Occupational exposure and environmental emissions related to nickel plating: a sample of the UK nickel plating sector
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose Metallic nickel and four nickel compounds are undergoing a risk assessment in the European Union. The outcomes of this risk assessment may be used for a revision of existing or introduction of new occupational exposure limits (OELs) and environmental quality standards (EQS). This study aimed at determining the impact on the nickel plating industry of reduced nickel OELs and EQS, these should be proposed in the future. Design/methodology/approach Seven companies involved in nickel plating were visited. These companies were selected to provide a reasonable cross-section of the UK nickel plating industry. Findings Concerning occupational exposure it would appear that most companies could comply with a reduced maximum exposure limit (MEL) for soluble nickel of 0.05 mg Ni/m3. There is a need to be better informed on the state-of-the-art monitoring methods for airborne nickel species in the workplace. Companies need to be encouraged to start measuring their workplace exposure levels to build up a realistic database. This can be of value when discussing new proposals for exposure limits. In relation to environmental emissions it was concluded that discharge of residues to landfill sites is becoming more difficult. For emissions to water all companies met their consent limit although a reduction in consent limits would place a burden on many companies. Atmospheric nickel emissions from extraction systems appeared to be of minor importance. Originality/value The value of the paper lies in the collection of data during site visits, the cross-section of nickel plating industry studied and the identification of further needs. All data and information presented in this study were collected during site visits and discussions with the operators and managers involved. The 16 companies visited provided a reasonable cross-section of the UK nickel plating industry which is demonstrated with a discussion of the process information. The paper clearly identifies the areas where further actions are needed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Occupational exposure and asthma · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
European Nickel Industry Association, Brussels, Belgium
F.I.M.F, Institute of Metal Finishing, Brussels, Belgium
References (7)
Show source-provided references
1. DEPA (2002), Point Sources, The national programme on survey of the water environment. Orientering Nr. 7. Miljøstyrelsen (in Danish), Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen.
2. European Commission (2005), “Reference document on best available techniques for the surface treatment of metals and plastics”, Directorate-General JRC, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, available at: http://eippcb.jrc.es.
3. Fisher, B. (2004), “Avoid nickel plating losses – protect the environment and improve profitability”, Guidelines to Help Prevent the Loss of Nickel and its Salts from the Finishing Shop, March.10.1080/00202967.2004.11871560 ↗
4. HSE (1996), “MDHS 42/2, Nickel and inorganic compounds of nickel in air (except nickel carbonyl)”, available at: www.hse.gov.uk, March.
5. HSE (2000), “MDHS 14/3, General methods for sampling and gravimetric analysis of respirable and inhalable dust”, available at: www.hse.gov.uk, February.
6. Vandenbroele and Van Sprang (2005), Environmental Risk Assessment, Ni metal and Ni compounds, Local exposure assessment, Draft 24 January 2005.
7. TGD (2003), Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment, European Chemicals Bureau, available at: http://ecb.jrc.it.