Single-screw extrusion performance for LLDPE resin as a function of compression ratio
Source abstract
Abstract
High-quality polyethylene film and sheet must be free of solid polymer fragments and degraded resin. Moreover, the products must be produced at high rates to minimize conversion costs. Thus, the extruder must produce a homogenous extrudate at the proper discharge temperature and pressure. The screw design and process operating parameters are key. A key screw design parameter is the compression ratio. This paper experimentally studies how the compression ratio affects a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) resin extrusion process. A 2.8 compression ratio screw was optimal for LLDPE resin. Significant solid polymer fragments were observed in the extrudate for 2.8 to 3.6 compression ratio screws at 110 rpm and higher. For 2.0 and 2.4 compression ratio screws at less than 50 rpm, the internal pressures in the extruder were relatively low. At screw speeds 50 rpm and higher, the specific rates for all screws were higher than the calculated specific rotational rate, creating negative axial pressure gradients in the metering sections.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dow, Inc., Lake Jackson, TX, USA
Dow, Inc., Midland, MI, USA
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-1-56990-785-610.1007/978-1-56990-785-6 ↗
2. Campbell GA · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2013 · 59 · 1087
3. Chung CI · 2011
4. Giles J, HF · 2005
5. Powers JD · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1994 · 40 · 151
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199621)15:1<29::AID-ADV3>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199621)15:1<29::AID-ADV3>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.76018090610.1002/pen.760180906 ↗
8. Hogan TA · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2002 · 48 · 384
9. Frankland J · Plastics Technology Magazine · 2022 · 28 · 10
10. Spalding MA · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2011 · 57 · 1211
11. Zoller P · 1995
12. Campbell GA · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2009 · 55 · 147
13. McCullough TW · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1996 · 42 · 412
14. Tadmor Z · 1970
15. Hogan TA · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2002 · 48 · 384
16. Altinkaynak A · SPE-ANTEC Tech. Papers · 2008 · 54 · 1405
17. 10.1177/8756087922112417210.1177/87560879221124172 ↗