Fuzzy Risk Assessment Method for Airborne Network Security Based on AHP-TOPSIS
Source abstract
Abstract
With the exponential increase in information security risks, ensuring the safety of aircraft heavily relies on the accurate performance of risk assessment. However, experts possess a limited understanding of fundamental security elements, such as assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, due to the confidentiality of airborne networks, resulting in cognitive uncertainty. Therefore, the Pythagorean fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is proposed to address the expert cognitive uncertainty during information security risk assessment for airborne networks. First, Pythagorean fuzzy AHP is employed to construct an index system and quantify the pairwise comparison matrix for determining the index weights, which is used to solve the expert cognitive uncertainty in the process of evaluating the index system weight of airborne networks. Second, Pythagorean fuzzy the TOPSIS to an Ideal Solution is utilized to assess the risk prioritization of airborne networks using the Pythagorean fuzzy weighted distance measure, which is used to address the cognitive uncertainty in the evaluation process of various indicators in airborne network threat scenarios. Finally, a comparative analysis was conducted. The proposed method demonstrated the highest Kendall coordination coefficient of 0.952. This finding indicates superior consistency and confirms the efficacy of the method in addressing expert cognition during information security risk assessment for airborne networks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Avionics full-duplex switched (AFDX) ethernet: ARINC 664 P7 · Sep. 1, 2009
2. Airworthiness security methods and considerations: RTCA DO-356A · Jun. 21, 2018
3. Information security technology—Risk assessment method for information security: GB/T 20984-2022 · 2022 · 6
4. Security threat and vulnerability assessment and measurement in secure software development
5. Evaluation framework for electric vehicle security risk assessment10.1109/TITS.2023.3307660 ↗
6. Pythagorean fuzzy interactive Hamacher power aggregation operators for assessment of express service quality with entropy weight10.1007/s00500-020-05193-z ↗
7. Vulnerability assessment of 6G-Enabled smart grid cyber-physical systems10.1109/JIOT.2020.3042090 ↗
8. UAS cyber security hazards analysis and approach to qualitative assessment
9. Security risk assessment methodology for airborne system,” (in Chinese)
10. A security risk assessment improved model based on threat status for new airborne networks
11. An improved FAHP-cloud-based security risk assessment model for airborne networks
12. J. Li, L. Yan, J. Wang, and T. Fu, “Research on network security risk assessment method based on improved AHP,” presented at 2020 Inter. Symp. Autom., Inf. Comput. (ISAIC 2020), Beijing, China, Dec. 2–4, 2020.
13. Information security risk assessment method for electric vehicle charging piles based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
14. Extension of TOPSIS method under intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft environment based on correlation coefficient and aggregation operators to solve decision making problem10.3934/math.2021167 ↗
15. A neuroadaptive cognitive model for dealing with uncertainty in tracing pilots’ cognitive state10.1111/tops.12515 ↗
16. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets
17. ISA evaluation framework for security of internet of health things system using AHP-TOPSIS methods10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221 ↗
18. Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM method based on the cumulative prospect theory for MAGDM and its application on risk assessment of science and technology projects10.1007/s40815-020-00986-8 ↗
19. Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL method for supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116396 ↗
20. Multi-criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information10.1007/s00500-019-04105-0 ↗
21. Hwang · Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications · 1981 · 69
22. AHP integrated TOPSIS and VIKOR methods with Pythagorean fuzzy sets to prioritize risks in self-driving vehicles10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106948 ↗
23. Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets10.1002/int.21676 ↗