Proposed Framework for Detection of Breast Tumors
Source abstract
Abstract
Computer vision is one of the significant trends in computer science. It plays as a vital role in many applications, especially in the medical field. Early detection and segmentation of different tumors is a big challenge in the medical world. The proposed framework uses ultrasound images from Kaggle, applying five diverse models to denoise the images, using the best possible noise-free image as input to the U-Net model for segmentation of the tumor, and then using the Convolution Neural Network (CNN) model to classify whether the tumor is benign, malignant, or normal. The main challenge faced by the framework in the segmentation is the speckle noise. It’s is a multiplicative and negative issue in breast ultrasound imaging, because of this noise, the image resolution and contrast become reduced, which affects the diagnostic value of this imaging modality. As result, speckle noise reduction is very vital for the segmentation process. The framework uses five models such as Generative Adversarial Denoising Network (DGAN-Net), Denoising U-Shaped Net (D-U-NET), Batch Renormalization U-Net (Br-U-NET), Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), and Nonlocal Neutrosophic of Wiener Filtering (NLNWF) for reducing the speckle noise from the breast ultrasound images then choose the best image according to peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) for each level of speckle-noise. The five used methods have been compared with classical filters such as Bilateral, Frost, Kuan, and Lee and they proved their efficiency according to PSNR in different levels of noise. The five diverse models are achieved PSNR results for speckle noise at level (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75), (33.354, 29.415, 27.218, 24.115), (31.424, 28.353, 27.246, 24.244), (32.243, 28.42, 27.744, 24.893), (31.234, 28.212, 26.983, 23.234) and (33.013, 29.491, 28.556, 25.011) for DGAN, Br-U-NET, D-U-NET, GAN and NLNWF respectively. According to the value of PSNR and level of speckle noise, the best image passed for segmentation using U-Net and classification using CNN to detect tumor type. The experiments proved the quality of U-Net and CNN in segmentation and classification respectively, since they achieved 95.11 and 95.13 in segmentation and 95.55 and 95.67 in classification as dice score and accuracy respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques · Image Enhancement Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. A healthy artificial nutrition analysis model during COVID-19 pandemic10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104606 ↗
2. A comprehensive survey on deep learning-based breast cancer diagnosis10.3390/cancers13236116 ↗
3. Feature selection based coral reefs optimization for breast cancer classification
4. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
5. Medical image segmentation in oral-maxillofacial surgery
6. Breast tumor segmentation using U-NET
7. Removal of speckle noises from ultrasound images using five different deep learning networks10.1016/j.jestch.2021.06.010 ↗
8. Neutrosophic set in medical image denoising10.1016/B978-0-12-818148-5.00004-7 ↗
9. Segmentation and denoising of phase contrast MRI image of the aortic lumen via fractal and morphological processing
10. A survey on despeckling filters for speckle noise removal in ultrasound images
11. Speckle noise removal in ultrasound images with stationary wavelet transform and canny operator
12. Speckle noise removal in ultrasound images by first-and second-order total variation10.1007/s11075-017-0386-x ↗
13. An optimized non-local LMMSE approach for speckle noise reduction of medical ultrasound images10.1007/s11042-020-10051-z ↗
14. A model for radar images and its application to adaptive digital filtering of multiplicative noise10.1109/TPAMI.1982.4767223 ↗
15. On the origin of the bilateral filter and ways to improve it10.1109/TIP.2002.801126 ↗
16. Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal dependent noise10.1109/TPAMI.1985.4767641 ↗
17. Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images10.1016/S0146-664X(81)80005-6 ↗
18. P. Liu and R. Fang, “Learning pixel-distribution prior with wider convolution for image denoising,” arXiv Prepr.arXiv1707.09135,vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2017.
19. Denoising prior driven deep neural network for image restoration
20. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
21. A comprehensive survey on convolutional neural network in medical image analysis
22. Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ↗
23. U-Net convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
24. Connected-UNets: A deep learning architecture for breast mass segmentation
25. Dataset of breast ultrasound images10.1016/j.dib.2019.104863 ↗
26. Speckle supression for medical ultrasound images based on modelling speckle with Rayleigh distribution in contourlet domain
27. A new neutrosophic approach to image denoising10.1142/S1793005709001490 ↗
28. Maximum likelihood estimation-based denoising of magnetic resonance images using restricted local neighborhoods10.1088/0031-9155/56/16/009 ↗
29. GAN based noise model for denoising real images
30. DijetGAN: A generative-adversarial network approach for the simulation of QCD dijet events at the LHC10.1007/JHEP08(2019)110 ↗
31. Image denoising using deep CNN with batch renormalization10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.022 ↗
32. Batch renormalization: Towards reducing minibatch dependence in batch-normalized models
33. DN-GAN: Denoising generative adversarial networks for speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101632 ↗
34. A review of deep learning based medical image segmentation methods