Understanding the Language of ISIS: An Empirical Approach to Detect Radical Content on Twitter Using Machine Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
The internet, particularly online social networking platforms have revolutionized the way extremist groups are influencing and radicalizing individuals. Recent research reveals that the process initiates by exposing vast audiences to extremist content and then migrating potential victims to confined platforms for intensive radicalization. Consequently, social networks have evolved as a persuasive tool for extremism aiding as recruitment platform and psychological warfare. Thus, recognizing potential radical text or material is vital to restrict the circulation of the extremist chronicle. The aim of this research work is to identify radical text in social media. Our contributions are as follows: (i) A new dataset to be employed in radicalization detection; (ii) In depth analysis of new and previous datasets so that the variation in extremist group narrative could be identified; (iii) An approach to train classifier employing religious features along with radical features to detect radicalization; (iv) Observing the use of violent and bad words in radical, neutral and random groups by employing violent, terrorism and bad words dictionaries. Our research results clearly indicate that incorporating religious text in model training improves the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of the classifiers. Secondly a variation in extremist narrative has been observed implying that usage of new dataset can have substantial effect on classifier performance. In addition to this, violence and bad words are creating a differentiating factor between radical and random users but for neutral (anti-ISIS) group it needs further investigation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Spam and Phishing Detection · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. International Association of Chiefs of Police.Online Radicalization to Violent Extremism Awareness Brief,2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/RadicalizationtoViolentExtremismAwarenessBrief.pdf.
2. Disrupting daesh: measuring takedown of online terrorist material and its impacts10.1080/1057610X.2018.1513984 ↗
3. Identifying radical content online
4. Terrorist use of the internet by the numbers: Quantifying behaviors, patterns, and processes10.1111/1745-9133.12249 ↗
5. Anders behring breivik spent years training and plotting for massacre
6. Z.Chesser, “A case study in online islamist radicalization and its meaning for the threat of homegrown terrorism,” Washington, DC: Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, 2012. [Online]. Available: www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CHESSER FINAL REPORT%281%29.pdf.
7. Why ISIS is winning the social media war?
8. W.Magdy, K.Darwish and I.Weber, “Failedrevolutions: Using twitter to study the antecedents of ISIS support,” 2015. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.02401v1.pdf.10.5210/fm.v21i2.6372 ↗
9. Jordan · Leadership Decapitation: Strategic Targeting of Terrorist Organizations · 2019
10. ISIS names new leader and confirms al-baghdadi’s death
11. Death toll in pakistan mosque suicide bombing rises to 15
12. At least 25 people dead after hours-long attack on sikh complex in kabul
13. Terrorist attacks: a map of terrorist attacks, according to Wikipedia
14. Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008 ↗
15. Mining pro-isis radicalisation signals from social media users
16. An approach for radicalization detection based on emotion signals and semantic similarity10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967219 ↗
17. Howell · Fighting Extremism: Efforts to Defeat Online ISIS Recruitment Methods · 2017
18. Contextual semantics for radicalisation detection on twitter
19. Tweeting the Jihad: Social media networks of western foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq10.1080/1057610X.2014.974948 ↗
20. Tweeting propaganda, radicalization and recruitment: Islamic state supporters multi-sided twitter networks
21. The evolution of the ISIS’ language: a quantitative analysis of the language of the first year of dabiq magazine
22. Kill them wherever you find them’-radicalizing narratives of the ‘so-called’ islamic state via the online magazine rumiyah
23. Linguistic analysis of pro-isis users on twitter
24. Linguistic analysis of lone offender manifestos
25. The secret life of pronouns10.1016/S0262-4079(11)62167-2 ↗
26. Who matters online: measuring influence, evaluating content and countering violent exremism in online social networks
27. Berger · The ISIS Twitter Census: Defining and Describing the Population of ISIS Supporters on Twitter · 2015
28. Using KNN and SVM based one-class classifier for detecting online radicalization on twitter
29. Detecting jihadist messages on twitter
30. A semantic graph-based approach for radicalisation detection on social media10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_35 ↗
31. Measuring the radicalisation risk in social networks10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2706018 ↗
32. Statistical analysis of risk assessment factors and metrics to evaluate radicalisation in twitter10.1016/j.future.2017.10.046 ↗
33. Automatic detection of online Jihadist hate speech
34. Understanding the radical mind: Identifying signals to detect extremist content on twitter
35. Predicting online extremism, content adopters, and interaction reciprocity
36. Understanding the roots of radicalisation on twitter
37. Exploring the theories of radicalization
38. An empirical approach for extreme behavior identification through tweets using machine learning10.3390/app9183723 ↗
39. W.Afzal, “A study of the informational properties of the ISIS’s content,” in Proc. of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2016.10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301056 ↗
40. Radical Islamist English-language online magazines: Research guide, strategic insights, and policy response
41. Myvocabularycom, “Violence vocabulary.” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://myvocabulary.com/word-list/violence-vocabulary/.
42. L. V.Ahn, “Bad words vocabulary,” Carnegie Mellon University. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~biglou/resources/bad-words.txt.
43. Detecting linguistic markers for radical violence in social media10.1080/09546553.2014.849948 ↗
44. C. M.Udani, “A content analysis of jihadist magazines: theoretical perspectives,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Central Florida, USA, 2018.