Sustainable Supplier Selection Model in Supply Chains During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Source abstract
Abstract
As global supply chains become more developed and complicated, supplier quality has become increasingly influential on the competitiveness of businesses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Consequently, supplier selection is an increasingly important process for any business around the globe. Choosing a supplier is a complex decision that can result in lower procurement costs and increased profits without increasing the cost or lowering the quality of the product. However, these decision-making problems can be complicated in cases with multiple potential suppliers. Vietnam's textile and garment industry, for example, has made rapid progress in recent years but is still facing great difficulties as the supply of raw materials and machinery depends heavily on foreign countries. Therefore, it is extremely important for textile and garment manufacturing companies in Vietnam to implement an effective supplier evaluation and selection process. While multicriteria decision-making models are frequently employed to assist with supplier evaluation and selection problems, few of these models consider the problem under the condition of a fuzzy decision-making environment. The aim of this paper is to create a hybrid MCDM model using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) model and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assist the supplier selection process in the garment industry in a fuzzy decision-making environment. In this study, the FAHP method is used to evaluate the performance and the weight of each criterion. TOPSIS is then used to rank all potential suppliers. The proposed model is then applied to a real-world case study to demonstrate both the process of calculation as well as its real-world applicability. The results from the case study provide empirical evidence that the model is feasible. The proposed approach can also be used in combination with other MCDM models to better support decision makers and can be modified to be applied in similar supplier selection processes for different industries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Bozarth · Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management · 2015
2. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009 ↗
3. An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem
4. An integrated approach for supplier selection10.1108/09576050310503376 ↗
5. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1 ↗
6. Supplier selection problem: A comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches10.1108/13598540210436586 ↗
7. Use of analytic hierarchic process for evaluating sources of supply10.1108/09600039310039160 ↗
8. An analytical approach to supplier selection10.1111/j.1745-493X.1983.tb00092.x ↗
9. Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure10.1111/j.1745-493X.1992.tb00561.x ↗
10. Vendor selection criteria and methods10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R ↗
11. Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme: A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600797 ↗
12. Supplier environmental performance evaluation using AHP
13. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2 ↗
14. Analyzing alternatives for improvement in supply chain performance10.1108/00438020210415497 ↗
15. Hub location at digital equipment corporation: A comprehensive analysis of qualitative and quantitative factors10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00138-2 ↗
16. A model for strategic supplier selection10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00117.x ↗
17. A hybrid fuzzy analytic network process approach to the new product development selection problem10.1155/2014/485016 ↗
18. A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.008 ↗
19. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x ↗
20. Supplier evaluation and selection via taguchi loss functions and an AHP10.1007/s00170-004-2227-z ↗
21. An approach to vendor performance evaluation10.1111/j.1745-493X.1986.tb00168.x ↗
22. Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms
23. Intelligent MCDM method for supplier selection under fuzzy environment
24. Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model (MCDM) for raw materials supplier selection in plastics industry10.3390/math7100981 ↗
25. MCDM tools application for selection of suppliers in manufacturing industries using AHP, fuzzy logic and ANN10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.19.130 ↗
26. Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined grey-marcos methods
27. A novel approach for supplier selection based on the kano model and fuzzy MCDM10.1080/00207543.2013.784403 ↗
28. Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS)10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231 ↗
29. A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model for sustainable supplier evaluation and selection based on triple bottom line approaches in the garment industry10.3390/pr7070400 ↗
30. Fishmeal supplier evaluation and selection for aquaculture enterprise sustainability with a fuzzy MCDM approach10.3390/sym9110286 ↗
31. Supplier selection based on corporate social responsibility practices10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.003 ↗
32. Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031 ↗
33. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009 ↗
34. An integrated best-worst and interval type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection10.3390/math7020182 ↗
35. Supplier selection model using taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming10.1016/j.cie.2009.12.004 ↗
36. Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030 ↗
37. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max–min approach10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00230-8 ↗
38. An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.018 ↗
39. An integrated fuzzy-lp approach for a supplier selection problem in supply chain management10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.021 ↗
40. Vendor selection with price breaks10.1016/0377-2217(93)90232-C ↗
41. Vendor selection with bundling10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb00836.x ↗
42. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7 ↗
43. Supplier selection using multi-objective programming: A decision support system approach10.1108/09600039310038161 ↗
44. A multi-objective model for purchasing of bulk raw materials of a large-scale integrated steel plant10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00373-0 ↗
45. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010 ↗
46. Multi-objective decision-making in supplier selection: An application of visual interactive goal programming10.19030/jabr.v15i2.5679 ↗
47. Integrated multi-choice goal programming and multi-segment goal programming for supplier selection considering imperfect-quality and price-quantity discounts in a multiple sourcing environment10.1080/00207721.2012.745024 ↗
48. A strategy-based framework for supplier selection: A grey PCA-DEA approach
49. Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: An MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.005 ↗
50. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: Distributionally robust goal programming model and tractable approximation10.1016/j.cie.2020.106267 ↗
51. Supplier selection and order allocation in closed-loop supply chain systems using hybrid monte carlo simulation and goal programming10.1080/00207543.2015.1054452 ↗
52. Development of a decision support system for supplier evaluation and order allocation10.1016/j.eswa.2011.10.024 ↗
53. Analytic network process and multi-period goal programming integration in purchasing decisions10.1016/j.cie.2006.12.006 ↗
54. Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.017 ↗
55. Supplier selection and order allocation problem using a two-phase fuzzy multi-objective linear programming10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.045 ↗
56. Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: Integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches10.1007/s10479-015-2004-4 ↗
57. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.012 ↗
58. Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.071 ↗
59. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: A fuzzy approach10.1080/0305215X.2019.1663185 ↗
60. Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.018 ↗
61. A model integrating environmental concerns and supply risks for dynamic sustainable supplier selection and order allocation10.1007/s00500-020-05165-3 ↗
62. A New integrated multi-criteria decision making and multi-objective programming model for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation10.3390/sym12020302 ↗
63. Interactive fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a resilient supply chain10.3390/math7020137 ↗
64. COVID- 19: Outcomes for global supply chains10.2478/mmcks-2020-0025 ↗
65. Will the COVID-19 pandemic really change the governance of global value chains10.1111/1467-8551.12422 ↗
66. Fuzzy sets10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X ↗
67. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.045 ↗
68. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052 ↗
69. Fuzzy multiple goal programming applied to TFT-lCD supplier selection by downstream manufacturers10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.044 ↗
70. Priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication by fuzzy AHP ranking10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.035 ↗
71. Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00348-5 ↗
72. Employing fuzzy ANP for green supplier selection and order allocations: A case study
73. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 ↗
74. The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003 ↗
75. Hwang · Multiple Attribute Decision Making · 198110.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 ↗
76. A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions10.1057/jors.1987.44 ↗
77. A new approach for multiple objective decision making10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V ↗