journal article·2022Open access

Experimental Analysis of Methods Used to Solve Linear Regression Models

Mua’ad Abu-Faraj, Abeer Al-Hyari, Ziad Alqadi

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 72· Issue 3

Abstract

Predicting the value of one or more variables using the values of other variables is a very important process in the various engineering experiments that include large data that are difficult to obtain using different measurement processes. Regression is one of the most important types of supervised machine learning, in which labeled data is used to build a prediction model, regression can be classified into three different categories: linear, polynomial, and logistic. In this research paper, different methods will be implemented to solve the linear regression problem, where there is a linear relationship between the target and the predicted output. Various methods for linear regression will be analyzed using the calculated Mean Square Error (MSE) between the target values and the predicted outputs. A huge set of regression samples will be used to construct the training dataset with selected sizes. A detailed comparison will be performed between three methods, including least-square fit; Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (FFANN), and Cascade Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (CFFANN), and recommendations will be raised. The proposed method has been tested in this research on random data samples, and the results were compared with the results of the most common method, which is the linear multiple regression method. It should be noted here that the procedures for building and testing the neural network will remain constant even if another sample of data is used.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neural Networks and Applications · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Stock Market Forecasting Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn10.3389/fninf.2014.00014 ↗
2. Understanding of a convolutional neural network
3. On ignoring the random effects assumption in multilevel models: Review, critique, and recommendations10.1177/1094428119877457 ↗
4. Opening the black box: Interpretable machine learning for genetics10.1016/j.tig.2020.03.005 ↗
5. Barends · “Evidence-Based Management: How to Use Evidence to Make Better Organizational Decisions · 2018
6. Numerical solutions for solving model time-fractional Fokker-Planck equation10.1002/num.22570 ↗
7. Optimal and memristor-based control of a nonlinear fractional tumor-immune model10.32604/cmc.2021.015161 ↗
8. Fixed and random effects models: Making an informed choice10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x ↗
9. Multilevel methods: Future directions in measurement, longitudinal analyses, and nonnormal outcomes10.1177/1094428107301102 ↗
10. Bagging predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
11. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
12. Classification and regression trees
13. Random forests for high-dimensional longitudinal data10.1177/0962280220946080 ↗
14. Machine learning for pattern discovery in management research10.1002/smj.3215 ↗
15. Growing apart: The changing firm-size wage premium and its inequality consequences10.1287/orsc.2017.1125 ↗
16. Davison · Bootstrap Methods and Their Application · 199710.1017/CBO9780511802843 ↗
17. ClusterBootstrap: An R package for the analysis of hierarchical data using generalized linear models with the cluster bootstrap10.3758/s13428-019-01252-y ↗
18. All models are wrong, but many are useful: Learning a variable's importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously
19. Fox · Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models · 2015
20. Pattern classification with missing data: A review10.1007/s00521-009-0295-6 ↗
21. A review of machine learning applications in human resource management
22. Machine learning for social science: An agnostic approach10.1146/annurev-polisci-053119-015921 ↗
23. The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modelling10.1037/met0000239 ↗
24. Machine learning capabilities of a simulated cerebellum10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2512838 ↗
25. Support vector machines10.1109/5254.708428 ↗
26. Simple explanation of the no-free-lunch theorem and its implications10.1023/A:1021251113462 ↗