journal article·2022-02

Amine-bifunctionalized ZSM-5/SBA-16 composite for CO2 adsorption

Lin Ge, Jianwen Wei, Linlin Geng, Siqi Chen, Lei Liao

Journal of Porous Materials· Volume 29· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

An amine-modified ZSM-5/SBA-16 (ZS) micro-/mesoporous composite was synthesized for CO2 capture using nonionic tri-block copolymer pluronic (F127) as a template, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as a silicon source and ZSM-5 zeolite as part of silicon aluminum source by embedding method. The amine-bifunctionalized samples were prepared by first grafting with aminepropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) and then impregnating with different concentrations of tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA). The amine efficiency, adsorption kinetics, thermal stability, regeneration performance and the effects of impregnated amine loadings (30–60%) and temperatures (30–90 °C) on the CO2 adsorption performance were investigated using a thermal gravimetric analyzer (TGA) in the mixed gases (15 vol% CO2 and the balance of N2). The best adsorbent after modification of ZSM-5/SBA-16 composite material was screened to study CO2 adsorption mechanism and adsorption kinetics. With the increase of the TEPA amount, the adsorption capacity of amine-bifunctionalized material first increased and then decreased. At 90 °C, the bifunctionalized ZSM-5/SBA-16 displayed the highest CO2 adsorption performance of 1.630 mmol/g at the TEPA loading of 55%. The CO2 adsorption mechanism of the bifunctionalized material was the synergistic effect of physical adsorption and chemical adsorption. After five adsorption/desorption cycle regenerations, the saturated adsorption capacity of the composite material was 1.496 mmol/g, which was only 8.2% lower than the original adsorption capacity. The composites exhibited good CO2 adsorption performance, indicating the promising industrial applications for CO2 capture form actual flue gas after desulfurization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Z. Lin, W. Shen, X. Chen, J.-P. Corriou, H. Xi, Appl Surf Sci 529, 147130 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14713010.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147130 ↗
2. E. Perez-Botella, R. Martinez-Franco, N. Gonzalez-Camunas et al., Front Chem 8, 588712 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.58871210.3389/fchem.2020.588712 ↗
3. K.S. Lakhi, A.V. Baskar, J.S.M. Zaidi et al., RSC Adv. 5, 40183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra04730g10.1039/c5ra04730g ↗
4. H.A. Patel, J. Byun, C.T. Yavuz, Chemsuschem 10, 1303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20160154510.1002/cssc.201601545 ↗
5. J. Adánez, A. Abad, T. Mendiara, P. Gayán, L.F. de Diego, F. García-Labiano, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 65, 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.00510.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.005 ↗
6. J. Wang, L. Huang, R. Yang et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee01647e10.1039/c4ee01647e ↗
7. S. Choi, J.H. Drese, C.W. Jones, Chemsuschem 2, 796 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20090003610.1002/cssc.200900036 ↗
8. Q. Shen, X. Li, R. Li, Y. Wu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 17608 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0684910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06849 ↗
9. D.A. Khuong, H.N. Nguyen, T. Tsubota, Biomass Bioenergy 148, 106039 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.10603910.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106039 ↗
10. L. Borchardt, Q.-L. Zhu, M.E. Casco et al., Mater. Today 20, 592 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.00210.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.002 ↗
11. Y. Zhao, J. Zhou, L. Fan et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 19465 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0333810.1021/acs.iecr.9b03338 ↗
12. X. Ren, H. Li, J. Chen et al., Carbon 114, 473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.05610.1016/j.carbon.2016.12.056 ↗
13. H.J. Choi, J.G. Min, S.H. Ahn et al., Mater. Horiz. 7, 1528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0mh00307g10.1039/d0mh00307g ↗
14. Z. Song, Q. Dong, W.L. Xu, F. Zhou, X. Liang, M. Yu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 769 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b1657410.1021/acsami.7b16574 ↗
15. K. Li, J.D. Kress, D.S. Mebane, J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 23683 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0880810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08808 ↗
16. D.S. Mebane, J.D. Kress, C.B. Storlie, D.J. Fauth, M.L. Gray, K. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 26617 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407641710.1021/jp4076417 ↗
