The Crystallinity of Metal Oxide in Carbonized Metal Organic Frameworks and the Effect on Restricting Polysulfides
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Metal/carbon nanohybrids show promise for alleviating polysulfides shuttling in lithium‐sulfur batteries. However, the synergetic effect between amorphous metal and carbon to restrict the migration of polysulfides is still far from fully understood. Herein, two porous metal/carbon nanohybrids with different crystallinity metal oxides components (amorphous Al2O3 and crystal Fe3O4) have been prepared through pyrolysis of the MOF precursors, which are adopted as a sulfur support to impede the polysulfides shuttling. As expected, the amorphous Al2O3 with nitrogen‐doped porous carbon exhibits an attractive durability at 1 C over 1000 cycles, meanwhile, the coulombic efficiency could maintain at 97.5%. Compared to it, crystal Fe3O4 shows an inferior electrochemical performance, which is attributed to the amorphous structure that can accelerate ions diffusion and charge transfer to improve the rate performance and capacity. The distinguished discharge performance of the design will be potentially used to develop applicable Li‐S batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing School of Chemical Engineering Institution China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao 266580 China
Shanghai Institute of Space Power-Sources 2965 Dongchuan Road, Minhang District Shanghai China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1.
2. 10.1002/adma.20160682310.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20180050810.1002/adfm.201800508 ↗
4.
5. 10.1039/c2ee22294a10.1039/c2ee22294a ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20160680210.1002/adma.201606802 ↗
7.
8. 10.1002/adma.20140119110.1002/adma.201401191 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.8b0320110.1021/acsami.8b03201 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6EE02364A10.1039/C6EE02364A ↗
11.
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.07310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.073 ↗
13. 10.1142/S179329201750021710.1142/S1793292017500217 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.02410.1016/j.carbon.2014.10.024 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0050010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00500 ↗
16.
17. 10.1002/chem.20130168910.1002/chem.201301689 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20170759210.1002/adfm.201707592 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4TA01241K10.1039/C4TA01241K ↗
20.
21. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.11.01010.1016/j.ensm.2017.11.010 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20170243410.1002/aenm.201702434 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.07.03810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.07.038 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y ↗
25. 10.1002/cssc.20150074110.1002/cssc.201500741 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.07.01510.1016/j.ensm.2017.07.015 ↗
27. 10.1021/nn103584t10.1021/nn103584t ↗
28.
29. 10.1021/nn503220h10.1021/nn503220h ↗
30. 10.1039/C3NR04347A10.1039/C3NR04347A ↗
31.
32. 10.1002/anie.20120622910.1002/anie.201206229 ↗
33. 10.1002/cssc.20170244610.1002/cssc.201702446 ↗
34.
35. 10.1002/adma.20110339210.1002/adma.201103392 ↗
36. 10.1021/nl200658a10.1021/nl200658a ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20130316610.1002/adma.201303166 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0087010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00870 ↗
39.
40. 10.1038/s41467-017-00575-810.1038/s41467-017-00575-8 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.03510.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.035 ↗
42.
43. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.02010.1016/j.nanoen.2018.12.020 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0181510.1021/acsaem.8b01815 ↗
45. 10.1002/aenm.20190095310.1002/aenm.201900953 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.07010.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.070 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0862710.1021/acsnano.6b08627 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0370010.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03700 ↗