Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer from Low-Resolution Histopathology Images Using an Ensemble Network of CNN and Transformer Models
Source abstract
Abstract
One in every eight men in the US is diagnosed with prostate cancer, making it the most common cancer in men. Gleason grading is one of the most essential diagnostic and prognostic factors for planning the treatment of prostate cancer patients. Traditionally, urological pathologists perform the grading by scoring the morphological pattern, known as the Gleason pattern, in histopathology images. However, this manual grading is highly subjective, suffers intra- and inter-pathologist variability and lacks reproducibility. An automated grading system could be more efficient, with no subjectivity and higher accuracy and reproducibility. Automated methods presented previously failed to achieve sufficient accuracy, lacked reproducibility and depended on high-resolution images such as . This paper proposes an automated Gleason grading method, ProGENET, to accurately predict the grade using low-resolution images such as . This method first divides the patient’s histopathology whole slide image (WSI) into patches. Then, it detects artifacts and tissue-less regions and predicts the patch-wise grade using an ensemble network of CNN and transformer models. The proposed method adapted the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system and achieved 90.8% accuracy in classifying the patches into healthy and Gleason grades through using WSI, outperforming the state-of-the-art accuracy by 27%. Finally, the patient’s grade was determined by combining the patch-wise results. The method was also demonstrated for grading and binary classification of prostate cancer, achieving 93.0% and 99.6% accuracy, respectively. The reproducibility was over 90%. Since the proposed method determined the grades with higher accuracy and reproducibility using low-resolution images, it is more reliable and effective than existing methods and can potentially improve subsequent therapy decisions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Medical Imaging and Analysis · Infrared Thermography in Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer stat facts: common cancer sites. SEER [Online]. [cited 2025 May 15]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/common.html.
2. Automated gleason grading and gleason pattern region segmentation based on deep learning for pathological images of prostate cancer10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3005180 ↗
3. American Cancer Society. Key statistics for prostate cancer [Online]. [cited 2025 May 15]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/about/key-statistics.html.
4. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging10.1016/S0022-5347(17)59889-4 ↗
5. Clinical validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason grading system in a cohort of intermediate and high risk men undergoing radical prostatectomy10.1371/journal.pone.0146189 ↗
6. Multiwavelet grading of pathological images of prostate10.1109/TBME.2003.812194 ↗
7. Multifeature prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading of histological images10.1109/TMI.2007.898536 ↗
8. Evaluation of machine learning techniques for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading
9. Automatic quality evaluation of whole slide images for the practical use of whole slide imaging scanner10.3169/mta.8.252 ↗
10. Computer-aided Gleason grading of prostate cancer histopathological images using texton forests
11. Computerized classification of prostate cancer gleason scores from whole slide images10.1109/TCBB.2019.2941195 ↗
12. Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image gleason grading via local structure modeling
13. Automatic Gleason grading of H and E stained microscopic prostate images using deep convolutional neural networks
14. Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning10.1038/s41598-018-30535-1 ↗
15. Ström P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Solorzano L, Delahunt B, Berney D, et al. Pathologist-level grading of prostate biopsies with artificial intelligence. arXiv:1907.01368. 2019.
16. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9 ↗
17. WeGleNet: a weakly-supervised convolutional neural network for the semantic segmentation of Gleason grades in prostate histology images10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101846 ↗
18. Path R-CNN for prostate cancer diagnosis and gleason grading of histological images10.1109/TMI.2018.2875868 ↗
19. Towards grading gleason score using generically trained deep convolutional neural networks
20. Computer aided analysis of prostate histopathology images to support a refined Gleason grading system
21. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 ↗
22. Deep learning-based gleason grading of prostate cancer from histopathology images—role of multiscale decision aggregation and data augmentation10.1109/JBHI.2019.2944643 ↗
23. DiagSet: a dataset for prostate cancer histopathological image classification10.1038/s41598-024-52183-4 ↗
24. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge10.1038/s41591-021-01620-2 ↗
25. Zuley ML, Jarosz R, Drake BF, Rancilio D, Klim A, Rieger-Christ K, et al. The cancer genome atlas prostate adenocarcinoma collection (TCGA-PRAD) (Version 4) [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive; 2016. doi:10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.YXOGLM4Y.
26. Tissue artifact segmentation and severity assessment for automatic analysis using wsi10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3250556 ↗