journal article·2021-10-01Open access

The case for digital twins in metal additive manufacturing

D R Gunasegaram, A B Murphy, M J Matthews, T DebRoy

Journal of Physics: Materials· Volume 4· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract The digital twin (DT) is a relatively new concept that is finding increased acceptance in industry. A DT is generally considered as comprising a physical entity, its virtual replica, and two-way digital data communications in-between. Its primary purpose is to leverage the process intelligence captured within digital models—or usually their faster-solving surrogates—towards generating increased value from the physical entities. The surrogate models are created using machine learning based on data obtained from the field, experiments and digital models, which may be physics-based or statistics-based. Anomaly detection and correction, and diagnostic closed-loop process control are examples of how a process DT can be deployed. In the manufacturing industry, its use can achieve improvements in product quality and process productivity. Metal additive manufacturing (AM) stands to gain tremendously from the use of DTs. This is because the AM process is inherently chaotic, resulting in poor repeatability. However, a DT acting in a supervisory role can inject certainty into the process by actively keeping it within bounds through real-time control commands. Closed-loop feedforward control is achieved by observing the process through sensors that monitor critical parameters and, if there are any deviations from their respective optimal ranges, suitable corrective actions are triggered. The type of corrective action (e.g. a change in laser power or a modification to the scanning speed) and its magnitude are determined by interrogating the surrogate models. Because of their artificial intelligence (AI)-endowed predictive capabilities, which allow them to foresee a future state of the physical twin (e.g. the AM process), DTs proactively take context-sensitive preventative steps, whereas traditional closed-loop feedback control is usually reactive. Apart from assisting a build process in real-time, a DT can help with planning the build of a part by pinpointing the optimum processing window relevant to the desired outcome. Again, the surrogate models are consulted to obtain the required information. In this article, we explain how the application of DTs to the metal AM process can significantly widen its application space by making the process more repeatable (through quality assurance) and cheaper (by getting builds right the first time).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Digital Transformation in Industry · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Next-Generation Cessna Denali Will Have A 3D-Printed Turboprop Engine
2. Transient dynamics of powder spattering in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process revealed by in-situ high-speed high-energy x-ray imaging10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.036 ↗
3. A review of model inaccuracy and parameter uncertainty in laser powder bed fusion models and simulations10.1115/1.4042789 ↗
4. The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649 ↗
5. Powder-based additive manufacturing—a review of types of defects, generation mechanisms, detection, property evaluation and metrology10.1504/IJASMM.2017.088204 ↗
6. Detecting keyhole pore defects and monitoring process signatures during laser powder bed fusion: a correlation between in situ pyrometry and ex situ x-ray radiography10.1016/j.addma.2020.101336 ↗
7. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 ↗
8. Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: connotation, reference model, applications and research issues10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837 ↗
9. A review of the roles of digital twin in CPS-based production systems
10. Everything you need to know about Digital Twins
11. Metallurgy, mechanistic models and machine learning in metal printing10.1038/s41578-020-00236-1 ↗
12. Characterising the digital twin: a systematic literature review10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002 ↗
13. Digital twin service towards smart manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.103 ↗
14. Digital twins and cyber–physical systems toward smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: correlation and comparison10.1016/j.eng.2019.01.014 ↗
15. Digital Twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 ↗
16. What is a digital twin?
17. Digital Twin
18. Cheat sheet: what is digital twin?
19. What is digital twin technology—and why is it so important?
20. 7 amazing examples of digital twin technology in practice
21. A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components10.1016/j.apmt.2018.11.003 ↗
22. The smart factory as a key construct of industry 4.0: a systematic literature review, International10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.011 ↗
23. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037 ↗
24. Industrial IoT and Digital Twins for a Smart Factory : An open source toolkit for application design and benchmarking10.1109/GIOTS49054.2020.9119497 ↗
25. Implementation of digital twin for engine block manufacturing processes10.3390/app10186578 ↗
26. Aitken · 2018
27. Digital twins for the process industry
