journal article·2025-08Open access

Enhancing Photocatalytic Efficiency through Morphology and Bandgap Tuning in Gallium‐Doped Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Daniel Furka, Samuel Furka, Julio Ariel Dueñas Santana, Andrej Tóth, Mária Čaplovičová, Erik Rakovský, Michal Čičkan, Marián Janek

ChemNanoMat· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

The photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes in a low‐energy 3D‐printed photoreactor (20 mWh day−1) is investigated using nanoparticles synthesized via spray‐assisted co‐precipitation. The study investigates nanoparticles with pseudohexagonal and elongated spindle‐like morphologies, doped with varying gallium levels (0.5–20 mol%), providing new insights into dopant‐induced effects on photocatalytic performance. Structural characterization via X‐ray powder diffraction and Fourier transform infrared confirms dopant incorporation. Gallium doping systematically reduces the optical bandgap energy (), enhancing charge separation and photocatalytic efficiency. The undoped pseudohexagonal and elongated spindle‐like nanoparticles exhibit bandgap energies of 3.183 and 3.192 eV, respectively, which decreased to 3.146 and 3.171 eV with increasing doping levels. Brunauer‐Emmett‐Teller analysis shows that pseudohexagonal nanoparticles have a larger surface area (9.46 m2 g−1) than spindle‐like nanoparticles (5.09 m2 g−1). Despite this, spindle‐like nanoparticles generally exhibit higher photodegradation efficiencies than pseudohexagonal nanoparticles, reaching 94.32% for Phloxine B over 24 h, with similar trends observed for Oxazine 170 and Rhodamine 123. The rate constant systematically increases with gallium content, particularly in spindle‐like ZnO. These findings highlight the importance of nanoparticle morphology and doping in optimizing energy‐efficient photocatalytic materials for sustainable environmental remediation or self‐cleaning surfaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Natural Sciences Department of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Comenius University Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6 84104 Bratislava Slovakia

Scuola Superiore Meridionale University of Naples Federico II 80138 Naples Italy

Chemical Engineering Department University of Matanzas Matanzas 44740 Cuba

Centre for Nanodiagnostics Slovak University of Technology Vazovova 5 81243 Bratislava Slovakia

Faculty of Natural Sciences Department of Inorganic Chemistry Comenius University Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6 84104 Bratislava Slovakia

Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology Department of Inorganic Materials Slovak University of Technology Radlinského 9 81237 Bratislava Slovakia

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/nano1403025510.3390/nano14030255 ↗
2. 10.3762/bjnano.15.1110.3762/bjnano.15.11 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.10859910.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108599 ↗
4. 10.1021/acscatal.3c0566910.1021/acscatal.3c05669 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0825310.1021/acsomega.3c08253 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10646-023-02726-810.1007/s10646-023-02726-8 ↗
7. 10.3390/molecules2812467410.3390/molecules28124674 ↗
8. 10.1186/s12941-023-00639-210.1186/s12941-023-00639-2 ↗
9. 10.3390/jfb1409046310.3390/jfb14090463 ↗
10. 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00297.810.5958/0974-360X.2020.00297.8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jksus.2023.10295710.1016/j.jksus.2023.102957 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13268710.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132687 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.10205710.1016/j.jcou.2022.102057 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11664-019-07490-210.1007/s11664-019-07490-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.006 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c0116410.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01164 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.physb.2023.41490310.1016/j.physb.2023.414903 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10854-021-06875-610.1007/s10854-021-06875-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11120110.1016/j.inoche.2023.111201 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.11572610.1016/j.seppur.2019.115726 ↗
21. Yu K. S. · J. Nanomater. · 2013 · 2013 · 3
22. 10.1080/10667857.2023.225364610.1080/10667857.2023.2253646 ↗
23. 10.3390/cryst1004025210.3390/cryst10040252 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15232310.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152323 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11213910.1016/j.optmat.2022.112139 ↗
26. 10.3390/molecules2811427710.3390/molecules28114277 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.11289610.1016/j.mcat.2022.112896 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11161310.1016/j.inoche.2023.111613 ↗
29. 10.1039/D0CY01802C10.1039/D0CY01802C ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-023-34458-410.1038/s41598-023-34458-4 ↗
31. 10.3390/min1204047610.3390/min12040476 ↗
32. 10.1002/pssa.20220036410.1002/pssa.202200364 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.indic.2023.10024710.1016/j.indic.2023.100247 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.10721810.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107218 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.05310.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.053 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-019-43184-910.1038/s41598-019-43184-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.01010.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.010 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.clema.2022.10004110.1016/j.clema.2022.100041 ↗
39. 10.1088/1361-6463/accfa510.1088/1361-6463/accfa5 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.09411310.1103/PhysRevB.108.094113 ↗
41. 10.1002/slct.20240259010.1002/slct.202402590 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.509357610.1063/1.5093576 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.01500110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.015001 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.02610.1016/j.actamat.2006.07.026 ↗
45. 10.1007/s40097-018-0271-810.1007/s40097-018-0271-8 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0162110.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01621 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.02510.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.025 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.23520710.1103/PhysRevB.88.235207 ↗
49. 10.1002/adfm.20230452310.1002/adfm.202304523 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.514231310.1063/1.5142313 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12589610.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125896 ↗
52. 10.3390/nano1102045210.3390/nano11020452 ↗
53. 10.1038/srep3619410.1038/srep36194 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.11050110.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110501 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.16894910.1016/j.ijleo.2022.168949 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.00210.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.002 ↗
57. 10.1002/pssa.20220061610.1002/pssa.202200616 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.01110.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.011 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.10.00910.1016/j.jmat.2020.10.009 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10653310.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106533 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11363310.1016/j.molliq.2020.113633 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.23510.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.235 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0471510.1021/acsanm.3c04715 ↗
64. 10.1248/cpb.c12-0011410.1248/cpb.c12-00114 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.11073510.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110735 ↗
66. Glover S. A. · S. Afr. J. Chem. · 1985 · 38 · 163
67. 10.1016/j.wri.2023.10022010.1016/j.wri.2023.100220 ↗
68. 10.3109/03639045.2011.64819510.3109/03639045.2011.648195 ↗
69. 10.3390/ijms2209464210.3390/ijms22094642 ↗