Weber Law Based Approach for Multi-Class Image Forgery Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
Today’s forensic science introduces a new research area for digital image analysis for multimedia security. So, Image authentication issues have been raised due to the wide use of image manipulation software to obtain an illegitimate benefit or create misleading publicity by using tempered images. Exiting forgery detection methods can classify only one of the most widely used Copy-Move and splicing forgeries. However, an image can contain one or more types of forgeries. This study has proposed a hybrid method for classifying Copy-Move and splicing images using texture information of images in the spatial domain. Firstly, images are divided into equal blocks to get scale-invariant features. Weber law has been used for getting texture features, and finally, XGBOOST is used to classify both Copy-Move and splicing forgery. The proposed method classified three types of forgeries, i.e., splicing, Copy-Move, and healthy. Benchmarked (CASIA 2.0, MICCF200) and RCMFD datasets are used for training and testing. On average, the proposed method achieved 97.3% accuracy on benchmarked datasets and 98.3% on RCMFD datasets by applying 10-fold cross-validation, which is far better than existing methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital Media Forensic Detection · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. State of the art in passive digital image forgery detection: Copy-Move image forgery10.1007/s10044-017-0678-8 ↗
2. New texture descriptor based on modified fractional entropy for digital image splicing forgery detection10.3390/e21040371 ↗
3. An efficient image forgery detection using biorthogonal wavelet transform and improved relevance vector machine10.1007/s11277-018-5802-6 ↗
4. CNN based image forgery detection using pre-trained AlexNet model
5. Localization of Copy-Move forgery in digital images through differential excitation texture features10.22266/ijies2019.0430.05 ↗
6. An improved block-based Copy-Move forgery detection technique10.1007/s11042-019-08354-x ↗
7. Multi-level deep learning model for potato leaf disease recognition10.3390/electronics10172064 ↗
8. Real-time multiple guava leaf disease detection from a single leaf using hybrid deep learning technique10.32604/cmc.2023.032005 ↗
9. Pixel-level Road crack detection in UAV remote sensing images based on ARD-Unet10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113252 ↗
10. Skin cancer detection using ensemble of machine learning and deep learning technique
11. The role of machine learning and deep learning approaches for the detection of skin caner10.3390/healthcare11030415 ↗
12. Gabor filter bank with deep autoencoder based face recognition system10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116743 ↗
13. Cross-cultural facial expression recognition using gradient features and support vector machine
14. Image splicing detection using discriminative robust local binary pattern and support vector machine10.1108/WJE-09-2020-0456 ↗
15. Copy-move forgery detection using local tetra pattern-based texture descriptor
16. Image forgery detection based on statistical features of block DCT coefficients10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.038 ↗
17. Improved Copy-Move forgery detection using sift with adaptive over kernel principal component analysis
18. Utilization of edge operators for localization of Copy-Move image forgery using WLD-HOG features with connected component labeling10.1007/s11042-020-09230-9 ↗
19. A comparative analysis by KNN, SVM & ELM classification to detect sickle cell anemia
20. Copy-move forgery detection using SURF feature extraction and SVM supervised learning technique10.1007/s00500-020-04795-x ↗
21. Logistic regression versus XGBoost: Machine learning for counterfeit news detection
22. Casia image tampering detection evaluation database
23. T. T. Ng, S. F. Chang, J. Hsu and M. Pepeljugoski, “Columbia photographic images and photorealistic computer graphics dataset,” Columbia University, ADVENT Technical Report, pp. 205–2004, Columbia University, 2005.
24. Edge-texture feature-based image forgery detection with cross-dataset evaluation10.1007/s00138-019-01048-2 ↗
25. Copy-move forgery detection system through fused color and texture features using firefly algorithm
26. Copy-move forgery detection technique based on discrete cosine transform blocks features10.1007/s00521-020-05433-1 ↗
27. Fast and robust Copy-Move forgery detection based on scale-space representation10.1007/s11042-017-5248-y ↗
28. Image forgery detection and localization via a reliability fusion map10.3390/s20226668 ↗
29. Hybrid LSTM and encoder-decoder architecture for detection of image forgeries10.1109/TIP.2019.2895466 ↗
30. Copy-move forgery detection (CMFD) using deep learning for image and video forensics10.3390/jimaging7030059 ↗
31. Copy-move forgery detection and localization using a generative adversarial network and convolutional neural-network10.3390/info10090286 ↗
32. A. Howard, A. Zhmoginov, L. C. Chen, M. Sandler and M. Zhu, “Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks: Mobile networks for classification, detection and segmentation,” 2018.
33. Lightweight deep learning model for detection of Copy-Move image forgery with post-processed attacks
34. Digital image forgery detection using deep autoencoder and CNN features
35. Image forgery detection based on fusion of lightweight deep learning models10.3906/elk-2005-37 ↗