Two-Fold and Symmetric Repeatability Rates for Comparing Keypoint燚etectors
Source abstract
Abstract
The repeatability rate is an important measure for evaluating and comparing the performance of keypoint detectors. Several repeatability rate measurements were used in the literature to assess the effectiveness of keypoint detectors. While these repeatability rates are calculated for pairs of images, the general assumption is that the reference image is often known and unchanging compared to other images in the same dataset. So, these rates are asymmetrical as they require calculations in only one direction. In addition, the image domain in which these computations take place substantially affects their values. The presented scatter diagram plots illustrate how these directional repeatability rates vary in relation to the size of the neighboring region in each pair of images. Therefore, both directional repeatability rates for the same image pair must be included when comparing different keypoint detectors. This paper, firstly, examines several commonly utilized repeatability rate measures for keypoint detector evaluations. The researcher then suggests computing a two-fold repeatability rate to assess keypoint detector performance on similar scene images. Next, the symmetric mean repeatability rate metric is computed using the given two-fold repeatability rates. Finally, these measurements are validated using well-known keypoint detectors on different image groups with various geometric and photometric attributes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · DNA and Biological Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Local invariant feature detectors: A survey10.1561/0600000017 ↗
2. A review of keypoints’ detection and feature description in image registration10.1155/2021/8509164 ↗
3. D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz and A. Rabinovich, “Toward geometric deep slam,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07410, 2017.
4. Shape binary patterns: An efficient local descriptor and keypoint detector for point clouds10.1007/s11042-021-11586-5 ↗
5. Comparison of keypoint detectors and descriptors for relative radiometric normalization of bitemporal remote sensing images10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3069919 ↗
6. Efficient and robust corner detectors based on second-order difference of contour10.1109/LSP.2017.2724851 ↗
7. Evaluation of interest point detectors10.1023/A:1008199403446 ↗
8. A comparison of affine region detectors
9. Comparing feature detectors: A bias in the repeatability criteria
10. Improved repeatability measures for evaluating performance of feature detectors10.1049/el.2010.1442 ↗
11. A generic framework for assessing the performance bounds of image feature detectors10.3390/rs8110928 ↗
12. Faster and better: A machine learning approach to corner detection10.1109/TPAMI.2008.275 ↗
13. Robust image corner detection based on the chord to point distance accumulation technique10.1109/TMM.2008.2001384 ↗
14. Visual Geometry Group-University of Oxford
15. Haralick · Computer and Robot Vision · 1992
16. Is repeatability an unbiased criterion for ranking feature detectors?10.1137/15M1007732 ↗
17. Virtual ground truth, and pre-selection of 3D interest points for improved repeatability evaluation of 2D detectors10.1051/matecconf/201927702032 ↗
18. Scale & affine invariant interest point detectors10.1023/B:VISI.0000027790.02288.f2 ↗
19. Large scale evaluation of local image feature detectors on homography datasets
20. Performance evaluation of single and cross-dimensional feature detection and description10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1523 ↗
21. Mouats · Journal of Intelligent. Robotics Systems · 2018 · 92 · 3310.1007/s10846-017-0762-8 ↗
22. Zhang · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 15907710.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020561 ↗
23. Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking10.1007/s11263-011-0431-5 ↗
24. Corner detection using the point-to-centroid distance technique10.1049/iet-ipr.2020.0164 ↗
25. Feature detection using relative distance and multi-scale technique10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.068 ↗
26. Surf: Speeded up robust features
27. V. Balntas, K. Lenc, A. Vedaldi and Kn Mikolajczyk, “HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors,” CVPR, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://icvl.ee.ic.ac.uk/vbalnt/hpatches/hpatches-sequences-release.tar.gz.10.1109/CVPR.2017.410 ↗
28. Evaluation of image feature detection and matching algorithms
29. A comparative analysis of SIFT, SURF, KAZE, AKAZE, ORB, and BRISK
30. Distinctive image features from scale invariant keypoints10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94 ↗
31. Kaze features