Virtual Reality-Based Random Dot Kinematogram
Source abstract
Abstract
This research implements a random dot kinematogram (RDK) using virtual reality (VR) and analyzes the results based on normal subjects. Visual motion perception is one of visual functions localized to a specific cortical area, the human motion perception area (human analogue for the middle temporal/middle superior temporal area) located in the parieto–occipito–temporal junction of the human brain. The RDK measures visual motion perception capabilities. The stimuli in conventional RDK methods are presented using a monitor screen, so these devices require a spacious dark room for installation and use. Recently, VR technology has been implemented in different medical domains. The test method proposed in this study include a VR-based RDK that can independently measure human motion perception abilities without any spatial constraints via a VR head-mounted display. Subsequently, the VR-based RDK was implemented, and the visual perception abilities of the normal subjects were measured based on varying coherences. In both screen- and VR-based RDK tests, the easier the stimulus is, the higher the correct answer rate and the shorter the reaction time. No significant differences in coherence thresholds were observed between the two test methods. The VR-based RDK proposed in this study can be used as a diagnosis tool for visual motion perception and neurodegenerative disorders affecting the posterior region of the brain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Vision and Imaging · Visual perception and processing mechanisms · Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions10.1145/988525.988533 ↗
2. A direct demonstration of functional specialization in the human visual cortex10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00641.1991 ↗
3. Area V5 of the human brain: Evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging10.1093/cercor/3.2.79 ↗
4. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03215.1995 ↗
5. The activity in human areas V1/V2, V3, and V5 during the perception of coherent and incoherent motion10.1006/nimg.1996.0246 ↗
6. Visual motion and the human brain: What has neuroimaging told us?10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00022-1 ↗
7. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage10.1093/brain/106.2.313 ↗
8. Impairment of the perception of second order motion but not first order motion in a patient with unilateral focal brain damage10.1098/rspb.1996.0180 ↗
9. The characteristics of residual motion perception in the hemifield contralateral to lateral occipital lesions in humans10.1093/brain/116.6.1337 ↗
10. Impaired visual motion perception in the contralateral hemifield following unilateral posterior cerebral lesions in humans10.1093/brain/116.6.1303 ↗
11. Selective impairment of visual motion interpretation following lesions of the right occipito-parietal area in humans10.1007/BF00200800 ↗
12. Motion perception and Alzheimer’s disease10.1093/geronj/49.2.P52 ↗
13. Perception of movement and shape in Alzheimer’s disease10.1093/brain/121.12.2259 ↗
14. Impaired perception of biological motion in Parkinson’s disease10.1037/neu0000276 ↗
15. Global motion perception deficits in autism are reflected as early as primary visual cortex10.1093/brain/awu189 ↗
16. Effect analysis of virtual-reality vestibular rehabilitation based on eye-tracking
17. Generating a ball sport scene in a virtual environment
18. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.013 ↗
19. Immersion of virtual reality for rehabilitation-Review10.1016/j.apergo.2018.01.009 ↗
20. Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: An updated evidence-based systematic review10.1016/j.physio.2016.08.004 ↗