A New Cybersecurity Approach Enhanced by xAI-Derived Rules to Improve Network Intrusion Detection and SIEM
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing sophistication of cyberthreats, among others the Distributed Denial of Service attacks, has exposed limitations in traditional rule-based Security Information and Event Management systems. While machine learning–based intrusion detection systems can capture complex network behaviours, their “black-box” nature often limits trust and actionable insight for security operators. This study introduces a novel approach that integrates Explainable Artificial Intelligence—xAI—with the Random Forest classifier to derive human-interpretable rules, thereby enhancing the detection of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. The proposed framework combines traditional static rule formulation with advanced xAI techniques—SHapley Additive exPlanations and Scoped Rules - to extract decision criteria from a fully trained model. The methodology was validated on two benchmark datasets, CICIDS2017 and WUSTL-IIOT-2021. Extracted rules were evaluated against conventional Security Information and Event Management Systems rules with metrics such as precision, recall, accuracy, balanced accuracy, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient. Experimental results demonstrate that xAI-derived rules consistently outperform traditional static rules. Notably, the most refined xAI-generated rule achieved near-perfect performance with significantly improved detection of DDoS traffic while maintaining high accuracy in classifying benign traffic across both datasets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Network Security and Intrusion Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier
2. Doshi-Velez F, Kim B. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv:1702.08608. 2017.
3. Interpretable machine learning-a brief history, state-of-the-art and challenges
4. Choraś M, Pawlicki M, Puchalski D, Kozik R. Machine Learning-the results are not the only thing that matters! What about security, explainability and fairness? In: Computational Science-ICCS 2020: 20th International Conference; 2020 Jun 3–5; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p. 615–28.10.1007/978-3-030-50423-6_46 ↗
5. Choraś · Computer Security. ESORICS, 2023 International Workshops · 167
6. Explainable artificial intelligence for intrusion detection system10.3390/electronics11193079 ↗
7. The past, present, and prospective future of XAI: a comprehensive review
8. Mendes C, Rios TN. Explainable artificial intelligence and cybersecurity: a systematic literature review. arXiv:230301259. 2023.
9. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for intrusion detection and mitigation in intelligent connected vehicles: a review10.3390/app13031252 ↗
10. Security information and event management (SIEM): Analysis, trends, and usage in critical infrastructures10.3390/s21144759 ↗
11. Security Information and Event Management (SIEM).
12. Design and implementation of network security management system based on k-means algorithm
13. Podzins O, Romanovs A. Why SIEM is irreplaceable in a secure IT environment? In: 2019 Open Conference of Electrical, Electronic and Information Sciences (eStream); 2019; Vilnius, Lithuania. p. 1–5. doi:10.1109/eStream.2019.8732173.10.1109/eStream.2019.8732173 ↗
14. Ai/ml for network security: the emperor has no clothes
15. Cyber threat intelligence mining for proactive cybersecurity defense: a survey and new perspectives10.1109/COMST.2023.3273282 ↗
16. Research on constructing a network security event knowledge network based on multi-source data
17. Uccello · Intelligent Information and Database Systems · 2024 · 70
18. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to enhance trust management in intrusion detection systems using decision tree model10.1155/2021/6634811 ↗
19. Explainable prediction of features contributing to intrusion detection using ML algorithms and LIME
20. Explainable AI-based DDOS attack identification method for IoT networks10.3390/computers12020032 ↗
21. Zhou Q, Li R, Xu L, Nallanathan A, Yang J, Fu A. Towards explainable meta-learning for DDoS detection. arXiv:2204.02255. 2022.
22. Das A, Rad P. Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): a survey. arXiv:2006.11371. 2020.
23. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
24. Random decision forests
25. The proposition and evaluation of the roedunet-SIMARGL2021 network intrusion detection dataset10.3390/s21134319 ↗
26. Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization
27. Zolanvari M, Teixeira MA, Gupta L, Khan KM, Jain R. WUSTL-IIOT-2021 dataset for IIoT cybersecurity research [Internet]. MO, USA: St. Louis; [cited 2025 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/∼jain/iiot2/index.html.
28. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
29. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
30. Anchors: high-precision model-agnostic explanations