Cyberbullying-related Hate Speech Detection Using Shallow-to-deep Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Communication in society had developed within cultural and geographical boundaries prior to the invention of digital technology. The latest advancements in communication technology have significantly surpassed the conventional constraints for communication with regards to time and location. These new platforms have ushered in a new age of user-generated content, online chats, social network and comprehensive data on individual behavior. However, the abuse of communication software such as social media websites, online communities, and chats has resulted in a new kind of online hostility and aggressive actions. Due to widespread use of the social networking platforms and technological gadgets, conventional bullying has migrated from physical form to online, where it is termed as Cyberbullying. However, recently the digital technologies as machine learning and deep learning have been showing their efficiency in identifying linguistic patterns used by cyberbullies and cyberbullying detection problem. In this research paper, we aimed to evaluate shallow machine learning and deep learning methods in cyberbullying detection problem. We deployed three deep and six shallow learning algorithms for cyberbullying detection problems. The results show that bidirectional long-short-term memory is the most efficient method for cyberbullying detection, in terms of accuracy and recall.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of machine learning techniques for cyberbullying detection on youtube arabic comments
2. Cyberbullying detection: Advanced preprocessing techniques & deep learning architecture for roman urdu data10.1186/s40537-021-00550-7 ↗
3. Harnessing the power of interdisciplinary research with psychology-informed cyberbullying detection models10.1007/s42380-021-00107-5 ↗
4. Automatic cyberbullying detection: A Mexican case in high school and Higher Education Students10.1109/TLA.2022.9693561 ↗
5. Natural language processing and machine learning based cyberbullying detection for Bangla and romanized bangla texts10.12928/telkomnika.v20i1.18630 ↗
6. Modified UNet model for brain stroke lesion segmentation on computed tomography images10.32604/cmc.2022.020998 ↗
7. Artificial intelligence-enabled cyberbullying-free online social networks in smart cities10.1007/s44196-022-00063-y ↗
8. Cyberbullying detection in twitter using sentiment analysis
9. Aggression detection through deep neural model on twitter10.1016/j.future.2020.07.050 ↗
10. Artificial bee colony-based feature selection algorithm for cyberbullying10.1093/comjnl/bxaa066 ↗
11. Curating cyberbullying datasets: A human-AI collaborative approach10.1007/s42380-021-00114-6 ↗
12. A mobile-based system for preventing online abuse and cyberbullying10.1007/s42380-021-00115-5 ↗
13. Cyber-aggression, cyberbullying, and cyber-grooming: A survey and research challenges10.1145/3424246 ↗
14. Denigrate comment detection in low-resource Hindi language using attention-based residual networks
15. Abusive Bangla comments detection on Facebook using transformer-based deep learning models10.1007/s13278-021-00852-x ↗
16. A stochastic algorithm based on reverse sampling technique to fight against the cyberbullying10.1145/3441455 ↗
17. Slangs and short forms of malay twitter sentiment analysis using supervised machine learning
18. Automatic classification of participant roles in cyberbullying: Can we detect victims, bullies, and bystanders in social media text?10.1017/S135132492000056X ↗
19. Keeping children safe online with limited resources: Analyzing what is seen and heard10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114389 ↗
20. Multi-modal aggression identification using convolutional neural network and binary particle swarm optimization10.1016/j.future.2021.01.014 ↗
21. Social network analysis using deep learning: Applications and schemes10.1007/s13278-021-00799-z ↗
22. Deep vision-based surveillance system to prevent train-elephant collisions10.1007/s00500-021-06493-8 ↗
23. Advanced data mining tools and methods for social computing10.1093/comjnl/bxab032 ↗
24. Trustworthy machine learning10.1109/MIS.2022.3152946 ↗
25. Impact of SMOTE on imbalanced text features for toxic comments classification using RVVC model10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083638 ↗
26. Tackling cyber-aggression: Identification and fine-grained categorization of aggressive texts on social media using weighted ensemble of transformers10.1016/j.neucom.2021.12.022 ↗
27. Bilingual cyber-aggression detection on social media using LSTM autoencoder10.1007/s00500-021-05817-y ↗
28. The impact of data processing and ensemble on breast cancer detection using deep learning10.21608/jocc.2022.218453 ↗
29. Defining and detecting toxicity on social media: Context and knowledge are key10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.095 ↗
30. When the bad is good and the good is bad: Understanding cyber social health through online behavioral change10.1109/MIC.2020.3045232 ↗
31. Prosociality in cyberspace: Developing emotion and behavioral regulation to decrease aggressive communication10.1007/s12559-021-09852-7 ↗
32. Classifying cybergrooming for child online protection using hybrid machine learning model10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.148 ↗
33. L. Cuoghi and L. Konopelko, “Cyberbullying classification,” (accessed on 25 June 2022), 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/andrewmvd/cyberbullying-classification.
34. D. Bruwaene, Q. Huang and D. Inkpen, “A multi-platform dataset for detecting cyberbullying in social media,” (accessed on 25 June 2022), 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1007/s10579-020-09488-3.
35. A. Samoshyn, “Hate speech and offensive language dataset,” (accessed on 25 June 2022), 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mrmorj/hate-speech-and-offensive-language-dataset.
36. Written and visual cyberbullying victimization in adolescence: Shared and unique associated factors10.1080/17405629.2020.1810661 ↗
37. Threatening language detection and target identification in urdu tweets10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112500 ↗
38. Deep learning-based sentiment analysis of facebook data: The case of turkish users10.1093/comjnl/bxaa172 ↗
39. Artificial intelligence in medicine: Real time electronic stethoscope for heart diseases detection10.32604/cmc.2022.019246 ↗
40. Categorizing sexism and misogyny through neural approaches10.1145/3457189 ↗
41. Confronting abusive language online: A survey from the ethical and human rights perspective10.1613/jair.1.12590 ↗
42. Detecting misogyny in Spanish tweets. An approach based on linguistics features and word embeddings10.1016/j.future.2020.08.032 ↗
43. Thirty years of research into hate speech: topics of interest and their evolution10.1007/s11192-020-03737-6 ↗
44. A decade of sentic computing: topic modeling and bibliometric analysis10.1007/s12559-021-09861-6 ↗
45. BullyNet: Unmasking cyberbullies on social networks10.1109/TCSS.2021.3049232 ↗
46. Online social network security: A comparative review using machine learning and deep learning10.1007/s11063-020-10416-3 ↗
47. A survey of defensive deception: Approaches using game theory and machine learning10.1109/COMST.2021.3102874 ↗
48. Employing lexicalized dependency paths for active learning of relation extraction10.32604/iasc.2022.030794 ↗
49. Electronic stethoscope for heartbeat abnormality detection
50. Categorization of customer complaints in food industry using machine learning approaches
51. A skeleton-based approach for campus violence detection10.32604/cmc.2022.024566 ↗