journal article·2021Open access

Epithelial Layer Estimation Using Curvatures and Textural Features for Dysplastic Tissue Detection

Afzan Adam, Abdul Hadi Abd Rahman, Nor Samsiah Sani, Zaid Abdi Alkareem Alyessari, Nur Jumaadzan Zaleha Mamat, Basela Hasan

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 67· Issue 1

Abstract

Boundary effect in digital pathology is a phenomenon where the tissue shapes of biopsy samples get distorted during the sampling process. The morphological pattern of an epithelial layer is greatly affected. Theoretically, the shape deformation model can normalise the distortions, but it needs a 2D image. Curvatures theory, on the other hand, is not yet tested on digital pathology images. Therefore, this work proposed a curvature detection to reduce the boundary effects and estimates the epithelial layer. The boundary effect on the tissue surfaces is normalised using the frequency of a curve deviates from being a straight line. The epithelial layer’s depth is estimated from the tissue edges and the connected nucleolus only. Then, the textural and spatial features along the estimated layer are used for dysplastic tissue detection. The proposed method achieved better performance compared to the whole tissue regions in terms of detecting dysplastic tissue. The result shows a leap of kappa points from fair to a substantial agreement with the expert’s ground truth classification. The improved results demonstrate that curvatures have been effective in reducing the boundary effects on the epithelial layer of tissue. Thus, quantifying and classifying the morphological patterns for dysplasia can be automated. The textural and spatial features on the detected epithelial layer can capture the changes in tissue.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. The use of digital microscope in oral pathology teaching
2. The incidence of esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia in barrett’s esophagus: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1093/aje/kwn121 ↗
3. ACG clinical guideline: Diagnosis and management of barrett’s esophagus10.1038/ajg.2015.322 ↗
4. Biomarkers in barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: Predictors of progression and prognosis10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5669 ↗
5. A tissue systems pathology test detects abnormalities associated with prevalent high-grade dysplasia and esophageal cancer in barrett’s esophagus10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0640 ↗
6. Increased detection of barrett’s esophagus and esophageal dysplasia with adjunctive use of wide-area transepithelial sample with three-dimensional computer-assisted analysis (wats)10.1177/2050640617746298 ↗
7. Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00013.x ↗
8. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: An attempt to understand the sources of variation10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.03.009 ↗
9. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Correlation of pathological and endoscopic findings10.1111/codi.12667 ↗
10. Inter-observer and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia10.4103/0973-029X.185928 ↗
11. Interdependence theory of tissue failure: Bulk and boundary effect
12. Histopathologist features predictive of diagnostic concordance at expert level among a large international sample of pathologists diagnosing barrett’s dysplasia using digital pathology10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318985 ↗
13. Current challenges & diagnostic pitfalls in the grading of dysplasia in oral potentially malignant disorders: A review10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.09.005 ↗
14. Dysplasia in barrett’s oesophagus: P53 immunostaining is more reproducible than haematoxylin and eosin diagnosis and improves overall reliability, while grading is poorly reproducible10.1111/his.12956 ↗
15. A. Adam, “Computer-aided dysplasia grading for barrett’s oesophagus virtual slides,” Ph.D. dissertation, School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2015.
16. Geometrical vs spatial features analysis of overlap red blood cell algorithm
17. Iterative randomised irregular circular algorithm for proliferation rate estimation in brain tumour Ki-67 histology images10.1016/j.eswa.2015.11.012 ↗
18. A hierarchical classifier for multiclass prostate histopathology image gleason grading10.32890/jict2018.17.2.7 ↗
19. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitised histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts10.1016/j.media.2018.09.005 ↗
20. Deep learning-based gleason grading of prostate cancer from histopathology images–-role of multiscale decision aggregation and data augmentation10.1109/JBHI.2019.2944643 ↗
21. The classification of endoscopy images with persistent homology10.1016/j.patrec.2015.12.012 ↗
22. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology–-new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y ↗
23. Automated grading of breast cancer histopathology using cascaded ensemble with combination of multi-level image features10.1016/j.neucom.2016.05.084 ↗
24. Whole slide imaging and its applications to histopathological studies of liver disorders10.3389/fmed.2019.00310 ↗
25. Barrett’s esophagus: Diagnostic challenges and recent developments10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2009.02.004 ↗
26. Diagnosis and grading dysplasia in barrett’s oesophagus10.1136/jcp.2005.035337 ↗
27. Architectural analysis of oral cancer, dysplastic and normal epithelia10.1002/cyto.a.20082 ↗
28. Automated grading of prostate cancer using architectural and textural image features
29. High-throughput prostate cancer gland detection, segmentation, and classification from digitised needle core biopsies
30. Deep learning for tissue microarray image-based outcome prediction in patients with colorectal cancer
31. Hough-CNN: Deep learning for segmentation of deep brain regions in MRI and ultrasound10.1016/j.cviu.2017.04.002 ↗
32. An algorithm for learning shape and appearance models without annotations10.1016/j.media.2019.04.008 ↗
33. The deformable most-likely-point paradigm10.1016/j.media.2019.04.013 ↗
34. Quantitative architectural analysis of bronchial intraepithelial neoplasia10.1117/12.384231 ↗
35. Segmentation of tissue architecture by distance graph matching10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19990101)35:1<11::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
36. Tracking with virtual slides: A tool to study diagnostic error in histopathology10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03325.x ↗
37. Grading dysplasia in barrett’s oesophagus virtual pathology slides with cluster co-occurrence matrices
38. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8 ↗
39. Artificial intelligence and digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities10.4103/jpi.jpi_53_18 ↗
40. Voice pathology detection and classification using convolutional neural network model10.3390/app10113723 ↗
41. Decision-level fusion scheme for nasopharyngeal carcinoma identification using machine learning techniques10.1007/s00521-018-3882-6 ↗