journal article·2023Open access

Smart Contract to Traceability of Food Social Selling

Cristian Valencia-Payan, Jos�Fernando Grass-Ram韗ez, Gustavo Ramirez-Gonzalez, Juan Carlos Corrales

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 74· Issue 3

Abstract

Traditionally, food sustainability has been considered solely in the stage of agricultural production. However, globalization, the expansion of the food production industry, and the emergence of supermarket chains that control the retail food market require specific significant changes in supply chains in the food sector and, therefore, we need to address the economic, social, and environmental impacts of these events. On the other hand, social selling has increased rapidly in recent years, with a further boom, following current events related to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). This explosion of social sales, where there are usually no control and regulation entities, can bring problems associated with mishandling items. In this paper, we expose how Blockchain technology supports the traceability of social sales by validating the data provided by the chain participants such as digital health passports, production and transport data in the sale process; the proposed solution generates recommendations on product management considering the agreements previously made by the network actors. To evaluate the proposed smart contracts, we use Hyperledger Caliper, obtaining an average throughput of 12.6 transactions per second and an average latency of 0.3 s for the asset update process. We also use a study case to evaluate the proposed project platform’s selling-transport stage using Internet of Things (IoT) sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Food Supply Chain Traceability · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 ↗
2. Social selling: A comparison of social media usage across process stage, markets, and sales job functions10.1080/10696679.2015.980163 ↗
3. An RFID application in the food supply chain: A case study of convenience stores in Taiwan10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.04.014 ↗
4. The evaluation of a healthcare passport to improve quality of care and communication for people living with dementia (Equip): A protocol paper for a qualitative, longitudinal study10.1186/s12913-016-1617-x ↗
5. The new sales funnel for the smes and freelancers in the 4.0 revolution
6. Advancing social media driven sales research: Establishing conceptual foundations for B-to-B social selling10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.002 ↗
7. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey10.1504/IJWGS.2018.095647 ↗
8. United Nations, “A guide to traceability: A practical approach to advance sustainability in global supply chains about the united nations global compact,” 2014. [Online]. Available: www.bsr.org.
9. Security issues in wireless sensor network-a review
10. Data secure storage mechanism of sensor networks based on blockchain10.32604/cmc.2020.011567 ↗
11. Auditing the blockchain oracle problem10.2308/ISYS-19-049 ↗
12. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering
13. M. Alharby and A. van Moorsel, “Blockchain based smart contracts: A systematic mapping study,” in 11th Int. Conf. in Computer Science and Information Technologies, Yerevan, Armenia, pp. 125–140, 2017.10.5121/csit.2017.71011 ↗
14. U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Assessing data reliability applied research and methods,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/703275.pdf.
15. O’Connor · Practical Reliability Engineering · 2012 · 1
16. How might broad adoption of blockchain-based traceability impact the U.S. fresh produce supply chain?10.1002/aepp.13134 ↗
17. Blockchain based data storage mechanism in cyber physical system
18. Blockchain-based systems and applications: A survey
19. Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121403 ↗
20. Rambhia · Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) · 2022 · 12991 · 3
21. Agri-food safety optimized by blockchain technology: Review10.15446/rfnam.v75n1.95760 ↗
22. Design and implementation of a food safety traceability platform based on blockchain and Internet of Things
23. A blockchain-based incremental update supported data storage system for intelligent vehicles10.1109/TVT.2021.3068990 ↗
24. Xu · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · 2021 · 12910.1007/978-3-030-65691-1_9 ↗
25. A storage optimization scheme for blockchain transaction databases10.32604/csse.2021.014530 ↗
26. An optimized transaction verification method for trustworthy blockchain-enabled IIoT10.1016/j.adhoc.2021.102526 ↗
27. Blockchain-IoT sensor (BIoTs): A solution to IoT-ecosystems security issues10.3390/s21134388 ↗
28. Enhanced audit strategies for collaborative and accountable data sharing in social networks10.1145/3134439 ↗
29. Guidi · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · 2020 · 62 · 10110.1016/j.pmcj.2020.101131 ↗
30. Diffusion of cryptocurrencies: Web traffic and social network attributes as indicators of cryptocurrency performance10.1007/s11135-019-00840-6 ↗
31. Food supply chain safety research trends from 1997 to 2020: A bibliometric analysis10.3389/fpubh.2021.742980 ↗
32. Metaheuristic-based deep COVID-19 screening model from chest X-Ray images10.1155/2021/8829829 ↗
33. Automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 Related pneumonia from CXR and CT-Scan images10.48084/etasr.4613 ↗
34. Blockchain-based traceability system that ensures food safety measures to protect consumer safety and COVID-19 free supply chains10.3390/foods10061289 ↗
35. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.11.007 ↗
36. On the benefits and challenges of blockchains for managing food supply chains10.1002/jsfa.10883 ↗
37. Social media and supply chain
38. United Nations, “COVID-19 and e-commerce impact on businesses and policy responses,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2020d12_en.pdf.
39. Passport to health: An innovative tool to enhance healthy lifestyle choices10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.04.006 ↗
40. Minsalud, “Mi vacuna,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://mivacuna.sispro.gov.co/mivacuna.
41. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trade and development
42. Modeling and analyzing MAPE-K feedback loops for self-adaptation
43. Connecting-Food, “The world’s first food confidence platform, blockchain-based,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://connecting-food.com/.
44. Authena, “Authena-product authentication & brand traceability,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://authena.io/.
45. Ebay, “EBay Inc,” 2001. [Online]. Available: https://www.ebayinc.com/.
46. Amazon, “About Amazon,” 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.aboutamazon.com/.
47. Meta, “Social metaverse company,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://about.facebook.com/.
48. DoorDash, “About us,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.doordash.com/en-US/about/.
49. Agrichain, “About the platform,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://agrichain.com/about-the-platform/.
50. DownStream, “About downstream,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.down-stream.io/about.
51. AgriDigital, “Our story,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.agridigital.io/about-us.
52. Fishcoin, “Fishcoin: Blckchain based seafood traceability & data ecosystem,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://fishcoin.co/.
53. A. Maca and L. Navia, “Estrategias para el rescate y valorización de los dulces tradicionales de popayán,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://repositorio.unicauca.edu.co:8080/handle/123456789/1581.
54. Toward more rigorous blockchain research: Recommendations for writing blockchain case studies10.3389/fbloc.2019.00003 ↗
55. RAFT, “Raft consensus algorithm,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://raft.github.io/.
56. Elitegroup, “ECS tag,” 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecs.com.tw/en/product/iot/cscg_tag/overview.
57. Assessing data reliability in an information system10.1080/07421222.1987.11517792 ↗