journal article·2024-04-01Open access

A critical review on the application of machine learning in supporting auxetic metamaterial design

Chonghui Zhang, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao

Journal of Physics: Materials· Volume 7· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract The progress of machine learning (ML) in the past years has opened up new opportunities to the design of auxetic metamaterials. However, successful implementation of ML algorithms remains challenging, particularly for complex problems such as domain performance prediction and inverse design. In this paper, we first reviewed classic auxetic designs and summarized their variants in different applications. The enormous variant design space leads to challenges using traditional design or topology optimization. Therefore, we also investigated how ML techniques can help address design challenges of auxetic metamaterials and when researchers should deploy them. The theories behind the techniques are explained, along with practical application examples from the analyzed literature. The advantages and limitations of different ML algorithms are discussed and trends in the field are highlighted. Finally, two practical problems of ML-aided design, design scales and data collection are discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.012 ↗
2. Progress in auxetic mechanical metamaterials: structures, characteristics, manufacturing methods and applications10.1002/adem.202000312 ↗
3. On the design of porous structures with enhanced fatigue life10.1016/j.eml.2017.08.002 ↗
4. Auxetic behavior from rotating squares10.1023/A:1006781224002 ↗
5. Low porosity metallic periodic structures with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1002/adma.201304464 ↗
6. Static and modal analysis of low porosity thin metallic auxetic structures using speckle interferometry and digital image correlation10.1007/s11340-017-0345-4 ↗
7. Design of low-porosity auxetic tessellations with reduced mechanical stress concentrations10.1016/j.eml.2021.101401 ↗
8. An investigation of the enhanced fatigue performance of low-porosity auxetic metamaterials10.1007/s11340-019-00539-7 ↗
9. Architected tunable structure for improved capability in extreme environments10.1115/1.4052251 ↗
10. Application of multifunctional mechanical metamaterials10.1002/adem.201900084 ↗
11. Analysis and parametric optimization of a novel sandwich panel with double-V auxetic structure core under air blast loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.05.001 ↗
12. Optimization of an auxetic jounce bumper based on Gaussian process metamodel and series hybrid GA-SQP algorithm10.1007/s00158-017-1869-z ↗
13. Soft network materials with isotropic negative Poisson’s ratios over large strains10.1039/C7SM02052J ↗
14. Bistable auxetic surface structures10.1145/3450626.3459940 ↗
15. Shape reconfiguring bistable structures using heat activated fibers10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116792 ↗
16. An origami-based portable solar panel system
17. Dimpled elastic sheets: a new class of non-porous negative Poisson’s ratio materials10.1038/srep18373 ↗
18. Materials discovery and design using machine learning10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
19. Variant design generation and machine learning aided deformation prediction for auxetic metamaterials10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104642 ↗
20. FDM manufactured auxetic structures: an investigation of mechanical properties using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112126 ↗
21. Chainqueen: a real-time differentiable physical simulator for soft robotics
22. A hybrid deep learning approach for the design of 2D low porosity auxetic metamaterials10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106413 ↗
23. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in design of mechanical materials10.1039/D0MH01451F ↗
24. Norman Goodier · 1970
25. Auxetic polymers: a new range of materials10.1016/0160-9327(91)90123-S ↗
26. Systematic design of tetra-petals auxetic structures with stiffness constraint10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107669 ↗
27. Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: a brief review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.12.003 ↗
28. Three decades of auxetics research–materials with negative Poisson’s ratio: a review10.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
29. Accelerating auxetic metamaterial design with deep learning10.1002/adem.201901266 ↗
30. Auxetic mechanical metamaterials10.1039/C6RA27333E ↗
31. The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials10.1098/rspa.1982.0087 ↗
32. Fabrication and mechanical properties of CFRP composite three-dimensional double-arrow-head auxetic structures10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.05.014 ↗
33. On the potential of connected stars as auxetic systems10.1080/08927020500401139 ↗
34. Elastic constants of 3-, 4-and 6-connected chiral and anti-chiral honeycombs subject to uniaxial in-plane loading10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.009 ↗
35. Auxetic behavior from rotating triangles10.1007/s10853-006-6339-8 ↗
36. On the auxetic properties of ‘rotating rectangles’ with different connectivity10.1143/JPSJ.74.2866 ↗
37. Auxetic and non-auxetic metamaterial model from interconnected rotating parallelograms and triangles10.1002/pssb.202300413 ↗
38. Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials10.1073/pnas.1217998110 ↗
39. Experimentally program large magnitude of Poisson’s ratio in additively manufactured mechanical metamaterials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105466 ↗
40. Mechanical behaviors of hierarchical cellular structures with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1007/s10853-018-2298-0 ↗
41. In-plane dynamic response and multi-objective optimization of negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) honeycomb structures with sinusoidal curve10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114018 ↗
42. Tunable compressive properties of a novel auxetic tubular material with low stress level10.1016/j.tws.2021.107882 ↗
