journal article·2022Open access

Multilevel Modelling for Surgical Tool Calibration Using LINEX Loss Function

Mansour F. Yassen

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 73· Issue 1

Abstract

Quantifying the tool–tissue interaction forces in surgery can be utilized in the training of inexperienced surgeons, assist them better use surgical tools and avoid applying excessive pressures. The voltages read from strain gauges are used to approximate the unknown values of implemented forces. To this objective, the force-voltage connection must be quantified in order to evaluate the interaction forces during surgery. The progress of appropriate statistical learning approaches to describe the link between the genuine force applied on the tissue and numerous outputs obtained from sensors installed on surgical equipment is a key problem. In this study, different probabilistic approaches are used to evaluate the realized force on tissue using voltages read from strain gauges, including bootstrapping, Bayesian regression, weighted least squares regression, and multi-level modelling. Estimates from the proposed models are more precise than the maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood techniques. The suggested methodologies are proficient of assessing tool-tissue interface forces with an adequate level of accuracy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surgical Simulation and Training · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. A survey of surgical simulation: Applications, technology, and education10.1162/105474603322955905 ↗
2. Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: A systematic review10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.045 ↗
3. Estimation and prediction of hospitalization and medical care costs using regression in machine learning10.1155/2022/7969220 ↗
4. Machine algorithm for heartbeat monitoring and arrhythmia detection based on ECG systems10.1155/2021/7677568 ↗
5. Surgical skill assessment using motion quality and smoothness10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.006 ↗
6. A Force-sensing bipolar forceps to quantify tool–Tissue interaction forces in microsurgery10.1109/TMECH.2016.2563384 ↗
7. Nonparametric bootstrap technique for calibrating surgical smart forceps: Theory and application10.1080/17434440.2017.1378090 ↗
8. Assessment of tissue damage due to mechanical stresses
9. A Multi-feature learning model with enhanced local attention for vehicle re-identification10.32604/cmc.2021.021627 ↗
10. State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery10.1109/JSEN.2008.917481 ↗
11. Real-time measurement of tool-tissue interaction forces in neurosurgery: Quantification and analysis
12. Advances in bio-tactile sensors for minimally invasive surgery using the fibre bragg grating force sensor technique: A survey10.3390/s140406633 ↗
13. The impact of the work environment of nurses on patient safety outcomes: A multi-level modelling approach10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.020 ↗
14. Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: Analysis of long-term treatment outcomes10.1007/s00586-014-3636-9 ↗
15. A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis10.1007/s11701-019-00926-1 ↗
16. Quantification of forces during a neurosurgical procedure: A pilot study10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.001 ↗
17. An instrumented minimally invasive surgical tool: Design and calibration10.1155/2011/940867 ↗
18. Force reflecting control for bilateral teleoperation system under time-varying delays10.1109/TII.2018.2822670 ↗
19. Thermal damage assessment of novel bipolar forceps in a sheep model of spinal surgery10.1227/01.NEU.0000370246.82005.6F ↗
20. Assessing components of the model-based mean square error estimator for remote sensing assisted forest applications10.1139/cjfr-2017-0396 ↗
21. Calibration of surgical tools using multilevel modeling with LINEX loss function: Theory and experiment10.1177/09622802211003620 ↗
22. Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation of the lomax model based on upper record values under weighted LINEX loss function
23. Vehicle Re-identification model based on optimized densenet121 with joint loss10.32604/cmc.2021.016560 ↗
24. Bayesian estimations under the weighted LINEX loss function based on upper record values