Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making for Decision Support in Port Capacity燯pgrade
Source abstract
Abstract
In many port capacity upgrade projects, choosing a supplier of equipment is a complicated decision, project managers must consider many criteria to choose a supplier to ensure the project is completed on time, optimal in terms of benefit and cost. Therefore, selecting the equipment supplier in this project is a multi-criteria decision-making process. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is applied in many fields to select the optimal solution, but there are very few studies using the MCDM model to support project managers in evaluating and selecting optimal solutions in port capacity upgrade project. In this research, the authors combine Fuzzy Analytic Network Process model and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment concepts to develop a decision support system in port capacity upgrade project. The scientific and practical contribution of this study is to successfully propose a decision support model in a fuzzy environment. The results of the study will be a useful guideline to assist decision makers in port capacity upgrading projects in Taiwan as well as in other countries around the world.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Quality Function Deployment in Product Design · Maritime Ports and Logistics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. C. V. Chuyen, “Danh sách cảng biển tại Đài loan,” Cuocvanchuyen.vn. [Online]. Available: https://cuocvanchuyen.vn/tin-tuc/danh-sach-cang-bien-tai-taiwan-dai-loan--185.html.
2. F. Bahtić, “Taiwan to invest $1.37 billion to upgrade seven commercial ports,” Offshore-energy.biz, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.offshore-energy.biz/taiwan-invests-1-37-billion-to-upgrade-7-commercial-ports/.
3. H. Machine, “Cần Cẩu giàn container,” hndfcrane.com, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.hndfcrane.com/vi/container-gantry-cranes/.
4. An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.024 ↗
5. Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organization10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.057 ↗
6. Two-stage solution approach for supplier selection: A case study in a Taiwan automotive industry10.1080/0951192X.2012.685762 ↗
7. A Hyper-hybrid fuzzy decision-making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: A case study of Malaysian palm oil industry
8. Supplier selection: A fuzzy-ANP approach10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.317 ↗
9. Integrated FAANP-f-MIGP model for supplier selection in the renewable energy sector10.3846/16111699.2017.1325777 ↗
10. A fuzzy ANP model for supplier selection as applied to IC packaging10.1007/s10845-010-0448-6 ↗
11. An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process10.1007/s10845-011-0551-3 ↗
12. Prioritizing green supplier selection criteria using fuzzy analytical network process10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.044 ↗
13. A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119517 ↗
14. Sustainable supplier selection process in edible oil production by a hybrid fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and green data envelopment analysis for the SMES food processing industry10.3390/math6120302 ↗
15. A hybrid fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach for supplier evaluation and selection in the rice supply chain10.3390/sym10060221 ↗
16. A fuzzy ANP approach to shipyard location selection10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.059 ↗
17. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 ↗
18. Hwang · A State-of-the-Art Survey
19. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making10.20885/informatika.vol3.iss1.art3 ↗
20. Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS – a case study of Indian cement industry10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0041 ↗
21. An extension of best-worst method with D numbers: Application in evaluation of renewable energy resources10.1016/j.seta.2020.100771 ↗