journal article·2022Open access

Optimization Model for Selecting Temporary Hospital Locations During COVID-19 Pandemic

Chia-Nan Wang, Chien-Chang Chou, Hsien-Pin Hsu, Van Thanh Nguyen, Viet Tinh Nguyen

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 70· Issue 1

Abstract

The two main approaches that countries are using to ease the strain on healthcare infrastructure is building temporary hospitals that are specialized in treating COVID-19 patients and promoting preventive measures. As such, the selection of the optimal location for a temporary hospital and the calculation of the prioritization of preventive measures are two of the most critical decisions during the pandemic, especially in densely populated areas where the risk of transmission of the virus is highest. If the location selection process or the prioritization of measures is poor, healthcare workers and patients can be harmed, and unnecessary costs may come into play. In this study, a decision support framework using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and a weighted aggregated sum product assessment model are proposed for selecting the location of a temporary hospital, and a FAHP model is proposed for calculating the prioritization of preventive measures against COVID-19. A case study is performed for Ho Chi Minh City using the proposed decision-making framework. The contribution of this work is to propose a multiple criteria decision-making model in a fuzzy environment for ranking potential locations for building temporary hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of the study can be used to assist decision-makers, such as government authorities and infectious disease experts, in dealing with the current pandemic as well as other diseases in the future. With the entire world facing the global pandemic of COVID-19, many scientists have applied research achievements in practice to help decision-makers make accurate decisions to prevent the pandemic. As the number of cases increases exponentially, it is crucial that government authorities and infectious disease experts make optimal decisions while considering multiple quantitative and qualitative criteria. As such, the proposed approach can also be applied to support complex decision-making processes in a fuzzy environment in different countries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Facility Location and Emergency Management · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Pandemics and the consequences of COVID-1910.1111/ecaf.12415 ↗
2. John Hopkins University. (2020, April 1st). “COVID-19 global map,” [Online]. Available: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html.
3. COVID-19 breakthroughs: Separating fact from fiction10.1111/febs.15442 ↗
4. World Health Organization. (2020, January 30th). “WHO Director-general's statement on IHR emergency committee on novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV),” [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/dg/speech-es/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov).
5. World health organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.036 ↗
6. COVID-19: A decision-making approach for prioritization of preventive activities10.1080/20479700.2020.1782661 ↗
7. An evaluation model of quantitative and qualitative fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for hydroelectric plant location selection10.3390/en13112783 ↗
8. A hybrid fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution supplier evaluation and selection in the food processing industry10.3390/sym12020211 ↗
9. Multi-criteria decision model for the selection of suppliers in the textile industry10.3390/sym12060979 ↗
10. Zrx MCDM: A fully flexible tool to support the local adaptation of multiple-criteria decision criteria in health care10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2634 ↗
11. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.004 ↗
12. Integrated short-term and long-term MCDM model for solving location selection problems10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000057 ↗
13. Tourist hotel location ion with analytic hierarchy process10.15637/jlecon.82 ↗
14. Location selection of electric vehicles charging stations by using a fuzzy MCDM method: A case study in Turkey10.1007/s00521-018-3752-2 ↗
15. Third-party reverse logistics provider selection approach based on hybrid-information MCDM and cumulative prospect theory10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.213 ↗
16. An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.12.011 ↗
17. Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095 ↗
18. Evaluation of an automatic dry eye test using MCDM methods and rank correlation10.1007/s11517-016-1534-5 ↗
19. An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier evaluation and selection10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.019 ↗
20. An interval type 2 hesitant fuzzy MCDM approach and a fuzzy c-means clustering for retailer clustering10.1007/s00500-018-3191-0 ↗
21. Selecting distribution centre location using an improved fuzzy MCDM approach10.1007/s00170-003-1896-3 ↗
22. Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.041 ↗
23. A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.033 ↗
24. GIS-Based onshore wind farm site selection using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods: Evaluating the case of southeastern Spain10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.030 ↗
25. Evaluation of service quality by using fuzzy MCDM: A case study in Iranian health-care centers10.5267/j.msl.2011.08.009 ↗
26. A hybrid MCDM model for improving the electronic health record to better serve client needs10.3390/su9101819 ↗
27. Evaluation of influenza intervention strategies in Turkey with fuzzy AHP-VIKOR10.1155/2019/9486070 ↗
28. A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106613 ↗
29. Evaluating and prioritizing hospital service quality10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2018-0082 ↗
30. Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF)10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.031 ↗
31. Sustainable assessment of alternative sites for the construction of a waste incineration plant by applying WASPAS method with single-valued neutrosophic net10.3390/su71215792 ↗
32. WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.034 ↗
33. Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031 ↗
34. An uncertainty-aware integrated fuzzy AHP-WASPAS model to evaluate public cloud computing services10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.068 ↗
35. Extent analysis and synthetic decision
36. An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: A decision-making paradox10.1016/0167-9236(89)90037-7 ↗
37. Application of a gray-based decision support framework for location selection of a temporary hospital during COVID-19 pandemic10.3390/sym12060886 ↗
38. Thanhnien News. (2020, April 9th). “Lên phu'o'ng án xây bỄnh viỄn dã chiển cho tình huễng khần cỆp chễng dẨch Covid-19,” [Online]. Available: https://thanhnien.vn/thoi-su/len-phuong-an-xay-benh-vien-da-chien-cho-tinh-huong-khan-cap-chong-dich-covid-19-1208652.html.
39. Vietnamnet. (2019, October 11th). “TP.HCM ︍ông dân nhỆt cá nu'ó'c, có quẩn gỆp ︍ôi dân sễ 1 tính,” [Online]. Available: https://vietnamnet.vn/vn/thoi-su/tp-hcm-dong-dan-nhat-ca-nuoc-co-quan-gap-doi-dan-so-1-tinh-576197.html.
40. Ho Chi Minh City Department of Health. (2019, December 21st). “Kểt quà ︍ánh giá chỆt lu'Ẳ'ng bỄnh viỄn thuẳc Ngành Y tể TP.HCM năm 2019,” [Online]. Available: http://medinet.gov.vn/giam-doc-cac-benh-vien-can-biet/ket-qua-danh-gia-chat-luong-benh-vien-thuoc-nganh-y-te-tphcm-nam-2019-so-y-te-h-c13465-22365.aspx.
41. Ho Chi Minh City Department of Health. (2020, August 12th). “Hu'ó'ng dằn thiểt kể bỄnh viỄn dã chiển,” [Online]. Available: http://www.medinet.hochiminhcity.gov.vn/chuyen-muc/huong-dan-thiet-ke-benh-vien-da-chien-chuyen-dieu-tri-covid-19-cmobile8-26506.aspx.
42. OrangeSmile Tour B. V. (2020, August 15th). “Detailed hi-res maps of Ho Chi minh city for download or print,” [Online]. Available: https://www.orangesmile.com/travelguide/ho-chi-minh-city/high-resolution-maps.htm.