journal article·2022Open access

Fuzzy MCDM Model for Selection of Infectious Waste Management Contractors

Nguyen Van Thanh, Nguyen Hoang Hai, Nguyen Thi Kim Lan

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 72· Issue 2

Abstract

Healthcare supply chains are under pressure to drive down costs because of digital business, shifting customer needs and new competition. Medical waste generated from medical facilities includes medical activities and daily-life activities of patients and their family members. According to statistics of the Department of Health Environmental Management, Vietnam currently has more than 13,500 medical facilities, including hospitals from central to provincial and district levels and private hospitals and medical facilities. Preventive medicine generates about 590 tons of medical waste/day and is estimated to be about 800 tons/day. Medical waste includes ordinary medical waste and hazardous medical waste; in which ordinary medical waste accounts for about 80%–90%, only about 10%–20% is hazardous medical waste including infectious waste and non-infectious hazardous waste. This is an environmental and occupational health issue that needs attention in developing countries like Vietnam. Handling large amounts of medical waste to ensure environmental and personal hygiene, doing so inefficiently creates potential hazards to the environment and increases operating costs. However, hospitals lack objective criteria and methods to evaluate and select the most optimal infectious medical waste, relying instead on their own subjective assessment and prior experience. Therefore, the author proposed a fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM) model including Fuzzy Analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the Weighted Aggregated Sum-Product Assessment (WASPAS) for infectious medical waste contractors’ selection in this research. The proposed Fuzzy MCDM method is in-tended to provide a more efficient, accurate method in the selection of infectious medical waste contractors than subjective assessment methods, thus reduce potential risks to hospitals. The results of this study can be applied to evaluate and select contractors in other industries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Multi-Criteria Decision Making

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. MedPro Disposal. (2020, August 18th). “Medical waste disposal and management services,” [Online]. Available: https://www.medprodisposal.com/medical-waste-disposal/.
2. Tan Phu Hospital. (2020, June 19th). “Công tác phân loại chất thải y tế tại nguồn tại các cơ sở khám bệnh, chữa bệnh,” [Online]. Available: https://www.medprodisposal.com/medical-waste-disposal/.
3. C. Hoang. (2020, June 29th). “Công tác phân loại chất thải y tế tại nguồn tại các cơ sở khám bệnh, chữa bệnh,” [Online]. Available: http://benhvientanphu.vn/quan-ly-chat-luong/cong-tac-phan-loai-chat-thai-y-te-tai-nguon--tai-cac-co-so-kham-benh-chua-benh-4208.html.
4. Thực trạng xử lý chất thải rắn y tế lây nhiễm bằng phương pháp thiêu đốt tại các bệnh viện
5. N. T. Lan, N. M. Chau and N. X. Thao, “Phân tích so sánh một số mô hinh MCDM và ứng dụng trong hệ thông tin ra quyết định,” Tạp chí khoa học nông nghiệp Việt Nam, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 462–472, 2021.10.54607/hcmue.js.19.3.3395(2022) ↗
6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.019 ↗
7. Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: A case study in senirkent-uluborlu (Isparta) basin, Turkey10.1007/s10661-010-1403-x ↗
8. The selection of the logistics distribution center location based on MCDM methodology in southern and eastern region in Serbia
9. Landfill siting evaluation using gis and multi-criteria decision-making method: A case study: Dammam municipal solid waste landfill10.4236/jgis.2021.134028 ↗
10. Comparative study of analytical hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) methods in site selection of urban waste landfill (case study: Ramhormoz city)
11. Combining GIS, fuzzy logic, and AHP models for solid waste disposal site selection in nasiriyah, Iraq
12. Site selection of construction waste recycling plant10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.252 ↗
13. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues10.3390/ijerph16061060 ↗
14. Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.031 ↗
15. Landfill site selection for municipal solid wastes in mountainous areas with landslide susceptibility10.1007/s11356-016-6459-x ↗
16. A review of energy recovery from waste in China10.1177/0734242X11433530 ↗
17. Combining stakeholder analysis and spatial multicriteria evaluation to select and rank inert landfill sites10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.039 ↗
18. Multi-criteria healthcare waste disposal location selection based on fermatean fuzzy WASPAS method10.1007/s40747-021-00407-9 ↗
19. Developing a master plan for hospital solid waste management: A case study10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.018 ↗
20. Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods
21. Suggested guidelines for emergency treatment of medical waste during COVID-19: Chinese experience10.1007/s42768-020-00039-8 ↗
22. Infectious waste management strategy during COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: An integrated decision-making framework for selecting sustainable technologies10.1007/s00267-020-01375-5 ↗
23. Application of multi-criteria-decision approach for the analysis of medical waste management systems in Myanmar10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.049 ↗
24. Comparison of health-care waste management in urban and rural areas in Iran: Application of multi-criteria decision making method10.5812/jhealthscope.113282 ↗
25. Improper solid waste management increases potential for COVID-19 spread in developing countries10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104947 ↗
26. Face mask and medical waste disposal during the novel COVID-19 pandemic in Asia10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100052 ↗
27. A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection10.15837/ijccc.2015.6.2078 ↗
28. Site selection for hazardous waste using fuzzy logic combined with analytic hierarchy process: A case study in nahavand, Iran10.34172/ajehe.2019.02 ↗
29. Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.013 ↗
30. Hazardous waste generation and management in China: A review10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.106 ↗
31. Using metaheuristic algorithms to solve a multi-objective industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem considering incompatible waste types10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.029 ↗
32. An intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach for effective hazardous waste management
33. Assessment of hazardous waste management proposal: Using the analytic hierarchy process
34. Multiple criteria decision analysis using DEA-TOPSIS method for hazardous waste management: A case study of the USA10.5121/ijmit.2015.7301 ↗
35. Hazardous waste landfill siting using GIS technique and analytical hierarchy process
36. Sustainable assessment of alternative sites for the construction of a waste incineration plant by applying WASPAS method with single-valued neutrosophic Set10.3390/su71215792 ↗
37. Hazardous waste transportation firm selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy and PROMETHEE methods10.1504/IJSTL.2015.067847 ↗
38. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 ↗
39. Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS—A case study of Indian cement industry10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0041 ↗
40. An extension of best-worst method with D numbers: Application in evaluation of renewable energy resources10.1016/j.seta.2020.100771 ↗
41. “Health environment management agency,” (2017, May 27th). “Chất thải y tế là gì, định nghĩa, phân loại, ví dụ và hơn thế nữa,” [Online]. Available: https://vihema.gov.vn/chat-thai-y-te-la-gi-dinh-nghia-phan-loai-vi-du-va-hon-the-nua.html.