High Recyclability Magnetic Iron Oxide‐Supported Ruthenium Nanocatalyst for H2 Release from Ammonia‐Borane Solvolysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report the high capacity of recycling of a technologically simple, easily recoverable, Ru@Fe3O4 magnetic nanocatalyst, efficient in the release of H2 from ammonia‐borane (AB) solvolysis, using H2O or methanol at room temperature (25 °C). The initially oxidized Ru small nanoparticles (2–4 nm) are well‐dispersed on an iron oxide support (i. e. super paramagnetic iron oxide of spinel structure, SPIO, as aggregates of 20 nm to a few μm). As nanocatalyst, this composite achieved short‐time (<10 min) AB full hydrolysis (3 equiv. H2, no NH3, [AB]=0.1 mol L−1) with a turnover frequency (TOF) of ca 20 min−1 (86 min−1 at 50 °C). The post‐catalysis characterization of the composite showed the formation of well‐defined crystalline hcp Ru(0) dispersed on the SPIO. The activity for full H2 release from AB is conserved over ten cycles, which is among the most effective recycling processes reported to date (a magnetic recycling is achieved in <2 min). Pleasingly, an even superior activity was found in the more challenging AB methanolysis, with a TOF up to ca 30 min−1 for full H2 release, achieved in a recycling process repeated over 8 cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut de Chimie Moléculaire de l'Université de Bourgogne (ICMUB – UMR CNRS 6302) Université Bourgogne – Franche-Comté (UBFC) 21078 Dijon Cedex France
Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne (ICB – UMR CNRS 6303) Université Bourgogne – Franche-Comté (UBFC) 21078 Dijon Cedex France
“Synthesis of Nanohybrids” SON – SAS 9, Avenue Alain Savary 21000 Dijon France
LCC–CNRS, Université de Toulouse, INPT, UPS 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4 France
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00793-110.1016/S0926-860X(01)00793-1 ↗
2. 10.1021/ar010065m10.1021/ar010065m ↗
3. 10.1039/C8GC00482J10.1039/C8GC00482J ↗
4. 10.1039/c0cs00136h10.1039/c0cs00136h ↗
5. 10.1039/C6GC00864J10.1039/C6GC00864J ↗
6. 10.1021/es800690410.1021/es8006904 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20050076610.1002/anie.200500766 ↗
8. 10.1002/ange.20050076610.1002/ange.200500766 ↗
9. 10.1039/C2CC35663E10.1039/C2CC35663E ↗
10. 10.1002/cctc.20140305710.1002/cctc.201403057 ↗
11. 10.1039/B610848M10.1039/B610848M ↗
12. 10.1002/adsc.20040424710.1002/adsc.200404247 ↗
13. 10.1021/cr500134h10.1021/cr500134h ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20210275910.1002/smll.202102759 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20070494310.1002/anie.200704943 ↗
16. 10.1002/ange.20070494310.1002/ange.200704943 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.03710.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.17210.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.172 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.02310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.023 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.04910.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.049 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.03810.1016/j.jcis.2019.06.038 ↗
22. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0740210.1021/acssuschemeng.9b07402 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-011-0174-110.1007/s12274-011-0174-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.07610.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.02.076 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.11310.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.113 ↗
26. 10.1002/cctc.20140004210.1002/cctc.201400042 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.06.05910.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.06.059 ↗
28. 10.1039/C9DT03838H10.1039/C9DT03838H ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.24410.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.244 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.05410.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.054 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.08.04010.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.08.040 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7NJ01035D10.1039/C7NJ01035D ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.04510.1016/j.jcis.2017.08.045 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.catcom.2018.09.00210.1016/j.catcom.2018.09.002 ↗
35. 10.1002/sia.585210.1002/sia.5852 ↗
36. 10.1179/00070599579811370910.1179/000705995798113709 ↗
37. 10.1002/sia.302610.1002/sia.3026 ↗
38. We examined by TEM the catalyst changes (see the Supporting Information) after three cycling runs which conserved a good dispersion of small nanoparticles suggesting that surface poisoning by N B side-products or re-oxidation of surface Ru might be involved in the progressive deactivation process.
39. 10.1002/chem.20180320010.1002/chem.201803200 ↗
40. 10.1021/ic700772a10.1021/ic700772a ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.16310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.163 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.12510.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.125 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.01.00410.1016/j.chempr.2018.01.004 ↗
44. 10.1002/aenm.20200213810.1002/aenm.202002138 ↗
45. 10.1039/c0cp02090g10.1039/c0cp02090g ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.12110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.121 ↗
47. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0669610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06696 ↗