Trustworthiness Evaluation for Permissioned Blockchain-Enabled Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
As permissioned blockchain becomes a common foundation of blockchain-based circumstances for current organizations, related stakeholders need a means to assess the trustworthiness of the applications involved within. It is extremely important to consider the potential impact brought by the Blockchain technology in terms of security and privacy. Therefore, this study proposes a rigorous security risk management framework for permissioned blockchain-enabled applications. The framework divides itself into different implementation domains, i.e., organization security, application security, consensus mechanism security, node management and network security, host security and perimeter security, and simultaneously provides guidelines to control the security risks of permissioned blockchain applications with respect to these security domains. In addition, a case study, including a security testing and risk evaluation on each stack of a specific organization, is demonstrated as an implementation instruction of our proposed risk management framework. According to the best of our knowledge, this study is one of the pioneer researches that provide a means to evaluate the security risks of permissioned blockchain applications from a holistic point of view. If users can trust the applications that adopted this framework, this study can contribute to the adoption of permissioned blockchain-enabled technologies. Furthermore, application providers can use the framework to perform gap analysis on their existing systems and controls and understand the risks of their applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Cloud Data Security Solutions · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Blockchain revolution without the blockchain?10.1145/3225619 ↗
2. Military intelligence applications for blockchain technology
3. Core concepts, challenges and future directions in blockchain: A centralized tutorial
4. L. Muller, A. Glarner, T. Linder, S. D. Meyer, A. Furrer et al., “Conceptual framework for legal and risk assessment of crypto tokens–Classification of decentralized blockchain-based assets,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://regisbarondeau.com/dl190.
5. Is blockchain mining profitable in the long run?
6. Vulnerability analysis of corporate blockchain systems to network attacks
7. A security risk management framework for permissioned blockchain applications
8. A survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2896108 ↗
9. Formal modeling and verification of blockchain system
10. Bashir · Mastering Blockchain: Distributed Ledger Technology, Decentralization, and Smart Contracts Explained · 2018
11. Survey on blockchain-based smart contracts: Technical aspects and future research10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068178 ↗
12. M. P. Barrett, “Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity Version 1.1,” Apr. 2018, Accessed: May 06, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/publications/framework-improving-critical-infrastructure-cybersecurity-version-11.
13. Coulouris · Distributed systems: Concepts and design · 2011
14. D. Yang, J. Gavigan and Z. Wilcox-O’Hearn, “Survey of confidentiality and privacy preserving technologies for blockchains,” Technical report R3, 2016.
15. Deanonymisation of clients in bitcoin P2P network
16. On the secure software development process: clasp, SDL and touchpoints compared10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.010 ↗
17. Howard · Writing secure code · 2002
18. Application of the security assessment method to blockchain systems
19. Actor-based risk analysis for blockchains in smart mobility
20. Security and privacy on blockchain