Optimization Model Proposal for Traffic Differentiation in Wireless Sensor Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are characterized by heterogeneous traffic types (audio, video, data) and diverse application traffic requirements. This paper introduces three traffic classes following the defined model of he... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on Tech Science Press
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. A survey of clustering techniques in WSNs and consideration of the challenges of applying such to 5G IoT scenarios10.1109/JIOT.2017.2726014 ↗
2. Throughput modeling and analysis of random access in narrowband internet of things10.1109/JIOT.2017.2782318 ↗
3. Bandwidth guarantee using class based weighted fair queue (CBWFQ) scheduling algorithm
4. QoS for wireless sensor networks: Enabling service differentiation at the MAC sub-layer using CoSenS10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.06.009 ↗
5. A simple priority-based scheme for delay-sensitive data transmission over wireless sensor networks10.5121/ijwmn.2012.4112 ↗
6. E. Felemban, C. G. Lee, E. Ekici, R. Boder, and S. Vural, “Probabilistic QoS guarantee in reliability and timeliness domains in wireless sensor networks,” presented at the IEEE 24th Annu. Joint Conf. IEEE Comput. Commun. Soc., Miami, FL, USA, Mar. 13–17, 2005, vol. 4, pp. 2646–2657.10.1109/INFCOM.2005.1498548 ↗
7. D. Chen and P. K. Varshney, “QoS support in wireless sensor networks: A survey,” presented at the Int. Conf. Wirel. Netw., Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA, Jun. 21–24, 2004.
8. H. Liu, A. Srinivasan, K. Whitehouse, and J. A. Stankovic, “Mlange: Supporting heterogeneous QoS requirements in delay tolerant sensor networks,” presented at the INSS 2010—Seventh Int. Conf. Netw. Sens. Syst., Kassel, Germany, Jun. 15–18, 2010, pp. 93–96.10.1109/INSS.2010.5573277 ↗
9. MMSPEED: Multipath multi-SPEED protocol for QoS guarantee of reliability and timeliness in wireless sensor networks10.1109/TMC.2006.79 ↗
10. P. McDonald, D. Geraghty, I. Humphreys, S. Farrell, and V. Cahill, “Sensor network with delay tolerance (SeNDT),” presented at the 2007 16th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Netw., Honolulu, HI, USA, Aug. 13–16, 2007, pp. 1333–1338.10.1109/ICCCN.2007.4318006 ↗
11. CarTel: A distributed mobile sensor computing system
12. Vahdat · Handbook of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Technical Report No. CS-2000-06 · 2000
13. Providing a CoAP-based technique to get wireless sensor data via IoT gateway10.1016/j.comcom.2021.03.026 ↗
14. Classification And Regression Tree (CART) based resource allocation scheme for wireless sensor networks10.1016/j.comcom.2022.11.003 ↗
15. Quality-of-service prediction techniques for wireless sensor networks
16. Modelling the integrated QoS for wireless sensor networks with heterogeneous data traffic
17. Enhanced class based dynamic priority scheduling to support uplink IoT traffic in LTE-A networks10.1016/j.jnca.2018.01.010 ↗
18. P. S. Dester, F. C. S. Helder Dos Filho, and P. Cardieri, “Performance analysis of uplink traffic for machine type communication in wireless sensor networks,” presented at the IEEE Conf. Veh. Technol., Porto, Portugal, Jun. 3–6, 2018, pp. 1–5.10.1109/VTCSpring.2018.8417872 ↗
19. A prioritized traffic scheduling with load balancing in wireless body area networks
20. Y. Sun and L. Liu, “Traffic scheduling based on queue model with priority for audio/video sensor networks,” presented at the 2nd Int. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Appl., Birmingham, UK, Jul. 6–27, 2007.10.1109/ICPCA.2007.4365535 ↗
21. Traffic analysis & modeling in wireless sensor networks and their applications on network optimization and anomaly detection
22. Resource allocation and admission control algorithm based on non-cooperation game in wireless mesh networks10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.009 ↗
23. Quality of Service (QoS) performance analysis in a traffic engineering model for next-generation wireless sensor networks10.3390/sym15020513 ↗
24. A modular wireless sensor network gateway design
25. J. Babiarz, K. Chan, and F. Baker, “RFC 4594: Configuration guidelines for DiffServ service classes status,” Aug. 2006. doi: 10.17487/RFC4594.10.17487/rfc4594 ↗
26. Wireless communication technologies for the Internet of Things10.54327/set2021/v1.i1.3 ↗
27. Multi-criteria decision making methods10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00038-7 ↗
28. PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis—Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X ↗
29. Hybrid extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS methodology for evaluating train organization systems in Bosnia and Herzegovina10.54327/set2022/v2.i2.36 ↗
30. Cloud-FuSeR: Fuzzy ontology and MCDM based cloud service selection10.1016/j.future.2015.11.025 ↗
31. An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions10.1002/mcda.1482 ↗
32. Opportunities assessment of product development process in Industry 4.0
33. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts10.3390/encyclopedia3010006 ↗
34. Towards an efficient and a more accurate web service selection using MCDM methods10.1016/j.jocs.2017.05.024 ↗
35. Using wearable technological devices to improve workplace health and safety: An assessment on a sector base with multi-criteria decision-making methods10.1016/j.asej.2023.102423 ↗
36. Time-aware trustworthiness ranking prediction for cloud services using interval neutrosophic set and ELECTRE10.1016/j.knosys.2017.09.027 ↗
37. A heterogeneous QoS-based cloud service selection approach using entropy weight and GRA-ELECTRE III
38. QOS aware vertical handover process in heterogeneous wireless network
39. CCS-OSSR: A framework based on hybrid MCDM for optimal service selection and ranking of cloud computing services10.1007/s10586-020-03166-3 ↗
40. A computational framework for ranking prediction of cloud services under fuzzy environment10.1080/17517575.2021.1889037 ↗
41. A software-defined caching scheme for the Internet of Things10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.002 ↗
42. LiM-AHP-G-C: Life time maximizing based on analytical hierarchal process and genetic clustering protocol for the Internet of Things environment10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107257 ↗
43. QoS-aware selection of IoT-based service10.1007/s13369-020-04601-8 ↗
44. Energy-efficient relay node selection scheme for sustainable wireless body area networks
45. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
46. Comparison in quality of service performance for wireless sensor network routing between fuzzy topsis and SAW algorithm
47. Variable-length multiobjective social class optimization for trust-aware data gathering in wireless sensor networks10.3390/s23125526 ↗
48. J. Kopjak and G. Sebestyen, “Energy consumption model of sensor nodes using merged data collecting methods,” presented at the IEEE 20th Jubilee World Symp. Appl. Mach. Intell. Inf., Poprad, Slovakia, Mar. 2–5, 2022, pp. 27–30.10.1109/SAMI54271.2022.9780791 ↗