Analytic Hierarchy Process for Evaluating Flipped Classroom Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
In reality, the flipped classroom has gained popularity as a modern way of structuring teaching, where lectures move from in-class procedures to digitally-based assignments, freeing up the debate, and practice exercises class time. Therefore, it is essential to implement and analyze a way of teaching that will improve student performance. The paper aims to develop a model of the method of teaching science in Iraqi schools, and to assess whether teaching flipped classroom affects the achievement, motivation, and creative thinking of students by using the methodology of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The AHP approach includes several steps, including setting assessment criteria and their weights, and by assessing the methodology of the flipped classroom as compared to the conventional cognitive learning process. An experiment was carried out in Iraqi secondary schools to examine the attitude of the students towards the subject of Chemistry. The findings have indicated that the students and teachers favored flipped classroom learning more than conventional cognitive learning. The study took the following parameters compared to the traditional approach: teaching techniques, learning flexibility, teaching aids effectiveness, student participation and working environment. This paper indicates that the teachers in Iraqi schools will be able to improve and do more preparation to shift towards flipped learning in the classroom.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Teaching Methods · Online and Blended Learning · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003 ↗
2. Mohammed · Recent Trends in Applied and Associated Mathematical Sciences · 2019 · 58
3. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course10.1109/TE.2013.2249066 ↗
4. The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021 ↗
5. The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5 ↗
6. The shift towards an innovation-based model of learning
7. The mapping of on-line learning to flipped classroom: Small private online course10.3390/su10030748 ↗
8. Evaluation of e-learning implementation in higher education using multi-criteria technique
9. Evaluating of collaborative and competitive learning using MCDM technique10.1166/asl.2018.11546 ↗
10. K. E. Snowden, “Teacher perceptions of the flipped classroom: Using video lectures online to replace traditional,” Ph.D. dissertation. University of North Texas, Denton, 2012.
11. A comparative analysis for adopting an innovative pedagogical approach of flipped teaching for active classroom learning
12. Bergmann · Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student In Every Class Every Day · 2012
13. The impact of flipped learning on achievement and attitudes in higher education10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2014.0266 ↗
14. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research
15. Flipped classroom and traditional classroom: Lecturer and student perceptions between two learning cultures, a case study at Malaysian polytechnic10.12735/ier.v2i4p16 ↗
16. Flipped classroom experiences and their impact on engineering students’ attitudes towards university-level mathematics10.1080/23752696.2019.1644963 ↗
17. A comparative study of the effect of web-based versus in-class textbook ethics instruction on accounting students’ propensity to whistle-blow10.1080/08832323.2011.627890 ↗
18. Delineation of potential groundwater recharge zones using analytical hierarchy process (AHP)
19. Construction of the evaluation system of flipped classroom based on CIPP
20. Evaluating project management criteria using fuzzy analytic hierarchy Process
21. The effects of perceived conference quality on attendees’ behavioural intentions10.1080/13032917.2020.1729215 ↗
22. Exploring the utility of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in ranking livelihood activities for effective and sustainable rural development interventions in developing countries10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.017 ↗
23. Evaluation of e-learning approaches using AHP-TOPSIS technique
24. An analytical survey on implementing best practices for introducing e-learning programs to students
25. Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101793 ↗
26. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5 ↗
27. Saaty · The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation · 1980
28. Selection of suitable e-learning approach using TOPSIS technique with best ranked criteria weights
29. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems10.1016/j.rser.2005.11.005 ↗
30. Evaluating critical success factors in implementing e-learning system using multi-criteria decision-making10.1371/journal.pone.0231465 ↗
31. An AHP-based evaluation method for teacher training workshop on information and communication technology10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.04.002 ↗
32. Malczewski · GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis · 1999
33. Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS)10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590 ↗