journal article·2023Open access

MF2-DMTD: A Formalism and Game-Based Reasoning Framework for Optimized Drone-Type Moving Target Defense

Sang Seo, Jaeyeon Lee, Byeongjin Kim, Woojin Lee, Dohoon Kim

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 77· Issue 2

Abstract

Moving-target-defense (MTD) fundamentally avoids an illegal initial compromise by asymmetrically increasing the uncertainty as the attack surface of the observable defender changes depending on spatial-temporal mutations. However, the existing naive MTD studies were conducted focusing only on wired network mutations. And these cases have also been no formal research on wireless aircraft domains with attributes that are extremely unfavorable to embedded system operations, such as hostility, mobility, and dependency. Therefore, to solve these conceptual limitations, this study proposes normalized drone-type MTD that maximizes defender superiority by mutating the unique fingerprints of wireless drones and that optimizes the period-based mutation principle to adaptively secure the sustainability of drone operations. In addition, this study also specifies MF2-DMTD (model-checking-based formal framework for drone-type MTD), a formal framework that adopts model-checking and zero-sum game, for attack-defense simulation and performance evaluation of drone-type MTD. Subsequently, by applying the proposed models, the optimization of deceptive defense performance of drone-type MTD for each mutation period also additionally achieves through mixed-integer quadratic constrained programming (MIQCP) and multi-objective optimization-based Pareto frontier. As a result, the optimal mutation cycles in drone-type MTD were derived as (65, 120, 85) for each control-mobility, telecommunication, and payload component configured inside the drone. And the optimal MTD cycles for each swarming cluster, ground control station (GCS), and zone service provider (ZSP) deployed outside the drone were also additionally calculated as (70, 60, 85), respectively. To the best of these authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to calculate the deceptive efficiency and functional continuity of the MTD against drones and to normalize the trade-off according to a sensitivity analysis with the optimum.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: UAV Applications and Optimization · Satellite Communication Systems · Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Bryan · Mosaic Warfare: Exploiting Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems to Implement Decision-Centric Operations · 2020
2. Martyanov · The (Real) Revolution in Military Affairs · 2019
3. army · FM 3-12: Cyberspace Operations and Electromagnetic Warfare · 2021
4. Kemp · Issue Briefs and Reports · 2017 · 1
5. MTD, where Art Thou? A systematic review of moving target defense techniques for IoT10.1109/JIOT.2020.3040358 ↗
6. SD-MTD: Software-defined moving-target defense for cloud-system obfuscation
7. Saputro · Modeling and Design of Secure Internet of Things · 2020 · 1 · 56310.1002/9781119593386.ch24 ↗
8. Toward a secure drone system: Flying with real-time homomorphic authenticated encryption10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819189 ↗
9. Evaluation of LoRaWAN in a highly dense environment with design of common automated metering platform (CAMP) based on LoRaWAN protocol
10. Metrics towards measuring cyber agility10.1109/TIFS.2019.2912551 ↗
11. Bodeau · Cyber Resiliency Metrics, Measures of Effectiveness, and Scoring: Enabling Systems Engineers and Program Managers to Select the Most Useful Assessment Methods · 2018
12. Linkov · Cyber Resilience of Systems and Networks · 2018 · 1 · 1
13. Toward pro-active, adaptive defense: A survey on moving target defense10.1109/COMST.2019.2963791 ↗
14. An attack surface metric10.1109/TSE.2010.60 ↗
15. Moving target defense for Internet of Things based on the zero-determinant theory10.1109/JIOT.2019.2943151 ↗
16. Spatial-temporal moving target defense: A Markov stackelberg game model
17. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018 ↗
18. Reasoning about moving target defense in attack modeling formalisms
19. Incomplete information Markov game theoretic approach to strategy generation for moving target defense10.1016/j.comcom.2017.12.001 ↗
20. S. Sengupta and S. Kambhampati, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning in bayesian stackelberg Markov games for adaptive moving target defense,” arXiv:2007.10457, 2020.
21. Uppaal Stratego, 4.1.20-7, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://uppaal.org/casestudies/stratego/
22. Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cybersecurity Research and Development Program, National Science and Technology Council · 2011
23. Foureye: Defensive deception against advanced persistent threats via Hypergame theory10.1109/TNSM.2021.3117698 ↗
24. Randomized moving target approach for MAC-layer spoofing detection and prevention in IoT systems10.1145/3477403 ↗
25. Performance optimization and analysis on P2P mobile communication systems accelerated by MEC servers
26. Giraldo · Proactive and Dynamic Network Defense. Advances in Information Security · 2019 · 74 · 16310.1007/978-3-030-10597-6_7 ↗
27. Game-theoretic approach to feedback-driven multi-stage moving target defense
28. Toward effectiveness and agility of network security situational awareness using moving target defense (MTD)
29. Software diversity: Security, entropy and game theory
30. Moving target defense against DDoS attacks: An empirical game-theoretic analysis
31. A game theoretic approach to strategy determination for dynamic platform defenses
32. Predictability-oriented defense against adaptive adversaries
33. Protection by detection: A signaling game approach to mitigate co-resident attacks in cloud
34. A signaling game model for moving target defense
35. Deceptive routing games
36. A game theoretic approach to strategy generation for moving target defense in web applications
37. General sum Markov games for strategic detection of advanced persistent threats using moving target defense in cloud networks
38. IoDM: A study on a IoT-based organizational deception modeling with adaptive general-sum game competition10.3390/electronics11101623 ↗
39. Manadhata · Moving Target Defense II · 2013 · 100 · 110.1007/978-1-4614-5416-8_1 ↗
40. Strategy selection for moving target defense in incomplete information game10.32604/cmc.2020.06553 ↗
41. Assessing the effectiveness of moving target defenses using security models10.1109/TDSC.2015.2443790 ↗
42. Dynamic security metrics for measuring the effectiveness of moving target defense techniques10.1016/j.cose.2018.08.003 ↗
43. Cost-effective moving target defense against DDoS attacks using trilateral game and multi-objective Markov decision processes10.1016/j.cose.2020.101976 ↗
44. A formal analysis of moving target defense
45. D-CEWS: DEVS-based cyber-electronic warfare M&S framework for enhanced communication effectiveness analysis in battlefield10.3390/s22093147 ↗
46. Micro air vehicle link (MAVlink) in a nutshell: A survey10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924410 ↗
47. Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey10.1109/COMST.2018.2841996 ↗
48. Internet of drones10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2537208 ↗
49. The theory of dynamic programming10.1090/S0002-9904-1954-09848-8 ↗
50. D3GF: A study on optimal defense performance evaluation of drone-type moving target defense through game theory10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3278744 ↗
51. DOA tracking for seamless connectivity in beamformed IoT-based drones10.1016/j.csi.2021.103564 ↗