Dual-Perspective Evaluation of Knowledge Graphs for Graph-to-Text Generation
Source abstract
Abstract
Data curation is vital for selecting effective demonstration examples in graph-to-text generation. However, evaluating the quality of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) remains challenging. Prior research exhibits a narrow focus on structural statistics, such as the shortest path length, while the correctness of graphs in representing the associated text is rarely explored. To address this gap, we introduce a dual-perspective evaluation framework for KG-text data, based on the computation of structural adequacy and semantic alignment. From a structural perspective, we propose the Weighted Incremental Edge Method (WIEM) to quantify graph completeness by leveraging agreement between relation models to predict possible edges between entities. WIEM targets to find increments from models on “unseen links”, whose presence is inversely proportional to the structural adequacy of the original KG in representing the text. From a semantic perspective, we evaluate how well a KG aligns with the text in capturing the intended meaning. To do so, we instruct a large language model to convert KGs into natural language and measure the similarity between generated and reference texts. Based on these computations, we apply a Top-K union method, integrating the structural and semantic modules, to rank and select high-quality KGs. We evaluate our framework against various approaches for selecting few-shot examples in graph-to-text generation. Experiments on the Association for Computational Linguistics Abstract Graph Dataset (ACL-AGD) and Automatic Content Extraction 05 (ACE05) dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in distinguishing KG-text data of different qualities, evidenced by the largest performance gap between top- and bottom-ranked examples. We also find that the top examples selected through our dual-perspective framework consistently yield better performance than those selected by traditional measures. These results highlight the importance of data curation in improving graph-to-text generation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semantic Web and Ontologies · Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques · Topic Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 ↗
2. A survey on knowledge graphs: representation, acquisition, and applications10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843 ↗
3. Schneider · Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 12th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2022; · 601
4. Knowledge graph quality management: a comprehensive survey
5. A survey of knowledge-enhanced text generation10.1145/3512467 ↗
6. A survey of natural language generation
7. Investigating pretrained language models for graph-to-text generation
8. GAP: a graph-aware language model framework for knowledge graph-to-text generation
9. Koncel-Kedziorski · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · 2284
10. Decoupled semantic graph neural network for knowledge graph embedding10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128614 ↗
11. Exploring the raison d’etre behind metric selection in network analysis: a systematic review10.1007/s41109-022-00476-w ↗
12. Knowledge graph completeness: a systematic literature review10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056622 ↗
13. Aggregation or separation? Adaptive embedding message passing for knowledge graph completion10.1016/j.ins.2024.121639 ↗
14. Axelsson · Proceedings of the Workshop on Multimodal, Multilingual Natural Language Generation and Multilingual WebNLG Challenge (MM-NLG 2023) · 2023; · 39
15. Zhong · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · 2021; · 50
16. Dong · Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024; · 110710.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.64 ↗
17. A survey on augmenting knowledge graphs (KGs) with large language models (LLMs): models, evaluation metrics, benchmarks, and challenges10.1007/s44163-024-00175-8 ↗
18. Overview of Data quality: Examining the dimensions, antecedents, and impacts of data quality10.1007/s13132-022-01096-6 ↗
19. Saxena A, Iyengar S. Centrality measures in complex networks: a survey. arXiv:2011.07190. 2020.
20. Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods
21. Examining indicators of complex network vulnerability across diverse attack scenarios10.1038/s41598-023-45218-9 ↗
22. Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity?10.1007/s10980-011-9620-4 ↗
23. Chen · Knowledge graph and semantic computing: knowledge computing and language understanding · 2019 · 111
24. Fanourakis · ESWC. Vol. 13870 of lecture notes in computer science · 2023 · 7210.1007/978-3-031-33455-9_5 ↗
25. BERTScore: evaluating text generation with BERT
26. Sellam · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · 7881
27. Luan · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 3219
28. Extraction-Augmented generation of scientific abstracts using knowledge graphs10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3551756 ↗
29. Grattafiori A, Dubey A, Jauhri A, Pandey A, Kadian A, Al-Dahle A, et al. The Llama 3 herd of models. arXiv: 2407.21783. 2024.
30. Lin · Text summarization branches out · 2004 · 74