Robust Length of Stay Prediction Model for Indoor Patients
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to unforeseen climate change, complicated chronic diseases, and mutation of viruses’ hospital administration’s top challenge is to know about the Length of stay (LOS) of different diseased patients in the hospitals. Hospital management does not exactly know when the existing patient leaves the hospital; this information could be crucial for hospital management. It could allow them to take more patients for admission. As a result, hospitals face many problems managing available resources and new patients in getting entries for their prompt treatment. Therefore, a robust model needs to be designed to help hospital administration predict patients’ LOS to resolve these issues. For this purpose, a very large-sized data (more than 2.3 million patients’ data) related to New-York Hospitals patients and containing information about a wide range of diseases including Bone-Marrow, Tuberculosis, Intestinal Transplant, Mental illness, Leukaemia, Spinal cord injury, Trauma, Rehabilitation, Kidney and Alcoholic Patients, HIV Patients, Malignant Breast disorder, Asthma, Respiratory distress syndrome, etc. have been analyzed to predict the LOS. We selected six Machine learning (ML) models named: Multiple linear regression (MLR), Lasso regression (LR), Ridge regression (RR), Decision tree regression (DTR), Extreme gradient boosting regression (XGBR), and Random Forest regression (RFR). The selected models’ predictive performance was checked using R square and Mean square error (MSE) as the performance evaluation criteria. Our results revealed the superior predictive performance of the RFR model, both in terms of RS score (92%) and MSE score (5), among all selected models. By Exploratory data analysis (EDA), we conclude that maximum stay was between 0 to 5 days with the meantime of each patient 5.3 days and more than 50 years old patients spent more days in the hospital. Based on the average LOS, results revealed that the patients with diagnoses related to birth complications spent more days in the hospital than other diseases. This finding could help predict the future length of hospital stay of new patients, which will help the hospital administration estimate and manage their resources efficiently.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Healthcare · Frailty in Older Adults · Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of COVID-19 confirmed cases using gradient boosting regression method10.32604/cmc.2020.012045 ↗
2. Emergency departments and the COVID-19 pandemic: Making the most of limited resources10.1136/emermed-2020-209660 ↗
3. Data analytics for the sustainable use of resources in hospitals: Predicting the length of stay for patients with chronic diseases
4. Predicting the prolonged length of stay of general surgery patients: A supervised learning approach10.1111/itor.12298 ↗
5. Comparing different supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8 ↗
6. Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning10.3758/BF03196342 ↗
7. Predictors of in-hospital length of stay among cardiac patients: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.046 ↗
8. A comparison of supervised machine learning techniques for predicting short-term in-hospital length of stay among diabetic patients
9. Prediction of general medical admission length of stay with natural language processing and deep learning: A pilot study10.1007/s11739-019-02265-3 ↗
10. Predicting in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay in diabetic patients10.1016/j.jval.2013.03.103 ↗
11. Brain tumor analysis empowered with deep learning: A review, taxonomy, and future challenges10.3390/brainsci10020118 ↗
12. Predicting the length of hospital stay of burn patients: Comparisons of prediction accuracy among different clinical stages10.1016/j.dss.2010.09.001 ↗
13. Predicting the prolonged length of stay of general surgery patients: a supervised learning approach10.1111/itor.12298 ↗
14. Length of stay predictions: Improvements through the use of automated laboratory and comorbidity variables10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181e359f3 ↗
15. SPARCE, “Hospital inpatient discharges (SPARCS De-Identified). State of New York, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://healthdata.gov/dataset/hospital-inpatient-discharges-sparcs-de-identified.
16. Exploratory data analysis10.1016/B978-0-444-59528-7.00003-X ↗
17. Correlation analysis to identify the effective data in machine learning: Prediction of depressive disorder and emotion states10.3390/ijerph15122907 ↗
18. Multiple regression model for fast prediction of the heating energy demand10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.010 ↗
19. High-dimensional LASSO-based computational regression models: regularization, shrinkage, and selection10.3390/make1010021 ↗
20. Improving the estimators of the parameters of a probit regression model: A ridge regression approach10.1016/j.jspi.2011.12.023 ↗
21. Loh · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality and Reliability · 2008 · 1 · 315
22. Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008 ↗
23. Predicting mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using XGBoost model10.1371/journal.pone.0246306 ↗
24. Random forest models to predict aqueous solubility10.1021/ci060164k ↗
25. Classification and regression by random forest
26. Cross-validation methods10.1006/jmps.1999.1279 ↗
27. On the usefulness of cross-validation for directional forecast evaluation10.1016/j.csda.2014.02.001 ↗
28. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01818-0 ↗
29. Feature selection using decision tree and classification through proximal support vector machine for fault diagnostics of roller bearing10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.004 ↗
30. Selection of important features and predicting wine quality using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.041 ↗