journal article·2021Open access

Optimal Selection of Hybrid Renewable Energy System Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Algorithms

Hegazy Rezk, Irik Z. Mukhametzyanov, Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, Hamdy A. Ziedan

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 68· Issue 2

Abstract

Several models of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) have identified the optimal alternative electrical energy sources to supply certain load in an isolated region in Al-Minya City, Egypt. The load demand consists of water pumping system with a water desalination unit. Various options containing three different power sources: only DG, PV-B system, and hybrid PV-DG-B, two different sizes of reverse osmosis (RO) units; RO-250 and RO-500, two strategies of energy management; load following (LF) and cycle charging (CC), and two sizes of DG; 5 and 10 kW were taken into account. Eight attributes, including operating cost, renewable fraction, initial cost, the cost of energy, excess energy, unmet load, breakeven grid extension distance, and the amount of CO 2 , were used during the evaluation process. To estimate these parameters, HOMER ® software was employed to perform both the simulation and optimization process. Four different weight estimation methods were considered; no priority of criteria, based on a pairwise comparisons matrix of the criteria, CRITIC-method, and entropy-based method. The main findings (output results) confirmed that the optimal option for the case study was hybrid PV-DG-B with the following specification: 5 kW DG, RO-500, and load following control strategy. Under this condition, the annual operating cost and initial costs were $ 5546 and $ 161022, respectively, whereas the cost of energy was 0.077 $/kWh. The excess energy and unmet loads were 40998 and 2371 kWh, respectively. The breakeven grid extension distance and the amount of CO 2 were 3.31 km and 5171 kg per year, respectively. Compared with DG only, the amount of CO 2 has been sharply reduced by 113939 kg per year.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Energy and Environment Impacts · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Limiting global warming by improving data-centre software10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978306 ↗
2. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The VIKOR method10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031 ↗
3. Hwang · Multiple Attributes Decision Making: Methods and Applications · 198110.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 ↗
4. Triantaphyllou · Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study · 2000
5. Tzeng · Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Application · 201110.1201/b11032 ↗
6. Multi-criteria evaluation in strategic environmental assessment for waste management plan, a case study: The city of Belgrade10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.003 ↗
7. Multiple criteria decisions making and decision support systems for flood risk management10.1007/s00477-005-0009-2 ↗
8. Environmental-economic decision–making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques10.1016/S0308-521X(99)00021-9 ↗
9. Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9 ↗
10. The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): A new software tool to support environmental investment decision making10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.06.015 ↗
11. Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The VIKOR method10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.031 ↗
12. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 ↗
13. A linguistic decision support model towards the promotion of renewable energy10.1080/15567240701620432 ↗
14. Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.067 ↗
15. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.162 ↗
16. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010 ↗
17. Geographical information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in southeastern Spain10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.019 ↗
18. A hybrid tool to combine multi-objective optimization and multi-criterion decision making in designing standalone hybrid energy systems10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.049 ↗
19. Comparative assessment of road transport technologies10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.021 ↗
20. Optimization and energy management of hybrid photovoltaic-diesel-battery system to pump and desalinate water at isolated regions10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998720 ↗
21. M. A. K. Water, [Online]. Available: https://www.makwater.com.au/products/sea-water-reverse-osmosis/ (Accessed on 24 September 2020).
22. An optimal sizing of stand-alone hybrid PV-fuel cell-battery to desalinate seawater at Saudi NEOM city10.3390/pr8040382 ↗
23. Performance evaluation and optimal design of stand-alone solar PV-battery system for irrigation in isolated regions: A case study in Al Minya (Egypt)10.1016/j.seta.2019.100556 ↗
24. Distribution generation by photovoltaic and diesel generator systems: Energy management and size optimization by a new approach for a stand-alone application10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.105 ↗
25. Novel soft-switching integrated boost DC–DC converter for PV power system10.3390/en13030749 ↗
26. A Solar-wind hybrid power system for irrigation in Toshka area
27. Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction
28. Application of fuzzy MOORA and GRA in multi-criterion decision making problems10.5120/8452-2249 ↗
29. Portfolio management: Stock ranking by multiple attribute decision making methods10.4236/ti.2015.64016 ↗
30. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5 ↗
31. Linear, quadratic, and bilinear programming approaches to the linear complementarity problem10.1016/0377-2217(86)90043-3 ↗
32. A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.022 ↗
33. ReS-algorithm for converting normalized values of cost criteria into benefit criteria in MCDM tasks10.1142/S0219622020500327 ↗
34. Saaty · The Analytic Hierarchy Process · 1980
35. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H ↗
36. Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.046 ↗
37. Sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach
38. I. Z. Mukhametzyanov, “MCDM_tools. Mathworks,” [Online]. Available: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/65742-mcdm-tools (Accessed on 20 October 2020).