43. In-plane elasticity of a novel vertical strut combined re-entrant honeycomb structure with negative Poisson’s ratio10.1016/j.tws.2021.107634 ↗
44. A novel twofold symmetry architected metamaterials with high compressibility and negative Poisson’s ratio10.1002/adem.202001041 ↗
45. Mechanics of unusual soft network materials with rotatable structural nodes10.1016/j.jmps.2020.104210 ↗
46. Auxetic metamaterials exhibiting giant negative Poisson’s ratios10.1002/pssr.201510178 ↗
47. Novel honeycombs with auxetic behaviour10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.006 ↗
48. Differentiable surrogate models for design and trajectory optimization of auxetic soft robots
49. Two-dimensional graded metamaterials with auxetic rectangular perforations10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113313 ↗
50. The in-plane stretching and compression mechanics of negative Poisson’s ratio structures: concave hexagon, star shape and their combination10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157840 ↗
51. Materials with structural hierarchy10.1038/361511a0 ↗
52. Hierarchical auxetic and isotropic porous medium with extremely negative Poisson’s ratio10.1016/j.eml.2021.101405 ↗
53. In plane stiffness of multifunctional hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio sub-structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.008 ↗
54. The effects of hierarchy on the in-plane elastic properties of honeycombs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.01.017 ↗
55. Stiff auxetics: hierarchy as a route to stiff, strong lattice based auxetic meta-materials10.1038/s41598-018-30822-x ↗
56. Resilient 3D hierarchical architected metamaterials10.1073/pnas.1509120112 ↗
57. Vision for data and informatics in the future materials innovation ecosystem10.1007/s11837-016-2036-5 ↗
58. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
59. Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams10.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
60. Acoustic properties of perforated liners with perpendicular arrangements of narrow slots
61. Vibration control based metamaterials and origami structures: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107945 ↗
62. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
63. Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis10.1115/1.3138303 ↗
64. Poisson’s ratio in skin10.3233/BME-1991-1104 ↗
65. A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0 ↗
66. Topology optimization approaches10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6 ↗
67. Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review10.1007/s00158-013-0912-y ↗
68. Topology optimized architectures with programmable Poisson’s ratio over large deformations10.1002/adma.201502485 ↗
69. Computational design of finite strain auxetic metamaterials via topology optimization and nonlinear homogenization10.1016/j.cma.2019.07.027 ↗
70. Topology optimization for auxetic metamaterials based on isogeometric analysis10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.021 ↗
71. Design of auxetic structures via mathematical optimization10.1002/adma.201004090 ↗
72. Materials with prescribed constitutive parameters: an inverse homogenization problem10.1016/0020-7683(94)90154-6 ↗
73. Topology optimization of multi-material negative Poisson’s ratio metamaterials using a reconciled level set method10.1016/j.cad.2016.09.009 ↗
74. Bi-material microstructural design of chiral auxetic metamaterials using topology optimization10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.058 ↗
75. Level-set topology optimization for mechanical metamaterials under hybrid uncertainties10.1016/j.cma.2017.03.002 ↗
76. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
77. Turning statistical physics models into materials design engines10.1073/pnas.1509316112 ↗
78. Artificial intelligence-enabled smart mechanical metamaterials: advent and future trends10.1080/09506608.2020.1815394 ↗
79. New frontiers for the materials genome initiative10.1038/s41524-019-0173-4 ↗
80. Deep learning the electromagnetic properties of metamaterials—a comprehensive review10.1002/adfm.202101748 ↗
81. Structural optimisation of cross-chiral metamaterial structures via genetic algorithm10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115035 ↗
82. Deep-learning-based isogeometric inverse design for tetra-chiral auxetics10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114808 ↗
83. Elucidating the auxetic behavior of cementitious cellular composites using finite element analysis and interpretable machine learning10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110341 ↗
84. Parameter optimization of bidirectional re-entrant auxetic honeycomb metamaterial based on genetic algorithm10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113915 ↗
85. Stationary sequences in Hilbert space
86. Bayesian classification with Gaussian processes10.1109/34.735807 ↗
87. Gaussian processes for machine learning10.1142/S0129065704001899 ↗
88. Free-form optimization of pattern shape for improving mechanical characteristics of a concentric tube10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111974 ↗
89. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
90. Breiman · 2017
91. Numerical and random forest modelling of the impact response of hierarchical auxetic structures10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103797 ↗
92. GAM: general auxetic metamaterial with tunable 3D auxetic behavior using the same unit cell boundary connectivity10.3390/ma16093473 ↗
93. Goodfellow · 2016
94. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
95. Speeding up discovery of auxetic zeolite frameworks by machine learning10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00434 ↗
96. Predicting the mechanical properties of zeolite frameworks by machine learning10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02532 ↗
97. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
98. Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems
99. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
100. Bishop · 2006 · vol 4