17. S. Kim, K.B. Lee, Chem. Eng. J. 356, 964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.20710.1016/j.cej.2018.08.207 ↗
18. Y. Xiao, M. Zhou, G. He, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 14380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0267010.1021/acs.iecr.9b02670 ↗
19. S.C.G. Santos, S.W.M. Machado, A.M. Garrido Pedrosa, M.J.B. Souza, J. Porous Mater. 22, 1145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-015-9990-010.1007/s10934-015-9990-0 ↗
20. H. Thakkar, A. Issa, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Chem. Eng. Technol. 40, 1999 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.20170018810.1002/ceat.201700188 ↗
21. Y. Belmabkhout, R. Serna-Guerrero, A. Sayari, Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 3695 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.04410.1016/j.ces.2010.02.044 ↗
22. Z. Lin, J. Wei, L. Geng, D. Mei, L. Liao, Energy Technol. 6, 1618 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20170078010.1002/ente.201700780 ↗
23. P. Kubisa, S. Penczek, Prog. Polymer Sci. 24, 1409 (1990)10.1016/S0079-6700(99)00028-3 ↗
24. E.S. Sanz-Pérez, A. Arencibia, R. Sanz, G. Calleja, Adsorption 22, 609 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10450-015-9740-210.1007/s10450-015-9740-2 ↗
25. R. Sanz, G. Calleja, A. Arencibia, E.S. Sanz-Pérez, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 209, 165 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.04510.1016/j.micromeso.2014.10.045 ↗
26. P.D. Jadhav, R.V. Chatti, R.B. Biniwale, N.K. Labhsetwar, S. Devotta, S.S. Rayalu, Energy & Fuels 31, 3555 (2007)10.1021/ef070038y ↗
27. T. Liu, H. Wang, Z. Hu, F. Wei, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 316, 110968 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11096810.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110968 ↗
28. C. Bläker, C. Pasel, M. Luckas, F. Dreisbach, D. Bathen, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11020510.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110205 ↗
29. D. Carta, T. Montini, M.F. Casula et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 20024 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta03640j10.1039/c7ta03640j ↗
30. J. Wei, J. Shi, H. Pan, W. Zhao, Q. Ye, Y. Shi, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 116, 394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.02810.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.028 ↗
31. X. Wang, J. Mei, Z. Zhao et al., ACS Catal. 8, 1891 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0414710.1021/acscatal.7b04147 ↗
32. N. Zucchetto, M.J. Reber, L. Pestalozzi, R. Schmid, A. Neels, D. Brühwiler, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 257, 232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.04610.1016/j.micromeso.2017.08.046 ↗
33. M. Choi, K. Na, J. Kim, Y. Sakamoto, O. Terasaki, R. Ryoo, Nature 461, 246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0828810.1038/nature08288 ↗
34. A. Kumar, N. Ranga, S. Duhan, R. Thakur, J. Porous Mater. 27, 1431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-020-00910-310.1007/s10934-020-00910-3 ↗
35. E.S. Gomes, D.A.G. Aranda, M.M. Pereira, B. Louis, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 263, 251 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.12.02210.1016/j.micromeso.2017.12.022 ↗
36. H. Chaudhuri, S. Dash, A. Sarkar, RSC Adv. 6, 99444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21480k10.1039/c6ra21480k ↗
37. M. Naghiloo, M. Yousefpour, M.S. Nourbakhsh, Z. Taherian, J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 74, 537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3631-610.1007/s10971-015-3631-6 ↗
38. A. Feliczak-Guzik, B. Jadach, H. Piotrowska, M. Murias, J. Lulek, I. Nowak, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 220, 231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.00610.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.006 ↗
39. Y. Jiang, Q. Gao, H. Yu, Y. Chen, F. Deng, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 103, 316 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.02410.1016/j.micromeso.2007.02.024 ↗
40. A.A. Ahmed, Z.H. Yamani, Mater. Chem. Phys. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12418110.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.124181 ↗
41. N. Horri, E.S. Sanz-Pérez, A. Arencibia, R. Sanz, N. Frini-Srasra, E. Srasra, Appl. Clay Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.10519510.1016/j.clay.2019.105195 ↗
42. J. Yu, Y. Zhai, S.S.C. Chuang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 4052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0511410.1021/acs.iecr.7b05114 ↗
43. X. Jiang, Y. Kong, Z. Zhao, X. Shen, RSC Adv. 10, 25911 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra04497k10.1039/d0ra04497k ↗
44. W. Wilfong, B. Kail, B. Howard, T. F. Aquino, S .T. Estevam, M. Gray, Energy Technol. 5, 228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.20160031910.1002/ente.201600319 ↗