Survey on Deep Learning Approaches for Detection of Email Security Threat
Source abstract
Abstract
Emailing is among the cheapest and most easily accessible platforms, and covers every idea of the present century like banking, personal login database, academic information, invitation, marketing, advertisement, social engineering, model creation on cyber-based technologies, etc. The uncontrolled development and easy access to the internet are the reasons for the increased insecurity in email communication. Therefore, this review paper aims to investigate deep learning approaches for detecting the threats associated with e-mail security. This study compiles the literature related to the deep learning methodologies, which are applicable for providing safety in the field of cyber security of email in different organizations. Relevant data were extracted from different research depositories. The paper discusses various solutions for handling these threats. Different challenges and issues are also investigated for e-mail security threats including social engineering, malware, spam, and phishing in the existing solutions to identify the core current problem and set the road for future studies. The review analysis showed that communication media is the common platform for attackers to conduct fraudulent activities via spoofed e-mails and fake websites and this research has combined the merit and demerits of the deep learning approaches adaption in email security threat by the usage of models and technologies. The study highlighted the contrasts of deep learning approaches in detecting email security threats. This review study has set criteria to include studies that deal with at least one of the six machine models in cyber security.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Spam and Phishing Detection · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Deep learning for insider threat detection: Review, challenges, and opportunities10.1016/j.cose.2021.102221 ↗
2. Insider threat detection with a deep neural network
3. High precision detection of business e-mail compromise
4. FBI. “Business e-mail compromise,” The 12-billion-dollar scam, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.ic3.gov/media/2018/180712.aspx
5. J. J. Roberts, “Facebook and google were victims of $100m payment scam,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://fortune.com/2017/04/27/facebook-google-rimasauskas/
6. That ain’t you: Blocking spearphishing through behavioral modeling
7. A. Bhowmick and S. M. Hazarika, “Machine learning for e-mail spam filtering: Review, techniques and trends,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arXiv:1606.01042. 10.1007/978-981-10-4765-7_6110.1007/978-981-10-4765-7_61 ↗
8. Deep learning approach for intelligent intrusion detection system10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895334 ↗
9. Analysis of spam email filtering through naïve bayes algorithm across different datasets
10. Malicious URL detection using logistic regression
11. A survey of deep learning methods for cyber security10.3390/info10040122 ↗
12. A review on security challenges in internet of things (IoT)
13. Machine learning techniques for spam detection in email and IoT platforms: Analysis and research challenges10.1155/2022/1862888 ↗
14. S. Sheng, B. Wardman, G. Warner, L. Cranor, J. Hong et al., “An empirical analysis of phishing blacklists,” 2009. 10.1109/ecrime.2009.5342608
15. Semantic feature selection for text with application to phishing email detection10.1007/978-3-319-12160-4_27 ↗
16. G. Park and J. M. Taylor, “Using syntactic features for phishing detection,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://arXiv:1506.00037. 10.1063/pt.5.028530
17. Detecting phishing emails the natural language way10.1007/978-3-642-33167-1_47 ↗
18. PED-ML: Phishing e-mail detection using classical machine learning techniques
19. Hybrid feature selection for phishing e-mail detection
20. New filtering approaches for phishing email10.3233/JCS-2010-0371 ↗
21. Email spam filtering technique from various perspectives using machine learning algorithms, in data driven approach towards disruptive technologies
22. Detection and prevention of spam mail with semantics-based text classification of collaborative and content filtering, in journal of physics
23. Learning from the ones that Got away: Detecting new forms of phishing attacks10.1109/TDSC.2018.2864993 ↗
24. J. Barnes, R. Klinger and S. S. I. Walde, “Projecting embeddings for domain adaptation: Joint modeling of sentiment analysis in diverse domains,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arXiv:1806.04381. 10.18653/v1/p18-1231
25. Knowledge-oriented convolutional neural network for causal relation extraction from natural language texts10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.009 ↗
26. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate
27. Hybrid email spam detection model using artificial intelligence10.18178/ijmlc.2020.10.2.937 ↗
28. The effects of features selection methods on spam review detection performance
29. A machine learning approach towards phishing e-mail detection
30. Unsupervised feature learning for spam email filtering10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.01.004 ↗
31. Srinivasan · Title of Machine Intelligence and Big Data Analytics for Cybersecurity Applications · 2020 · 919 · 16110.1007/978-3-030-57024-8_7 ↗
32. Discovering patterns using feature selection techniques and correlation10.1007/978-3-030-38040-3_94 ↗
33. Deepti-PhishNet: Applying deep neural networks for phishing e-mail detection
34. Machine learning in agriculture: A review10.3390/s18082674 ↗
35. Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 ↗
36. Machine learning in medicine10.1056/NEJMra1814259 ↗
37. Machine learning and deep learning in cyber security for IoT
38. Planetscope nanosatellites image classification using machine learning10.32604/csse.2022.023221 ↗
39. CNN based automated weed detection system using UAV imagery10.32604/csse.2022.023016 ↗
