YOLO-LE: A Lightweight and Efficient UAV Aerial Image Target Detection Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery poses significant challenges for object detection due to extreme scale variations, high-density small targets (68% in VisDrone dataset), and complex backgrounds. While YOLO-series models achieve speed-accuracy trade-offs via fixed convolution kernels and manual feature fusion, their rigid architectures struggle with multi-scale adaptability, as exemplified by YOLOv8n’s 36.4% mAP and 13.9% small-object AP on VisDrone2019. This paper presents YOLO-LE, a lightweight framework addressing these limitations through three novel designs: (1) We introduce the C2f-Dy and LDown modules to enhance the backbone’s sensitivity to small-object features while reducing backbone parameters, thereby improving model efficiency. (2) An adaptive feature fusion module is designed to dynamically integrate multi-scale feature maps, optimizing the neck structure, reducing neck complexity, and enhancing overall model performance. (3) We replace the original loss function with a distributed focal loss and incorporate a lightweight self-attention mechanism to improve small-object recognition and bounding box regression accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLO-LE achieves 39.9% mAP@0.5 on VisDrone2019, representing a 9.6% improvement over YOLOv8n, while maintaining 8.5 GFLOPs computational efficiency. This provides an efficient solution for UAV object detection in complex scenarios.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrared Target Detection Methodologies · Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004 ↗
2. UAV-aided emergency environmental monitoring in infrastructure-less areas: lora mesh networking approach10.1109/JIOT.2021.3095494 ↗
3. Sensor planning for a symbiotic uav and ugv system for precision agriculture10.1109/TRO.2016.2603528 ↗
4. Designing mission abort strategies based on early-warning information: application to uav10.1109/TII.2019.2912427 ↗
5. Uav-mounted cloudlet systems for emergency response in industrial areas10.1109/TII.2022.3174113 ↗
6. Deep learning for unmanned aerial vehicles detection: a review10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100614 ↗
7. Jocher G, Chaurasia A, Qiu J. Ultralytics YOLO [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics.
8. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection
9. Jocher G. YOLOv5 by ultralytics [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5.
10. Lin T-Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Bourdev L, Girshick R, Hays J, et al. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context; 2015. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312.
11. Li X, Wang W, Wu L, Chen S, Hu X, Li J, et al. Generalized focal loss: learning qualified and distributed bounding boxes for dense object detection. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04388.
12. Girshick R. Fast R-CNN; 2015. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083.
13. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks; 2016. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.01497.
14. He · Computer Vision—ECCV 2014 · 2014 Sep 6–12 · 34610.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_23 ↗
15. Redmon J, Farhadi A. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement; 2018. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02767.
16. Bochkovskiy A, Wang C-Y, Liao H-YM. YOLOv4: optimal speed and accuracy of object detection; 2020. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10934.
17. Uav remote sensing detection of tea leaf blight based on DDMA-YOLO10.1016/j.compag.2023.107637 ↗
18. Sandler M, Howard A, Zhu M, Zhmoginov A, Chen L-C. MobileNetV2: inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks; 2019. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.04381.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 ↗
19. Howard A, Sandler M, Chu G, Chen L-C, Chen B, Tan M, et al. Searching for mobileNetV3; 2019. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.02244.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00140 ↗
20. Ma · Computer Vision—ECCV 2018 · 2018 Sep 8–14 · 12210.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 ↗
21. LDS-YOLO: a lightweight small object detection method for dead trees from shelter forest10.1016/j.compag.2022.107035 ↗
22. Improved yolov5s algorithm for small target detection in uav aerial photography10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3353308 ↗
23. Sunkara R, Luo T. No more strided convolutions or pooling: a new CNN building block for low-resolution images and small objects; 2022. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03641.10.1007/978-3-031-26409-2_27 ↗
24. Zhang Y-F, Ren W, Zhang Z, Jia Z, Wang L, Tan T. Focal and Efficient IOU loss for accurate bounding box regression; 2022. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08158.10.1016/j.neucom.2022.07.042 ↗
25. Wang C-Y, Liao H-YM, Yeh I-H, Wu Y-H, Chen P-Y, Hsieh J-W. CSPNet: a new backbone that can enhance learning capability of CNN; 2019. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11929.10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00203 ↗
26. Chen Y, Dai X, Liu M, Chen D, Yuan L, Liu Z. Dynamic convolution: attention over convolution kernels; 2020. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.03458.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01104 ↗
27. Detection and tracking meet drones challenge10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3119563 ↗
28. Liu · Computer Vision—ECCV 2016 · 2016 Oct 11–14 · 2110.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
29. Cdnet: centripetal direction network for nuclear instance segmentation
30. Li C, Li L, Jiang H, Weng K, Geng Y, Li L, et al. YOLOv6: a single-stage object detection framework for industrial applications; 2022. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.02976.
31. Zhao Y, Lv W, Xu S, Wei J, Wang G, Dang Q, et al. DETRs beat YOLOs on real-time object detection; 2024. [cited 2025 Apr 20]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.08069.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