A Self-Learning Data-Driven Development of Failure Criteria of Unknown Anisotropic Ductile Materials with Deep Learning Neural Network
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper first proposes a new self-learning data-driven methodology that can develop the failure criteria of unknown anisotropic ductile materials from the minimal number of experimental tests. Establishing failure criteria of anisotropic ductile materials requires time-consuming tests and manual data evaluation. The proposed method can overcome such practical challenges. The methodology is formalized by combining four ideas: 1) The deep learning neural network (DLNN)-based material constitutive model, 2) Self-learning inverse finite element (SELIFE) simulation, 3) Algorithmic identification of failure points from the self-learned stress-strain curves and 4) Derivation of the failure criteria through symbolic regression of the genetic programming. Stress update and the algorithmic tangent operator were formulated in terms of DLNN parameters for nonlinear finite element analysis. Then, the SELIFE simulation algorithm gradually makes the DLNN model learn highly complex multi-axial stress and strain relationships, being guided by the experimental boundary measurements. Following the failure point identification, a self-learning data-driven failure criteria are eventually developed with the help of a reliable symbolic regression algorithm. The methodology and the self-learning data-driven failure criteria were verified by comparing with a reference failure criteria and simulating with different materials orientations, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980515)42:1<105::AID-NME356>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
2. A hybrid approach to simulate the homogenized irreversible elastic-plastic deformations and damage of foams by neural networks10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.003 ↗
3. Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.040 ↗
4. A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under uncertainty: Countering the curse of dimensionality10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.037 ↗
5. Computational homogenization of nonlinear elastic materials using neural networks10.1002/nme.4953 ↗
6. A new neural network-based model for hysteretic behavior of materials10.1002/nme.2082 ↗
7. Implicit constitutive modeling for viscoplasticity using neural networks10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980930)43:2<195::AID-NME418>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
8. Nonlinear constitutive models for FRP composites using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.05.004 ↗
9. Artificial neural networks applied to polymer composites: A review10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00106-4 ↗
10. Modeling the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite materials using artificial neural networks—A review10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.020 ↗
11. Neural network based constitutive model for rubber material10.5254/1.3547822 ↗
12. Application of artificial neural network in prediction of abrasion of rubber composites10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.047 ↗
13. Characterizing rate-dependent material behaviors in self-learning simulation10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.006 ↗
14. Implicit constitutive modelling for viscoplasticity using neural networks10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980930)43:2<195::AID-NME418>3.0.CO;2-6 ↗
15. Prediction of properties of polymer concrete composite with tire rubber using neural networks
16. Prediction of density, porosity and hardness in aluminum–copper-based composite materials using artificial neural network10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.066 ↗
17. A deep energy method for finite deformation hyperelasticity10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103874 ↗
18. Meta-modeling game for deriving theory-consistent, microstructure-based traction-separation laws via deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.026 ↗
19. Exploring the 3D architectures of deep material network in data-driven multiscale mechanics10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.004 ↗
20. Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.039 ↗
21. DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.029 ↗
22. A unified deep artificial neural network approach to partial differential equations in complex geometries10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.056 ↗
23. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of kirchhoff plate10.32604/cmc.2019.06660 ↗
24. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems10.32604/cmc.2019.06641 ↗
25. The deep ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problems10.1007/s40304-018-0127-z ↗
26. Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations10.1109/72.712178 ↗
27. Data-driven computational mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001 ↗
28. Data-driven computing in dynamics10.1002/nme.5716 ↗
29. Model-free data-driven inelasticity10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.016 ↗
30. Data driven computing with noisy material data sets10.1016/j.cma.2017.07.039 ↗
31. Model-free data-driven methods in mechanics: Material data identification and solvers10.1007/s00466-019-01731-1 ↗
32. Parameter identification of a mechanical ductile damage using artificial neural networks in sheet metal forming10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032 ↗
33. Data-based derivation of material response10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.013 ↗
34. Data-driven computation for history-dependent materials10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.008 ↗
35. A computational mechanics special issue on: Data-driven modeling and simulation—Theory, methods, and applications10.1007/s00466-019-01741-z ↗
36. Measuring stress field without constitutive equation10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103087 ↗
37. A data-driven approach to nonlinear elasticity10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.07.031 ↗
38. Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:1(132) ↗
39. A new neural network-based model for hysteretic behavior of materials10.1002/nme.2082 ↗
40. Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis10.1002/nme.905 ↗
41. Improved selfsim for inverse extraction of non-uniform, nonlinear and inelastic constitutive behavior under cyclic loadings10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000114 ↗
42. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models
43. D. P.Kingma and J.Ba, “Adam: a method for stochastic optimization,” 2014. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
44. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
45. M.Abadi, A.Agarwal, P.Barham, E.Brevdo, Z.Chen et al., “Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467.
46. Géron · Book Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems · 2017
47. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on lmageNet classification
48. GPTIPS: An open source genetic programming toolbox for multigene symbolic regression
49. Modeling multi-axial deformation of planar anisotropic elasto-plastic materials, part I: Theory10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.02.002 ↗
50. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals
51. Numerical and experimental investigations of hydro-mechanical deep drawing process of laminated aluminum/steel sheets10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.03.004 ↗
52. Experimentally and numerical study on deep drawing process for magnesium alloy sheet at elevated temperatures10.2320/matertrans.MC200761 ↗