Modeling and Verification of Aircraft Takeoff Through Novel Quantum Nets
Source abstract
Abstract
The formal modeling and verification of aircraft takeoff is a challenge because it is a complex safety-critical operation. The task of aircraft takeoff is distributed amongst various computer-based controllers, however, with the growing malicious threats a secure communication between aircraft and controllers becomes highly important. This research serves as a starting point for integration of BB84 quantum protocol with petri nets for secure modeling and verification of takeoff procedure. The integrated model combines the BB84 quantum cryptographic protocol with powerful verification tool support offered by petri nets. To model certain important properties of BB84, a new variant of petri nets coined as Quantum Nets are proposed by defining their mathematical foundations and overall system dynamics, furthermore, some important system properties are also abstractly defined. The proposed Quantum Nets are then applied for modeling of aircraft takeoff process by defining three quantum nets: namely aircraft, runway controller and gate controller. For authentication between quantum nets, the use of external places and transitions is demonstrated to describe the encryption-decryption process of qubits stream. Finally, the developed takeoff quantum network is verified through simulation offered by colored petri-net (CPN) Tools. Moreover, reachability tree (RT) analysis is also performed to have greater confidence in feasibility and correctness of the proposed aircraft takeoff model through the Quantum Nets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Effects in Electronics · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Low-power high-performance VLSI design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Safety control management at airport taxiing to take-off procedure10.1007/s13369-014-1176-6 ↗
2. C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.06557, 2020.
3. An introduction to quantum cryptography10.1145/1144396.1144399 ↗
4. Randomness determines practical security of BB84 quantum key distribution
5. The modeling library of eavesdropping methods in quantum cryptography protocols by model checking10.1007/s10773-016-2969-z ↗
6. S. Zhang, Y. Ma, C. Meng and H. Wang, “Formal verification of quantum communication protocols using petri nets,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1704.07031, 2017.
7. The formal study of quantum cryptography protocols
8. Analysis of quantum cryptography protocols by model checking
9. Classical knowledge for quantum security10.1016/j.entcs.2011.01.014 ↗
10. Model checking for communicating quantum processes
11. T. Davidson, S. J. Gay, R. Nagarajan and I. V. Puthoor, “Analysis of a quantum error correcting code using quantum process calculus,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1210.0614, 2012.10.4204/EPTCS.95.7 ↗
12. Reviewing risks and vulnerabilities in web 2.0 for matching security considerations in web 3.010.1080/09720529.2020.1857903 ↗
13. Communicating quantum processes10.1145/1047659.1040318 ↗
14. A logic for formal verification of quantum programs
15. Semi-automated verification of security proofs of quantum cryptographic protocols10.1016/j.jsc.2015.05.001 ↗
16. Automated verification of equivalence on quantum cryptographic protocols
17. J. Ribeiro and F. Grosshans, “A tight lower bound for the bb84-states quantum-position-verification protocol,” arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1504.07171, 2015.
18. Application of a process calculus to security proofs of quantum protocols
19. Y. Feng and M. Yin, “Toward automatic verification of quantum cryptographic protocols,” arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1507.05278, 2015.
20. A formal approach to unconditional security proofs for quantum key distribution
21. Security oriented analysis of B92 by model checking
22. Model checking quantum key distribution protocols
23. S. Kuppam, “Modelling and analysis of quantum key distribution protocols, BB84 and B92, in communicating quantum processes (CQP) language and analysing in PRISM,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1612.03706, 2016.
24. Integration of a quantum protocol for mutual authentication and secret key distribution within 802.11i standard
25. Quantum bit commitment on IBM QX10.1007/s11128-019-2543-8 ↗
26. Coding in the entanglement domain10.1007/s11128-020-02632-6 ↗
27. Quantum cryptography: A comprehensive survey
28. Quantum cryptography trends: a milestone in information security
29. Verification of quantum cryptography protocols by model checking10.5121/ijnsa.2010.2404 ↗
30. S. Gay, R. Nagarajan and N. Papanikolaou, “Probabilistic model-checking of quantum protocols,” arXiv preprint, quant-ph/0504007, 2005.
31. Equivalence checking of quantum protocols
32. Verification of concurrent quantum protocols by equivalence checking
33. M. Elboukhari, M. Azizi and A. Azizi, “Analysis of the security of BB84 by model checking,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1005.4504, 2010.10.5121/ijnsa.2010.2207 ↗
34. Simulation and analysis of BB84 protocol by model checking
35. R. Nagarajan, N. Papanikolaou, G. Bowen and S. J. Gay, “An automated analysis of the security of quantum key distribution,” arXiv preprint, cs/0502048, 2005.
36. Formal verification of the security of a free-space quantum key distribution system
37. Analysis of security of quantum key distribution based on entangled photon pairs by model checking10.4236/jqis.2015.53012 ↗
38. Information security in business: A bibliometric analysis of the 100 top cited articles
39. Evolutionary-based image encryption using RNA codons truth table10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.105818 ↗
40. Robust and fragile watermarking for medical images using redundant residue number system and chaos10.14311/NNW.2020.30.013 ↗
41. Optimum information embedding in digital watermarking10.3233/JIFS-162405 ↗
42. Reversible and fragile watermarking for medical images10.1155/2018/3461382 ↗
43. Robust and fragile watermarking for medical images: A joint venture of coding and chaos theories10.1155/2018/8137436 ↗
44. Medical image watermarking for fragility and robustness: A chaos, ECC and RRNS based approach10.1166/jmihi.2018.2431 ↗
45. Performance comparison of product codes and cubic product codes using FRBS for robust watermarking
46. Compressed sensing for security and payload enhancement in digital audio steganography
47. High-capacity image steganography based on prime series representation and payload redundancy removal
48. Improved and secure differential LSB embedding steganography
49. Formal specification and analysis of take-off procedure using VDM-SL10.1186/s40294-016-0014-y ↗
50. Formalizing the resurrecting duckling into hierarchical coloured petri nets