journal article·2023-01Open access

Tuning the Electromagnetic Shielding Mechanism with Nitrogen‐doped Graphene Aerogels

Marcos Álvarez, Juan Baselga, Javier Pozuelo

ChemNanoMat· Volume 9· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The electromagnetic shielding efficiency of a given material can be quantified as the sum of three contributions: reflection, absorption, and multiple reflections, which under certain conditions can be reduced to the first two, which are the main shielding processes decisive for its further application. A simple process to prepare nitrogen‐doped graphene aerogels followed by subsequent thermal treatments is proposed to adapt and control the shielding mechanisms that take place to the possible requirements of the system. Nitrogen‐doped aerogels are prepared by the addition of urea in the hydrothermal synthesis and subsequent heat treatments at 500 and 1000 °C. Reflection/absorption power ratio values of unity down to values as low as 0.2 are obtained. This study represents an advance in electromagnetic shielding materials and the adaptation of these to the needs of different applications, reducing the traditional negative environmental impact of these devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de Materiales e Ingeniería Química (IAAB) Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Leganés Madrid 28911 Spain

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.08210.1016/j.carbon.2014.02.082 ↗
2. 10.1002/tcr.20170006610.1002/tcr.201700066 ↗
3. 10.1039/D1TA00417D10.1039/D1TA00417D ↗
4. 10.1063/1.496140110.1063/1.4961401 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.0c0119010.1021/acsami.0c01190 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssr.20140915110.1002/pssr.201409151 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6NR02133F10.1039/C6NR02133F ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.29310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.293 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0883210.1021/acsnano.9b08832 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aag242110.1126/science.aag2421 ↗
11. 10.1039/D1TA07781C10.1039/D1TA07781C ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.07010.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.070 ↗
13. 10.1142/S179329201750018710.1142/S1793292017500187 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-017-1838-310.1007/s10853-017-1838-3 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20150173510.1002/adma.201501735 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20150239510.1002/adfm.201502395 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.02410.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.024 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10854-020-03938-y10.1007/s10854-020-03938-y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.12702610.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127026 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.cis.2020.10228110.1016/j.cis.2020.102281 ↗
21. 10.1088/1674-0068/25/03/325-32910.1088/1674-0068/25/03/325-329 ↗
22. Hu M. · ES. Energy. Environ. · 2019 · 3 · 45
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.12510.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.125 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20120003810.1002/aenm.201200038 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0083510.1021/acsanm.0c00835 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.04810.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.048 ↗
27. 10.1039/c2ta01064j10.1039/c2ta01064j ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.19310.1016/j.cej.2019.02.193 ↗
29. National Institutes of Health ImageJ image processing and analysis in java 2019.
30. 10.1002/978352768001610.1002/9783527680016 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1220337610.3390/ma12203376 ↗
32. 10.1021/cs200652y10.1021/cs200652y ↗
33. 10.1039/D0TA11939C10.1039/D0TA11939C ↗
34. 10.1039/C6RA90131J10.1039/C6RA90131J ↗
35. 10.1039/C6NR07448K10.1039/C6NR07448K ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.01910.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.019 ↗
37. Xu P. · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 10443
38. 10.1016/j.susc.2019.12154610.1016/j.susc.2019.121546 ↗
39. 10.1039/c2ra01367c10.1039/c2ra01367c ↗
40. 10.1039/C9TA02525A10.1039/C9TA02525A ↗
41. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.06810.1016/j.carbon.2019.02.068 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.02810.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.028 ↗
43. 10.1039/C7TC05869A10.1039/C7TC05869A ↗
44. Agilent Technologies Agil 85071E Mater. Meas. Software 2013.
45. 10.1515/ntrev-2022-008810.1515/ntrev-2022-0088 ↗