Hesitant Fuzzy-Sets Based Decision-Making Model for Security Risk Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
Security is an important component in the process of developing healthcare web applications. We need to ensure security maintenance; therefore the analysis of healthcare web application's security risk is of utmost importance. Properties must be considered to minimise the security risk. Additionally, security risk management activities are revised, prepared, implemented, tracked, and regularly set up efficiently to design the security of healthcare web applications. Managing the security risk of a healthcare web application must be considered as the key component. Security is, in specific, seen as an add-on during the development process of healthcare web applications, but not as the key problem. Researchers must ensure that security is taken into account right from the earlier developmental stages of the healthcare web application. In this row, the authors of this study have used the hesitant fuzzy-based AHP-TOPSIS technique to estimate the risks of various healthcare web applications for improving security-durability. This approach would help to design and incorporate security features in healthcare web applications that would be able to battle threats on their own, and not depend solely on the external security of healthcare web applications. Furthermore, in terms of healthcare web application's security-durability, the security risk variable is measured, and vice versa. Hence, the findings of our study will also be useful in improving the durability of several web applications in healthcare.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Data Quality and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluating performance of software durability through an integrated fuzzy-based symmetrical method of ANP and TOPSIS10.3390/sym12040493 ↗
2. Security durability assessment through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process10.7717/peerj-cs.215 ↗
3. Measuring security-durability through fuzzy based decision-making process10.2991/ijcis.d.190513.001 ↗
4. CWE-260: Password in configuration file, “Common weakness enumeration,” 2009. [Online]. Available: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/260.html.
5. A knowledge based integrated system of hesitant fuzzy set, AHP and TOPSIS for evaluating security-durability of web applications10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978038 ↗
6. CWE-494: Download of code without integrity check, “Common weakness enumeration,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/494.html.
7. Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making10.1016/j.ijar.2010.09.002 ↗
8. Hesitant fuzzy sets based symmetrical model of decision-making for estimating the durability of web application10.3390/sym12111770 ↗
9. Managing security-risks for improving security-durability of institutional web-applications: Design perspective10.32604/cmc.2020.013854 ↗
10. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076 ↗
11. Soft computing approach for prediction of software reliability
12. Security risk assessment of healthcare web application through adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system: A design perspective10.2147/RMHP.S233706 ↗
13. Needs and importance of reliability prediction: An industrial perspective10.18576/isl/090105 ↗
14. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision
15. Schiefer · Internet of Things: Security Evaluation of Nine Fitness Trackers · 2015
16. Fuzzy-based symmetrical multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating the impact of harmful factors of healthcare information security10.3390/sym12040664 ↗
17. ‘‘Revisiting software reliability10.1007/978-981-13-1402-5_17 ↗
18. Healthcare data breach report
19. The 2020-2021 Healthcare Cybersecurity Report, “A special report from the editors at cybersecurity ventures,” Herjavec Group, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://1c7fab3im83f5gqiow2qqs2k-wpengine.net-dna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/HG-Healthcare-Cybersecurity-Report-2021.pdf.