-022-00867-8 ↗
8. A new improved filter-based feature selection model for high-dimensional data10.1007/s11227-019-02975-7 ↗
9. The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm
10. The chi-square test: often used and more often misinterpreted10.1177/1098214011426594 ↗
11. An introduction to variable and feature selection
12. Enhanced recursive feature elimination
13. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
14. NSGA-II-DL: metaheuristic optimal feature selection with deep learning framework for HER2 classification in breast cancer10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3374890 ↗
15. Enhancing phishing detection: a machine learning approach with feature selection and deep learning models10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3543738 ↗
16. Feature selection for classification: a review
17. A review of feature selection methods based on meta-heuristic algorithms10.1080/0952813X.2023.2183267 ↗
18. Selecting critical features for data classification based on machine learning methods10.1186/s40537-020-00327-4 ↗
19. Feature selection and its use in big data: challenges, methods, and trends10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2894366 ↗
20. Effect of feature optimization on performance of machine learning models for predicting traffic incident duration10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107845 ↗
21. An efficiency-driven, correlation-based feature elimination strategy for small datasets10.1063/5.0118207 ↗
22. Feature dimensionality reduction: a review10.1007/s40747-021-00637-x ↗
23. Comparison of feature selection and feature extraction role in dimensionality reduction of big data10.51173/jt.v5i1.1027 ↗
24. Regression techniques employing feature selection to predict clinical outcomes in stroke10.1371/journal.pone.0205639 ↗
25. Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance10.1109/34.574797 ↗
26. Hall MA. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning [dissertation]. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato; 1999. [cited 2025 May 7]. Available from: https://www.lri.fr/~pierres/donn%E9es/save/these/articles/lpr-queue/hall99correlationbased.pdf.
27. Conditional likelihood maximisation: a unifying framework for information theoretic feature selection
28. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 ↗
29. Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information
30. Chi2: feature selection and discretization of numeric attributes
31. Induction of decision trees10.1023/A:1022643204877 ↗
32. A systematic literature review: recursive feature elimination algorithms10.33480/jitk.v9i2.5015 ↗
33. A note on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection10.1016/0167-8655(89)90037-8 ↗
34. Unsupervised feature selection using feature similarity10.1109/34.990133 ↗
35. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
36. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems10.1080/00401706.2000.10485983 ↗
37. Hastie · The elements of statistical learning · 200910.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
38. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent10.18637/jss.v033.i01 ↗
39. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
40. A direct method of nonparametric measurement selection10.1109/T-C.1971.223410 ↗
41. Miller · Subset selection in regression · 200210.1201/9781420035933 ↗
42. A biometrics invited paper. the analysis and selection of variables in linear regression10.2307/2529336 ↗
43. Jolliffe · Principal component analysis · 2002
44. Principal component analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
45. Floating search methods in feature selection10.1016/0167-8655(94)90127-9 ↗
46. Wrappers for feature subset selection10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00043-X ↗
47. Duda · Pattern classification · 2001
48. Generalized Fisher score for feature selection
49. Wolberg W. Breast cancer Wisconsin (original) [Dataset]. Irvine, CA, USA: UCI Machine Learning Repository; 1990 [cited 2025 Jan 1]. Available from: 10.24432/C5HP4Z.
50. Cup KDD. Data [Online]. Irvine, CA, USA: UCI Machine Learning Repository; 1999 [cited 2025 Jan 1]. Available from: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/KDD+Cup+1999+Data.
51. Edge-IIoTset: a new comprehensive realistic cyber security dataset of IoT and IIoT applications for centralized and federated learning10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3165809 ↗
52. Analysis of feature selection techniques for network traffic dataset
53. Building predictive model by using data mining and feature selection techniques on academic dataset10.5815/ijmecs.2022.04.02 ↗
54. Analysis of feature selection with classification: breast cancer datasets
55. Advanced optimized anomaly detection system for IoT cyberattacks using artificial intelligence