Rasch Model Assessment for Bloom Digital Taxonomy Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Assessment using Bloom’s taxonomy levels has evolved in a variety of contexts and uses. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, which necessitates use of online assessment, the need for teachers to use digital-based taxonomy skills or Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy (BDT) has increased even more. However, the existing studies on validity and reliability of BDT items are limited. To overcome this limitation, this study aims to test whether BDT has good psychometric characteristics as a teacher’s self-assessment tool using the Rasch model analysis and to investigate the pattern of BDT usage in teaching and learning. By using a quantitative online survey design, this study involves six levels of BDT, namely, Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. The questionnaire was developed and validated by two experts prior to administration. A stratified random sampling technique was conducted on 774 secondary teachers from five geographical zones in Malaysia, and the Rasch model was analyzed using WINSTEPS 3.71 software. The performances of items improved by Rasch psychometric assessment including the application of BDT among teachers. The hierarchy level was also assessed through graphical analysis, including the Wright map and bubble chart, to demonstrate the powerful performance of the Rasch model analysis in investigating item quality and reliability. Overall, these empirically validated items using the Rasch model could advance the academic knowledge of BDT for future assessment and promote the Rasch calibration in an educational setting.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Educational Technology and Assessment · Online Learning and Analytics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Applying Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy ideas in adult learning10.15503/jecs2020.1.61.72 ↗
2. A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 ↗
3. Bloom’s taxonomy: Improving assessment and teaching-learning process10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1034 ↗
4. A. Churches, “Bloom’s digital taxonomy,” pp. 1–44, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://burtonslifelearning.pbworks.com/f/BloomDigitalTaxonomy2001.pdf.
5. Improving the ability of implementing fun-based learning through structured clinical supervision on Mathematics teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Barru Indonesia10.35877/454RI.asci163 ↗
6. The professional competence analysis of chemistry teacher of senior high school in Merauke10.35877/454RI.asci103 ↗
7. Comparative study of knowledge and use of Bloom’s digital taxonomy by teachers and students in virtual and conventional universities10.1108/AAOUJ-01-2020-0005 ↗
8. Introducing educational technologies to teachers: Experience report introducing educational technologies to teachers: Experience report
9. Creation of electronic learning objects for the high cognitive levels of Bloom’s digital taxonomy10.35120/kij3102585g ↗
10. Using the revised Bloom taxonomy to analyze psychotherapeutic games10.1155/2018/8784750 ↗
11. The technology driven student: How to apply Bloom’s revised taxonomy to the digital generations
12. SAMR model and bloom’s digital taxonomy applied in blended learning/teaching of general english and ESP
13. Reevaluating bloom’s taxonomy: What measurable verbs can and cannot say about student learning10.3390/educsci6040037 ↗
14. A critical appraisal of Bloom’s taxonomy
15. Pilot study: Bloom’s digital taxonomy application for an online art project10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2016.0300 ↗
16. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010 ↗
17. Bloom-ing heck! the activities of Australian science teachers and students two years into a 1:1 laptop program across 14 high schools
18. Bloom’s taxonomy analysis in vocational assessment: The development of a new Taxonomy using the Delphi Technique
19. Bloom’s taxonomy position from an Islamic perspective10.33102/jqss.vol2no1.8 ↗
20. A critical analysis of Bloom’s Taxonomy in teaching creative and critical thinking skills in Malaysia through english literature10.5539/elt.v10n9p245 ↗
21. Exploring 21st century children’s skills in the process of digital storytelling game design
22. Hair · Essentials of Marketing Research · 2020
23. Sekaran · Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach · 2016
24. Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal10.5688/aj720243 ↗
25. A quantitative approach to content validity10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x ↗
26. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research10.1093/swr/27.2.94 ↗
27. A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review10.1007/s11135-017-0533-4 ↗
28. Aziz · Rasch Model Fundamentals: Scale Construct and Measurement Structure · 2011
29. Bond · Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences · 201510.4324/9781315814698 ↗
30. What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean
31. Rating scale instrument quality criteria
32. Wu · Applying the Rasch Model to Psycho-Social Measurement: A Practical Approach · 2007
33. Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results and implications10.3102/10769986004003207 ↗
34. Linacre · A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs · 2005
35. Aziz · Rasch Measurement Model Basis: Scale Development and Measurement Structure · 2017
36. Linacre · A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch Model Computer Programs · 2012
37. Malaysia Ministry of Education, “Malaysia Education Development Plan 2013–2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education),” Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/penerbitan-dan-jurnal/1818-pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025/file.
38. Wright · Rating Scale Analysis Rasch Measurement · 1982