28. Closed-loop digital twin on the factory floor—a manufacturing closed-loop digital twin can use analytics and data to cut costs and avoid unplanned downtime
29. Materials informatics can revolutionize the 3D printing market
30. Types of spatter and their features and formation mechanisms in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process10.1016/j.addma.2020.101438 ↗
31. Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2 ↗
32. A review of machine learning applications in additive manufacturing10.1115/DETC2019-98415 ↗
33. Controlling interdependent meso-nanosecond dynamics and defect generation in metal 3D printing10.1126/science.aay7830 ↗
34. Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps & needs, and recommendations10.1115/1.4028725 ↗
35. Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101169 ↗
36. Model-based feedforward control of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2019.100985 ↗
37. Towards a true digital twin for the metal additive manufcaturing process
38. Building blocks for a digital twin of additive manufacturing10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.039 ↗
39. Process monitoring of laser beam melting10.1002/latj.201800009 ↗
40. In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system10.1007/s00170-014-6214-8 ↗
41. Model assisted closed-loop control strategy for selective laser melting10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.053 ↗
42. Digital twins for additive manufacturing: a state-of-the-art review10.3390/app10238350 ↗
43. Investigation of melt pool geometry control in additive manufacturing using hybrid modeling10.3390/met10050683 ↗
44. Gaussian process-based surrogate modeling framework for process planning in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing of 316L stainless steel10.1007/s00170-017-1045-z ↗
45. Aiming for modeling-assisted tailored designs for additive manufacturing
46. Influence of powder bed characteristics on material quality in additive manufacturing10.1007/s00501-017-0592-9 ↗
47. Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion processes10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.017 ↗
48. Mechanistic models for additive manufacturing of metallic components10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100703 ↗
49. Temperature profile, bead geometry, and elemental evaporation in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process10.1007/s11837-019-03872-3 ↗
50. Influence of laser beam profile on the selective laser melting process of AlSi10Mg10.2351/7.0000100 ↗
51. Formation processes for large ejecta and interactions with melt pool formation in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1038/s41598-019-41415-7 ↗
52. Simulation of melt pool behaviour during additive manufacturing: underlying physics and progress10.1016/j.addma.2019.100909 ↗
53. Physics of humping formation in laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172 ↗
54. Local and global mechanical behavior and microstructure of Ti6Al4V parts built using electron beam melting technology10.1007/s11661-015-2965-6 ↗
55. Modeling and simulation of microstructure evolution for additive manufacturing of metals: a critical review10.1007/s11661-020-05946-3 ↗
56. Ji · 2018 · 93
57. On the multiphysics modeling challenges for metal additive manufacturing processes10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.019 ↗
58. Addressing the challenges for the industrial application of additive manufacturing: towards a hybrid solution10.1016/j.ijlmm.2018.07.002 ↗
59. Microscale residual stresses in additively manufactured stainless steel10.1038/s41467-019-12265-8 ↗
60. Residual stress analysis of additive manufacturing of metallic parts using ultrasonic waves: state of the art review10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.05.092 ↗
61. Residual stress in metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039 ↗
62. An integrated modeling of process-structure-property relationship in laser additive manufacturing of duplex titanium alloy10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.03.013 ↗
63. Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y ↗
64. Additive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti-6Al-4V and high-entropy alloys10.1080/14686996.2017.1361305 ↗
65. Understanding process-structure relationship for site-specific microstructure control in electron beam powder bed additive manufacturing process using numerical modeling
66. Design and tailoring of alloys for additive manufacturing10.1007/s11661-020-06009-3 ↗
67. Printability of alloys for additive manufacturing10.1038/srep19717 ↗
68. Oerlikon Metco reduces cost with alternative to abrasion resistant materials for ground engaging tools (GETs)
69. Discovery of high-entropy ceramics via machine learning10.1038/s41524-020-0317-6 ↗
70. Advanced closed-loop control system for optimizing the EBAM® Metal 3D-printing process
71. Zelinski · 2016
72. Invited review: machine learning for materials developments in metals additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2020.101641 ↗
73. Towards developing multiscale-multiphysics models and their surrogates for digital twins of metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.addma.2021.102089 ↗
74. Performance analysis of a high-speed on/off valve based on an intelligent pulse-width modulation control10.1177/1687814017733247 ↗
75. Metal 3D printing as a disruptive technology for superalloys10.1038/s41467-020-16188-7 ↗