journal article·2026-07

Enhancing NO Reduction by CO Over NiO/CeO 2 Catalyst by Optimizing the Metal Oxide–Support Interaction

Xiaodi Li, Yuejin Li, Kailong Ye, Shaohua Xie, Shan Ren, Lu Ma, Dali Yang, Fudong Liu

ChemNanoMat· Volume 12· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Noble metal catalysts are widely used in three‐way catalysts (TWCs) due to their high efficiency, but their scarcity and high cost drive the need for effective, low‐cost alternatives. In this work, a series of NiO/CeO 2 catalysts were engineered by modulating the OH content and crystallite size of the CeO 2 support. This approach yielded Ni species ranging from isolated single atoms to small clusters and larger aggregates, with varied NiO/CeO 2 interaction strengths. Evaluation of their performance in NO reduction by CO, CO oxidation, and the water–gas shift reaction revealed that the NiO/CeO 2 ‐300 catalyst, featuring small CeO 2 crystallites and highly dispersed NiO clusters, delivered superior activity for NO reduction and CO oxidation. It was demonstrated that small NiO clusters, due to their efficient CO adsorption and activation, were more active than Ni single atoms. Furthermore, the presence of water was found to influence the catalyst stability, with NiO clusters less stable than single atoms likely due to the hydroxylation effect leading to the formation of Ni(OH) 2 . Oxygen storage capacity measurements revealed that performance was governed by a combination of CeO 2 crystallite size and the abundance of NiO/CeO 2 interfaces. These findings demonstrated that the catalytic performance of Ni/CeO 2 systems could be maximized by optimizing the Ni nanostructure and its interaction with CeO 2 support, positioning them as a promising, multifunctional nonprecious alternative for three‐way catalysis application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Industrial Gas Emission Control · Catalysts for Methane Reforming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering Bourns College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE‐CERT) Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) Program UCR Center for Catalysis University of California Riverside California USA

College of Materials Science and Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing China

BASF Environmental Catalyst and Metal Solutions Iselin New Jersey USA

Advanced Interdisciplinary Institute of Environment and Ecology School of Technology for Sustainability Beijing Normal University Zhuhai China

National Synchrotron Light Source II (NSLS‐II) Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton New York USA

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.01210.1016/j.trd.2015.12.012 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.est.3c0680310.1021/acs.est.3c06803 ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20241685210.1002/anie.202416852 ↗
4. Enhancing Activity and Stability of Pd‐on‐TiO2 Single‐Atom Catalyst for Low‐Temperature CO Oxidation Through In Situ Local Environment Tailoring
5. 10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62513-510.1016/S1872-2067(16)62513-5 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41929-021-00621-110.1038/s41929-021-00621-1 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0123010.1021/acscatal.4c01230 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11937410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119374 ↗
9. 10.1039/D4RA05102E10.1039/D4RA05102E ↗
10. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0329510.1021/acscatal.7b03295 ↗
11. 10.1016/0021-9517(84)90371-310.1016/0021-9517(84)90371-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.00910.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.009 ↗
13. 10.1002/sstr.20200008110.1002/sstr.202000081 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.13913010.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139130 ↗
15. CeO2–M x O y (M = Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu)‐Based Oxides for Direct NO Decomposition
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.01010.1016/j.cej.2012.12.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcat.2024.11554510.1016/j.jcat.2024.115545 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcat.2024.11571610.1016/j.jcat.2024.115716 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10549610.1016/j.surfin.2024.105496 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b1153610.1021/acsami.7b11536 ↗
21. 10.1021/acscatal.1c0242010.1021/acscatal.1c02420 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.04310.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.043 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.10663710.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106637 ↗
24. 10.1039/D2CP00736C10.1039/D2CP00736C ↗
25. 10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00296-310.1016/S0021-9517(03)00296-3 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.3c1189710.1021/acsami.3c11897 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.5c0962010.1021/jacs.5c09620 ↗
28. 10.3390/nano1406048510.3390/nano14060485 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0568910.1021/acsanm.4c05689 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0913310.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09133 ↗
31. 10.3390/coatings1005043210.3390/coatings10050432 ↗
32. 10.1002/jrs.403010.1002/jrs.4030 ↗
33. 10.1039/D2CY00617K10.1039/D2CY00617K ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0408910.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04089 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.02910.1016/j.apcatb.2012.02.029 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0007710.1021/acs.est.1c00077 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ces.2021.11681810.1016/j.ces.2021.116818 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.00910.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.009 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14706810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147068 ↗
40. 10.1021/jacs.3c0074710.1021/jacs.3c00747 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20250524410.1002/anie.202505244 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12169610.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121696 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60320-210.1016/S1002-0721(12)60320-2 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.01310.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.013 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.03110.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.031 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0480510.1021/acs.iecr.1c04805 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.07.01510.1016/j.apcatb.2009.07.015 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.08.06110.1016/j.jcis.2012.08.061 ↗
49. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0322210.1021/acscatal.2c03222 ↗
50. 10.1021/jp402773c10.1021/jp402773c ↗
51. 10.1006/jcat.2002.365410.1006/jcat.2002.3654 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.06010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.060 ↗
53. 10.1007/s40825-020-00170-210.1007/s40825-020-00170-2 ↗
54. 10.1039/C5CY01571E10.1039/C5CY01571E ↗