journal article·2020-06

A lithium–aluminosilicate zeolite membrane for separation of CO2 from simulated blast furnace gas

Priyanka Roy, Nandini Das

Journal of Porous Materials· Volume 27· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, for the first time, the small pore size (0.28 × 0.37 nm) Li–aluminosilicate zeolite membrane was synthesized for separation of CO2 from H2–CO2 and H2–CO2–N2–CO (simulated blast furnace gas) gas mixtures. Li–aluminosilicate membranes were prepared on porous clay alumina tubes by sonication mediated hydrothermal method using pre synthesized zeolite powders as seeds. The zeolite formation was confirmed by X-ray diffraction pattern and FESEM analysis. The scanning electron micrograph of the membrane, suggested the uniformity of the dense structure of the membrane. Single-gas and mixed-gas permeation experiments through membranes were carried out at 25 °C using H2, CO2 and N2 single-component gases and mixture of H2–CO2, H2–CO2–N2–CO for simulated blast furnace gas composition. Synthesized Li–aluminosilicate zeolite shows appreciable CO2 adsorption capacity at liquid nitrogen temperature compared with other reported zeolites. In case of single gas permeation, membrane shows usual pattern of permeation. For mixture gas, separation efficiency of Li–zeolite membrane increased abruptly compared to the other zeolite membranes. The maximum CO2–H2, CO2–N2 and CO2–CO separation selectivities were found to be 78, 8.7 and 67.3 respectively, with permeance of H2, CO2 and N2 2.21 × 10−7, 1.01 × 10−7 and 0.8 × 10−7 mol m−2 s−1 Pa−1 at 25 °C respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. K. Aasberg-Petersen, C. Stub Nielsen, I. Dybkjaer, J. Perregaard, Large scale methanol production from natural gas. HaldorTopsoe 22, 1–14 (2008)
2. A.L. Kohl, R. Nielson, Gas Purification (Gulf Publishing, Houston, 1997), pp. 1081–1086
3. S. Sircar, T.C. Golden, Purification of hydrogen by pressure swing adsorption. Sep. Sci. Technol. 35, 667–687 (2000)10.1081/SS-100100183 ↗
4. J. Stocker, M. Whysall, G.Q. Miller, 30 Years of PSA Technology for Hydrogen Purification, 5th edn. (UOP LLC, Des Plaines, 1998)
5. R. Bredesen, K. Jordal, O. Bolland, High temperature membranes in power generation with CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. Process. 43, 1129–1158 (2004)10.1016/j.cep.2003.11.011 ↗
6. S. Adhikari, S. Fernando, Hydrogen membrane separation techniques. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 875–881 (2006)10.1021/ie050644l ↗
7. R.W. Spillman, W.R. Grace, Economics of gas separation membranes. Chem. Eng. Prog. 85, 41–62 (1989)
8. L.C. Boudreau, J.A. Kuck, M. Tsapatsis, Deposition of oriented zeolite A films: in situ and secondary growth. J. Membr. Sci. 152, 41–59 (1999)10.1016/S0376-7388(98)00166-5 ↗
9. Z. Lai, G. Bonilla, I. Diaz, J.G. Nery, K. Sujaoti, M.A. Amat, E. Kokkoli, O. Terasaki, R.W. Thompson, M. Tsapatsis, D.G. Valchos, Microstructural optimization of a zeolite membrane for organic vapor separation. Science 300, 456–460 (2003)10.1126/science.1082169 ↗
10. M. Macchione, J.C. Jansen, E. Drioli, The dry phase inversion technique as a tool to produce highly efficient asymmetric gas separation membranes of modified PEEK influence of temperature and air circulation. Desalination 192, 132–141 (2006)10.1016/j.desal.2005.09.020 ↗
11. G.A. Ozin, A. Kuperman, A. Stein, Advanced zeolite materials science. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 28, 359–376 (1989)10.1002/anie.198903591 ↗
12. A. Tavolaro, E. Drioli, Zeolite membranes. Adv. Mater. 11, 975–996 (1999)10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199908)11:12<975::AID-ADMA975>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
