journal article·2024-02Open access

Bacteria‐Epithelial Cell Interaction Influences Cytotoxicity and Antibacterial Effect of Silver‐Gold Alloy Nanoparticles on a Species‐Specific Level

Katharina Doll‐Nikutta, Nils Heine, Marjan Kheirmand‐Parizi, Frederic Stein, Jennifer Ulrich, Christoph Rehbock, Andreas Winkel, Stephan Barcikowski, Meike Stiesch

ChemNanoMat· Volume 10· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract The rising number of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria requires alternative antibacterial substances as therapeutics. However, besides a strong effect against bacteria, they should not exhibit cytotoxicity towards human cells. Typically, both properties are tested in separate in vitro experiments that do not take into account naturally occurring interactions. To analyze whether the bacteria‐cell interaction influences the results of antibacterial and cytotoxic testing, surfactant‐free antibacterial silver‐gold alloy nanoparticles produced by laser ablation in liquid were examined both separately and in a straightforward coculture setup. Whereas different commensal bacteria and human skin cells exhibited reduced metabolic activity at comparable concentrations when treated separately, their response completely differed when analyzed in a combined coculture. For the combination of oral keratinocytes and Staphylococcus aureus, reduced cytotoxicity with increasing cell numbers, but a similar antibacterial effect quantified by standard plate counting could be observed. In contrast, coculture of keratinocytes and Porphyromonas gingivalis resulted in a complete absence of cytotoxicity and antibacterial effect, probably due to bacterial invasion of cells. These results clearly showed that the bacteria‐cell interaction greatly influences the results of antibacterial and cytotoxic testing and highlight the importance of more complex in vitro experiments to reliably characterize novel antibacterial substances for efficient clinical translation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomedical Materials Science Hannover Medical School Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1 30625 Hannover Germany

Lower Saxony Center for Biomedical Engineering, Implant Research and Development (NIFE) Stadtfelddamm 34 30625 Hannover Germany

Institute for Technical Chemistry University Duisburg-Essen Universitätsstrasse 2 45117 Essen Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.00310.1016/j.injury.2006.04.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 ↗
3. Mikolai C. · Cell. Microbiol. · 2020
4. 10.1038/nri378510.1038/nri3785 ↗
5. 10.1038/nrmicro238110.1038/nrmicro2381 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.01210.1016/j.chom.2014.05.012 ↗
7. 10.1002/eji.20134420210.1002/eji.201344202 ↗
8. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.3310.1038/nrdp.2018.33 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-021-23659-y10.1038/s41467-021-23659-y ↗
10. 10.1021/acsabm.2c0001410.1021/acsabm.2c00014 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00339-012-7264-010.1007/s00339-012-7264-0 ↗
12. 10.1039/b105437f10.1039/b105437f ↗
13. 10.1039/C3AN01463K10.1039/C3AN01463K ↗
14. 10.1007/s13404-013-0125-610.1007/s13404-013-0125-6 ↗
15. 10.1039/D2FD00092J10.1039/D2FD00092J ↗
16. 10.3762/bjnano.5.16510.3762/bjnano.5.165 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.00110.1016/j.tim.2004.11.001 ↗
18. 10.1111/cmi.1307810.1111/cmi.13078 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.13010.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.130 ↗
20. 10.1039/C4CP03316G10.1039/C4CP03316G ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c0046810.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00468 ↗
22. 10.1002/adhm.20230208410.1002/adhm.202302084 ↗
23. 10.1098/rsif.2013.093110.1098/rsif.2013.0931 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.10810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.108 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.08010.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.080 ↗
26. 10.1002/adsc.20200100310.1002/adsc.202001003 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsnano.0c1015010.1021/acsnano.0c10150 ↗
28. 10.1002/anie.20120592310.1002/anie.201205923 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.12.00610.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.12.006 ↗
30. 10.2217/nnm.14.13910.2217/nnm.14.139 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.01610.1016/j.mimet.2016.07.016 ↗
32. 10.3390/cells905122610.3390/cells9051226 ↗
33. 10.3390/ijms2315805810.3390/ijms23158058 ↗
34. 10.3390/pathogens1104042210.3390/pathogens11040422 ↗
35. 10.1155/2014/37029710.1155/2014/370297 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.02610.1016/j.micpath.2019.04.026 ↗
37. 10.1128/mBio.00632-1510.1128/mBio.00632-15 ↗
38. 10.1073/pnas.100181510710.1073/pnas.1001815107 ↗
39. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00192.x10.1046/j.1462-5822.2002.00192.x ↗
40. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01743.x10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01743.x ↗
41. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.10.01110.1016/j.micinf.2007.10.011 ↗
42. 10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y10.1007/s13204-021-01693-y ↗
43. 10.1002/cphc.20160113910.1002/cphc.201601139 ↗
44. 10.1186/s12951-015-0154-910.1186/s12951-015-0154-9 ↗
45. 10.1098/rsif.2013.093110.1098/rsif.2013.0931 ↗
46. 10.1021/la404556a10.1021/la404556a ↗
47. 10.1039/C2CP42641B10.1039/C2CP42641B ↗
48. 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1436-1447.200010.1128/MCB.20.4.1436-1447.2000 ↗