journal article·2021Open access

Fully Automatic Segmentation of Gynaecological Abnormality Using a New Viola-Jones Model

Ihsan Jasim Hussein, M.A. Burhanuddin, Mazin Abed Mohammed, Mohamed Elhoseny, Begonya Garcia-Zapirain, Marwah Suliman Maashi, Mashael S. Maashi

Computers, Materials & Continua· Volume 66· Issue 3

Abstract

One of the most complex tasks for computer-aided diagnosis (Intelligent decision support system) is the segmentation of lesions. Thus, this study proposes a new fully automated method for the segmentation of ovarian and breast ultrasound images. The main contributions of this research is the development of a novel Viola–James model capable of segmenting the ultrasound images of breast and ovarian cancer cases. In addition, proposed an approach that can efficiently generate region-of-interest (ROI) and new features that can be used in characterizing lesion boundaries. This study uses two databases in training and testing the proposed segmentation approach. The breast cancer database contains 250 images, while that of the ovarian tumor has 100 images obtained from several hospitals in Iraq. Results of the experiments showed that the proposed approach demonstrates better performance compared with those of other segmentation methods used for segmenting breast and ovarian ultrasound images. The segmentation result of the proposed system compared with the other existing techniques in the breast cancer data set was 78.8%. By contrast, the segmentation result of the proposed system in the ovarian tumor data set was 79.2%. In the classification results, we achieved 95.43% accuracy, 92.20% sensitivity, and 97.5% specificity when we used the breast cancer data set. For the ovarian tumor data set, we achieved 94.84% accuracy, 96.96% sensitivity, and 90.32% specificity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Smart Systems and Machine Learning · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Automatic CT ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention10.1016/j.media.2008.06.006 ↗
2. A survey on nature-inspired medical image analysis: A step further in biomedical data integration10.3233/FI-2020-1887 ↗
3. Decision-level fusion scheme for nasopharyngeal carcinoma identification using machine learning techniques10.1007/s00521-018-3882-6 ↗
4. Neural network and multi-fractal dimension features for breast cancer classification from ultrasound images10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.01.033 ↗
5. Deep semantic segmentation of natural and medical images: A review
6. Image super-resolution using progressive generative adversarial networks for medical image analysis10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.005 ↗
7. K-means clustering and neural network for object detecting and identifying abnormality of brain tumor10.1007/s00500-018-3618-7 ↗
8. Evaluating the performance of machine learning techniques in the classification of wisconsin breast cancer10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.23737 ↗
9. Fully automatic model-based segmentation and classification approach for MRI brain tumor using artificial neural networks10.1002/cpe.4962 ↗
10. Artificial intelligence for medical image analysis: A guide for authors and reviewers10.2214/AJR.18.20490 ↗
11. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative, controls-based denoising, a new approach for medical image analysis, improves prediction of conversion to alzheimer’s disease with fdg-pet10.1007/s00259-019-04400-w ↗
12. Multi-modal medical image segmentation based on vector-valued active contour models10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.051 ↗
13. Detection of ovarian tumors in obstetric ultrasound imaging using logistic regression classifier with an advanced machine learning approach10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2977962 ↗
14. Machine learning and region growing for breast cancer segmentation
15. Trainable model based on new uniform LBP feature to identify the risk of the breast cancer
16. Clinical decision support systems in breast cancer: A systematic review10.3390/cancers12020369 ↗
17. Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems using advanced medical imaging and radiomics
18. Machine learning for medical imaging10.1148/rg.2017160130 ↗
19. Observational multicenter study on the prognostic relevance of coagulation activation in risk assessment and stratification in locally advanced breast cancer. Outline of the ARIAS Trial10.3390/cancers12040849 ↗
20. Ovarian cancer stage based detection on convolutional neural network
21. Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers10.1186/bcr3670 ↗
22. N. Harrington, “Segmentation of human ovarian follicles from ultrasound images acquired’ in vivo’ using geometric active contour models and a naïve bayes classifier,” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Saskatchewan, Canada, 2007.
23. Landgren · Medical Imaging: Image Processing · 2013 · 8669 · 866945
24. Finding out general tendencies in speckle noise reduction in ultrasound images10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.029 ↗
25. Towards breast ultrasound image segmentation using multi-resolution pixel descriptors
26. Semi–supervised segmentation of ultrasound images based on patch representation and continuous min cut10.1371/journal.pone.0100972 ↗
27. First trimester levels of BV-associated bacteria and risk of miscarriage among women early in pregnancy10.1007/s10995-015-1790-2 ↗
28. T. J. Hanchard, “Novel early first trimester ultrasound measures in the prediction of miscarriage, small-for-gestational age neonates and maternal hypertensive disorders,” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia, 2020.
29. An automated segmentation technique for the processing of foot ultrasound images
30. Medical ultrasound image segmentation based on improved watershed scheme
31. Agrawal · 2015 · 108
32. Cascade convolutional neural networks for automatic detection of thyroid nodules in ultrasound images10.1002/mp.12134 ↗
33. P. S. Rodrigues, “Breast ultrasound image dataset,” Version 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/wmy84gzngw/1.