13. A.S. Huang, F.Y. Liang, F. Steinbach, J. Caro, Preparation and separation properties of LTA membranes by using 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane as covalent Linker. J. Membr. Sci. 350, 5–9 (2010)10.1016/j.memsci.2009.12.029 ↗
14. R.C. Lochan, M. Head-Gordon, Computational studies of molecular hydrogen binding affinities: the role of dispersion forces, electrostatics, and orbital interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1357–1370 (2006)10.1039/b515409j ↗
15. IZA, http://europe.iza-structure.org/IZA-SC/framework.php?STC=BIK. Accessed 20 July 2019
16. D.J. Drysdale, A synthesis of bikitaite. Am. Miner. 56, 1718–1723 (1971)
17. V.P. Valtchev, L. Tosheva, K.N. Bozhilov, Synthesis of zeolite nanocrystals at room temperature. Langmuir 21, 10724–10729 (2005)10.1021/la050323e ↗
18. Y. Huang, D.H. Dong, J.F. Yao, L. He, J. Ho, C.K. Kong, A.J. Hill, H. Wang, In situ crystallization of macroporous monoliths with hollow NaP zeolite structure. Chem. Mater. 22, 5271–5278 (2010)10.1021/cm101408n ↗
19. J.C. Yu, J.G. Yu, W.K. Ho, L. Zhang, Preparation of highly photocatalytic active nano-Sized TiO2 particles via ultrasonic irradiation. Chem. Commun. 19, 1942–1943 (2001)10.1039/b105471f ↗
20. D.S. Zhang, H.X. Fu, L.Y. Shi, C. Pan, Q. Li, Y. Chu, W. Yu, Synthesis of CeO2 nanorods via ultrasonication assisted by polyethylene glycol. Inorg. Chem. 46, 2446–2451 (2007)10.1021/ic061697d ↗
21. J.H. Bang, K.S. Suslick, Applications of ultrasound to the synthesis of nanostructured materials. Adv. Mater. 22, 1039–1059 (2010)10.1002/adma.200904093 ↗
22. Y.Q. Wang, X.H. Tang, L.X. Yin, W. Huang, R. Hacohen, A. Gedanken, Sonochemical synthesis of mesoporous titanium oxide with wormhole-like framework structures. Adv. Mater. 12, 1183–1186 (2000)10.1002/1521-4095(200008)12:16<1183::AID-ADMA1183>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
23. P. Roy, N. Das, Ultrasonic assisted synthesis of bikitaite zeolite: a potential material for hydrogen storage application. Ultrason. Sonochem. 36, 466–473 (2017)10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.12.032 ↗
24. P. Roy, N. Das, Synthesis of NaX zeolite-graphite amine fiber composite membrane: role of graphite amine in membrane formation for H2/CO2 separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 480, 934–944 (2019)10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.038 ↗
25. https://srdata.nist.gov/xps/ElmSpectralSrch.aspx?selEnergy=PE. Accessed 20 July 2019
26. M.C. Capel-Sanchez, L. Barrio, J.M. Campos-Martin, J.L. Fierro, Silylation and surface properties of chemically grafted hydrophobic silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 277, 146–153 (2004)10.1016/j.jcis.2004.04.055 ↗
27. L. Sandstrom, E. Sjoberg, J. Hedlund, Very high flux MFI membrane for CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 380, 232–240 (2011)10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.011 ↗
28. M. Hong, S. Li, J.L. Falconer, R.D. Noble, Hydrogen purification using a SAPO-34 membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 307, 277–283 (2008)10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.031 ↗
29. W. Mei, Y. Du, T. Wu, F. Gao, B. Wang, J. Duan, J. Zhou, R. Zhou, High-flux CHA zeolite membranes for H2 separations. J. Membr. Sci. 565, 358–369 (2018)10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.025 ↗
30. D. Korelskiy, P. Ye, S. Fouladvand, S. Karimi, E. Sjoberg, J. Hedlund, Efficient ceramic zeolite membranes for CO2/H2 separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 12500–12506 (2015)10.1039/C5TA02152A ↗