DataVXChemNanoMatPaper
journal article·2020-05Open access

Crosslinked Coating Improves the Signal‐to‐Noise Ratio of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI)

Sonja Horvat, Patrick Vogel, Thomas Kampf, Andreas Brandl, Aws Alshamsan, Hisham A. Alhadlaq, Maqusood Ahamed, Krystyna Albrecht, Volker C. Behr, Andreas Beilhack, Jürgen Groll

ChemNanoMat· Volume 6· Issue 5
Publisher pageOpen full text
Source abstract

Abstract

Abstract Magnetic particle imaging is an emerging tomographic method used for evaluation of the spatial distribution of iron‐oxide nanoparticles. In this work, the effect of the polymer coating on the response of particles was studied. Particles with covalently crosslinked coating showed improved signal and image resolution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

PolymersNanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry and Bavarian Polymer Institute University of Würzburg Pleicherwall 2 97070 Würzburg Germany

Experimental Physics V University of Würzburg 97074 Würzburg Germany

Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Würzburg 97080 Würzburg Germany

Department of Medicine II Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine Würzburg University Hospital 97080 Würzburg Germany

King Abdullah Institute for Nanotechnology King Saud University 11451 Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Department of Pharmaceutics College of Pharmacy King Saud University 11451 Riyadh Saudi Arabia

Department of Physics and Astronomy College of Science King Saud University 11451 Riyadh Saudi Arabia

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-019-09704-x10.1038/s41467-019-09704-x ↗
2.
3. 10.1109/TMI.2013.228547210.1109/TMI.2013.2285472 ↗
4. 10.1109/TMAG.2019.292419810.1109/TMAG.2019.2924198 ↗
5.
6. 10.1109/TMI.2014.232751510.1109/TMI.2014.2327515 ↗
7. 10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/662010.1088/0031-9155/61/18/6620 ↗
8.
9. 10.1038/nature0380810.1038/nature03808 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6c9910.1088/1361-6560/aa6c99 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11095-016-1958-510.1007/s11095-016-1958-5 ↗
12.
13. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab03c010.1088/1361-6463/ab03c0 ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/20/20500710.1088/0022-3727/42/20/205007 ↗
15.
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.05710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.057 ↗
17. 10.1371/journal.pone.005733510.1371/journal.pone.0057335 ↗
18.
19. 10.1002/jbm.a.3565410.1002/jbm.a.35654 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5NR01651G10.1039/C5NR01651G ↗
21. 10.1021/nn200227210.1021/nn2002272 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat125110.1038/nmat1251 ↗
23.
24. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.04.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.04.006 ↗
25. 10.1039/C6RA10388J10.1039/C6RA10388J ↗
26. 10.1007/s12034-018-1556-810.1007/s12034-018-1556-8 ↗
27.
28. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.115010.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1150 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.042 ↗
30.
31. Zhang W. G. · ASC Nano · 2010 · 4 · 6757
32. 10.1021/bm060893910.1021/bm0608939 ↗
33. 10.1021/bm060182a10.1021/bm060182a ↗
34. 10.1039/C8CC05627G10.1039/C8CC05627G ↗
35. Wei H. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2017 · 201620145
36. 10.7150/thno.536610.7150/thno.5366 ↗
37.
38. 10.1021/nl102623x10.1021/nl102623x ↗
39. 10.1002/jmri.2119410.1002/jmri.21194 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.8b0656910.1021/acsami.8b06569 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5TB00593K10.1039/C5TB00593K ↗
42. 10.1039/C7QM00202E10.1039/C7QM00202E ↗
43. Draack S. · International Journal on Magnetic Particle Imaging · 2017 · 3
44. 10.3390/ijms14091868210.3390/ijms140918682 ↗
45. 10.1002/cmmi.39110.1002/cmmi.391 ↗