journal article·2023Open access

Quantum Oblivious Transfer with Reusable Bell State

Shu-Yu Kuo, Kuo-Chun Tseng, Yao-Hsin Chou, Fan-Hsun Tseng

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 74· Issue 1

Abstract

In cryptography, oblivious transfer (OT) is an important multi-party cryptographic primitive and protocol, that is suitable for many upper-layer applications, such as secure computation, remote coin-flipping, electrical contract signing and exchanging secrets simultaneously. However, some no-go theorems have been established, indicating that one-out-of-two quantum oblivious transfer (QOT) protocols with unconditional security are impossible. Fortunately, some one-out-of-two QOT protocols using the concept of Crépeau’s reduction have been demonstrated not to conform to Lo’s no-go theorem, but these protocols require more quantum resources to generate classical keys using all-or-nothing QOT to construct one-out-of-two QOT. This paper proposes a novel and efficient one-out-of-two QOT which uses quantum resources directly instead of wasting unnecessary resources to generate classical keys. The proposed protocol is not covered by Lo’s no-go theorem, and it is able to check the sender’s loyalty and avoid the attack from the receiver. Moreover, the entangled state of the proposed protocol is reusable, so it can provide more services for the participants when necessary. Compared with other QOT protocols, the proposed protocol is more secure, efficient, and flexible, which not only can prevent external and internal attacks, but also reduce the required resources and resource distribution time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. How to exchange secrets by oblivious transfer
2. A randomized protocol for signing contracts10.1145/3812.3818 ↗
3. Crépeau · Proc · 1987 · 350
4. Yadav · ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) · 2021
5. Algorithm for quantum computation: Discrete logarithms and factoring
6. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search
7. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
8. Unconditional security of quantum key distribution over arbitrarily long distances10.1126/science.283.5410.2050 ↗
9. Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.441 ↗
10. Achieving oblivious transfer using weakened security assumptions
11. Bennett · Proc · 1991 · 351
12. Quantum oblivious transfer10.1080/09500349414552291 ↗
13. Security of quantum protocols against coherent measurements
14. Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3414 ↗
15. Is quantum bit commitment really possible?10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3410 ↗
16. Insecurity of quantum secure computations10.1103/PhysRevA.56.1154 ↗
17. Communication channels analogous to one out of two oblivious transfers based on quantum uncertainty10.1103/PhysRevA.66.052316 ↗
18. Communication channels analogous to one out of two oblivious transfers based on quantum uncertainty. II. closing EPR-type loopholes10.1103/PhysRevA.67.034301 ↗
19. Oblivious transfer and quantum non-locality
20. Popescu · Proc · 1998 · 383
21. Oblivious transfer using quantum entanglement10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012331 ↗
22. Nonequivalence of two flavors of oblivious transfer at the quantum level10.1103/PhysRevA.73.044304 ↗
23. Quantum oblivious transfer using tripartite entangled states
24. Implications of superstrong non-locality for cryptography10.1098/rspa.2006.1663 ↗
25. Quantum entanglement and non-locality based secure computation for future communication10.1049/iet-ifs.2009.0143 ↗
26. Can relativistic bit commitment lead to secure quantum oblivious transfer?10.1140/epjd/e2015-50882-4 ↗
27. Bit-string oblivious transfer based on quantum state computational distinguishability10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042306 ↗
28. Quantum bit string commitment10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.237901 ↗
29. Comment on “Bit-string oblivious transfer based on quantum state computational distinguishability10.1103/PhysRevA.92.046301 ↗
30. Reply to “comment on ‘Bit-string oblivious transfer based on quantum state computational distinguishability’10.1103/PhysRevA.92.046302 ↗
31. 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfer using a flawed bit-string quantum protocol10.1103/PhysRevA.95.042324 ↗
32. Quantum oblivious transfer with an untrusted third party10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.06.023 ↗
33. Quantum oblivious transfer based on a quantum symmetrically private information retrieval protocol10.1007/s10773-014-2286-3 ↗
34. Quantum oblivious transfer with relaxed constraints on the receiver10.1007/s11128-015-1013-1 ↗
35. Flexible quantum oblivious transfer10.1007/s10773-016-3270-x ↗
36. Practical quantum all-or-nothing oblivious transfer protocol10.1007/s11128-013-0550-8 ↗
37. Optimal bounds for semi-honest quantum oblivious transfer
38. Secure quantum weak oblivious transfer against individual measurements10.1007/s11128-015-0970-8 ↗
39. Oblivious transfer and quantum channels as communication resources10.1007/s11047-012-9350-9 ↗
40. Practical quantum oblivious transfer with a single photon10.1088/1555-6611/aafd28 ↗
41. A novel application of probabilistic teleportation: p-Rabin quantum oblivious transfer of a qubit10.1007/s10773-019-04206-4 ↗
42. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 ↗
43. Communication via one-and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2881 ↗
44. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5932 ↗
45. Quantum key distribution via quantum encryption10.1103/PhysRevA.64.024302 ↗
46. Quantum asymmetric cryptography with symmetric keys10.1007/s11433-009-0299-3 ↗
47. Deterministic secure direct communication using entanglement10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.187902 ↗
48. Quantum key distribution with high loss: Toward global secure communication10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.057901 ↗