COVID-9 and Unemployment: A Novel Bi-level Optimal Control Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Since COVID-19 was declared as a pandemic in March 2020, the world’s major preoccupation has been to curb it while preserving the economy and reducing unemployment. This paper uses a novel Bi-Level Dynamic Optimal Control model (BLDOC) to coordinate control between COVID-19 and unemployment. The COVID-19 model is the upper level while the unemployment model is the lower level of the bi-level dynamic optimal control model. The BLDOC model’s main objectives are to minimize the number of individuals infected with COVID-19 and to minimize the unemployed individuals, and at the same time minimizing the cost of the containment strategies. We use the modified approximation Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions with the Hamiltonian function to handle the bi-level dynamic optimal control model. We consider three control variables: The first control variable relates to government measures to curb the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., quarantine, social distancing, and personal protection; and the other two control variables relate to government interventions to reduce the unemployment rate, i.e., employment, making individuals qualified, creating new jobs reviving the economy, reducing taxes. We investigate four different cases to verify the effect of control variables. Our results indicate that rather than focusing exclusively on only one problem, we need a balanced trade-off between controlling each.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: COVID-19 epidemiological studies · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. COVID-19: How much unemployment was caused by the shutdown in Germany?
2. Poverty and COVID-19: A report of the social metrics commission
3. Sumner · UNU–WIDER · 2020
4. Optimal control analysis of a mathematical model for unemployment10.1002/oca.2195 ↗
5. A mathematical approach to employment policies: An optimal control analysis
6. Threshold parameter for the control of unemployment in the society: Mathematical model and analysis10.4236/jamp.2018.612214 ↗
7. Unemployment model10.12988/ams.2018.87102 ↗
8. A simple mathematical model for unemployment: A case study in Portugal with optimal controly10.19139/soic.v6i1.470 ↗
9. A dynamic model of unemployment with migration and delayed policy intervention10.1007/s10614-016-9610-3 ↗
10. Modeling the role of skill development to control unemployment
11. Prediction of the epidemic peak of coronavirus disease in Japan10.3390/jcm9030789 ↗
12. Early dynamics of transmission and control of 2019-nCoV: A mathematical modelling study10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30144-4 ↗
13. A model based study on the dynamics of COVID-19: Prediction and control10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109889 ↗
14. Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: A review10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110059 ↗
15. Mathematical modeling of COVID-19 transmission dynamics with a case study of Wuhan10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109846 ↗
16. Mathematical modelling of COVID-19 transmission and mitigation strategies in the population of Ontario, Canada10.1503/cmaj.200476 ↗
17. A Predator–prey model of unemployment and w-shaped recession in the COVID-19 pandemic
18. A Review on bilevel optimization: From classical to evolutionary approaches and applications10.1109/TEVC.2017.2712906 ↗
19. K. Palagachev, “Mixed-integer optimal control and bilevel optimization: Vanishing constraints and scheduling tasks,” Ph.D. dissertation, Bundeswehr University Munich, Germany, 2017.
20. Necessary conditions for bilevel dynamic optimization problems10.1137/S0363012993249717 ↗
21. Palagachev · Math for the Digital Factory · 2017 · 27 · 20510.1007/978-3-319-63957-4_10 ↗
22. Bilevel optimal control with final-state-dependent finite-dimensional lower level10.1137/15M1015984 ↗
23. Bilevel optimal control problems with pure state constraints and finite-dimensional lower level10.1137/141000889 ↗
24. Palagachev · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · 2015 · 410
25. Gradient-based solution algorithms for a class of bilevel optimization and optimal control problems with a non-smooth lower level10.1137/18M1225707 ↗
26. Fast and save container cranes as bilevel optimal control problems10.1080/13873954.2011.642388 ↗
27. Handling inverse optimal control problems using evolutionary bilevel optimization
28. A new evolutionary algorithm for a class of nonlinear bilevel programming problems and its global convergence10.1287/ijoc.1100.0430 ↗
29. Evolutionary algorithm for bilevel optimization using approximations of the lower level optimal solution mapping10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.027 ↗
30. An improved bilevel evolutionary algorithm based on quadratic approximations10.1109/CEC.2014.6900391 ↗
31. A bilevel optimal motion planning model with application to autonomous parking10.1007/s41315-019-00109-z ↗
32. Mathematical programs with complementarity constraints in the context of inverse optimal control for locomotion10.1080/10556788.2016.1225212 ↗
33. Hybrid approach for constrained optimal control of nonlinear switched systems10.1007/s40313-020-00586-9 ↗
34. Using Karush–Kuhn–Tucker proximity measure for solving bilevel optimization problems10.1016/j.swevo.2018.06.004 ↗
35. Worldometers, “Yemen population,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/worldpopulation/yemen-population/.
36. Macrotrends, “Macrotrends,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.macrotrends.net/1316/us-nationalunemployment-rate?q=yemen.
37. Mathematical approach with optimal control: Reduction of unemployment problem in Bangladesh10.5890/JAND.2020.06.006 ↗