40. SMOTEDNN: A novel model for air pollution forecasting and AQI classification10.32604/cmc.2022.021968 ↗
41. Real-time forecasts and risk assessment of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) cases: A data-driven analysis10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109850 ↗
42. Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: A comprehensive review10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014 ↗
43. Attention-based label consistency for semi-supervised deep learning based image classification10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.133 ↗
44. Detecting geothermal anomalies using multi-temporal thermal infrared remote sensing data in the Damxung–Yangbajain Basin, Qinghai–Tibet Plateau10.3390/rs15184473 ↗
45. Moderate resolution LAI prediction using Sentinel-2 satellite data and indirect field measurements in Sikkim Himalaya10.1007/s10661-022-10530-w ↗
46. Estimation of ice thickness using surface velocities and slope: case study at Gangotri Glacier, India10.3189/2014JoG13J078 ↗
47. Sentiment analysis using deep learning architectures: A review10.1007/s10462-019-09794-5 ↗
48. An ensemble of fine-tuned convolutional neural networks for medical image classification10.1109/JBHI.2016.2635663 ↗
49. Understanding insider threat attacks using natural language processing: Automatically mapping organic narrative reports to existing insider threat frameworks
50. Classification of botnet attacks in IoT using a convolutional neural network
51. A survey of CNN-based network intrusion detection10.3390/app12168162 ↗
52. New types of deep neural network learning for speech recognition and related applications: An overview
53. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 ↗
54. Restricted boltzmann machines for collaborative filtering
55. Extracting and composing robust features with denoising auto encoders
56. Feature selection based on artificial bee colony and gradient boosting decision tree10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.036 ↗
57. Detecting malicious domain names using deep learning approaches at scale10.3233/JIFS-169431 ↗
58. Evaluating effectiveness of shallow and deep networks to intrusion detection system
59. DeepMalNet: Evaluating shallow and deep networks for static PE malware detection10.1016/j.icte.2018.10.006 ↗
60. S.P.O.O.F Net: Syntactic patterns for identification of ominous online factors
61. Detecting phishing e-mail using machine learning techniques
62. Repke · Advances in Information Retrieval · 2018 · 10772 · 11410.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_9 ↗
63. Deep learning-based phishing e-mail detection
64. NMT-Keras: A very flexible toolkit with a focus on interactive NMT and online learning10.2478/pralin-2018-0010 ↗
65. Phishing detection method based on borderline-smote deep belief network
66. Classifying phishing URLs using recurrent neural networks
67. Detection of online phishing email using dynamic evolving neural network based on reinforcement learning10.1016/j.dss.2018.01.001 ↗
68. Recurrent convolutional neural network for sequential recommendation
69. Interactive visualization and manipulation of attention-based neural machine translation
70. Convolutional neural networks with alternately updated clique
71. Image caption generation with high-level image features10.1016/j.patrec.2019.03.021 ↗
72. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–Decoder for statistical machine translation
73. Human versus machine attention in document classification: A dataset with crowdsourced annotations
74. Email phishing detection and prevention by using data mining techniques
75. PhishFry—A proactive approach to classify phishing sites using SCIKIT learn
76. Detection of phishing attacks
77. H. V. Mahesh, “E-mail classification tool to detect phishing using hybrid features,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, 2019.
78. A comprehensive survey for intelligent spam email detection10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2954791 ↗
79. Evaluating deep learning approaches to characterize and classify the DGAs at scale10.3233/JIFS-169423 ↗
80. J. Fowler, “Modern e-mail security concerns: Threats to e-mail privacy and privacy solutions,” Ph.D. dissertation, Kalamazoo College, USA, 2017.
81. Identifying email threats using predictive analysis
82. Secure email gateway
83. Spam and phishing in 2018
84. Perceptual representation of spam and phishing e-mails10.1002/acp.3594 ↗
85. User characteristics that influence judgment of social engineering attacks in social networks10.1186/s13673-018-0128-7 ↗
86. Learning to ignore: A case study of organization-wide bulk email effectiveness
87. A survey of machine and deep learning methods for internet of things (IoT) security10.1109/COMST.2020.2988293 ↗
88. A study on email spam filtering techniques10.5120/1645-2213 ↗
89. Stacking classifiers for anti-spam filtering of e-mail10.1023/A:1022948414856 ↗
90. A. Chavez, “TF-IDF classification based multinomial naïve bayes model for spam filtering,” M.S. dissertation, National College of Ireland, Ireland, 2020.
91. Adaptive filtering of spam
92. Multimodal spam classification using deep learning techniques
93. SMS spam detection and comparison of various machine learning algorithms
94. Security awareness of computer users: A phishing threat avoidance perspective10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.046 ↗
95. M. Delany, “Domain-based email authentication using public keys advertised in the DNS (DomainKeys),” RFC 4870, 2007. 10.17487/RFC487010.17487/rfc4870 ↗
96. Adida · DIMACS Wkshp on Theft in E-Commerce, Lightweight Email Signatures (Extended Abstract) · 2005 · 4116 · 288
97. Online detection and prevention of phishing attacks
98. Phishing e-mail detection based on structural properties
99. Imbalanced learning in massive phishing datasets
100. Adversarial examples: Attacks and defenses for deep learning10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2886017 ↗